We have been saying it for years , We have been ignored but this past week has certainly put a different light on the subject.
We knew it was going on because of our experience . Only a corrupt government would stop you from questioning corruption.
When you look at it just a few players in the right position and you have all the elements of STATE CAPTURE .
The National party Hierarchy certainly seem to look after themselves and their associates. It is what is regarded as the rule of invisibility .. if you cant see what we are doing then you will think were the good guys.
We found these interesting links
- National party Boss
- High-profile Tauranga man avoids being named this man is directly linked to 1 above.
- New Zealands Rolph Harris
We also exposed the back ground to the Crafer farms and showed that there is a gap in the continuity of the companies which are thought to own the Crafar farms and are purchasing Lochinvar .
The missing link is the circled company , we know nothing about it. it sits proudly just after the company we vetted as being suitable to make the purchase and the company with the same name which actually made the purchase.
More interesting still is that Terry Lee who was a director of Oravida and literally left the company one day to set up the company which was involved in the purchase of the farms.
We also see that Peter Goodfellow and Oravida are joined at the hip
Nationals multiple connections with Oravida – is it all about scampi ?
Oravida and Sanford, partners in premium seafood for ChinaRead more
Of course there is no getting away from that Visit of Judith Collins to Oravida and her husbands position as Director .Jobs for the boys
There are large business interests at stake and it certainly helps to have some inside support . Pitty this energy has not gone into New Zealand companies.
Judith Collins must be about the only person in the world who has held the position of head of the law society, Minister of Justice and Minister of Police .
With just the right amount of tinkering on the inside and influencing any thing is possible..
The article is about Suzanne Snively and Victor Cattermole
Susan Snively of transparency International fame is the chair person of Vault compliance systems .
She works along side Victor Cattermole sole director and share holder of the company.
382 Wairakei Road, Burnside, Christchurch, 8053 , New Zealand
According to Whale Oil “Victor Cattermole is one such dodgy ratbag standing for public office. Amongst other things he has been censured by Securities and Commerce Commissions for running a (likely) ponzi scheme.”
Despite this the company registered to 3/38 Clearwater Drive, Belfast, Christchurch, 8011 , New Zealand gives its address on the web site as Level 19, Two International Finance Centre,8 Finance Street,Central, Hong Kong .
This is also the address for http://suisseinternationalgroup.com/contact/
I personally find that funny as Suzanne used to work for Jarden and co which became credit Suisse.
It would appear that Clearwater Avenue is a new development on the golf club Zoodle is the only site which locates it , we still need to check it out perhaps Suzanne can help us out on this one.
It is not clear where Mr Cattermole, who uses both Victor and Thomas as his first name , lives as the company records on 5 August show him using the address of 25 Northcote Road,Northcote Christchurch 8052 which is the address he used as Thomas Cattermole on the vault shareholder application form but at the same time as Director Thomas victor Henry Ronald Catermole and using the same signature claimed to live at 382 Wairakei Road, Burnside,vault compliance
I find this all very confusing Suzanne do you work from Hong Kong or do you work from Christchurch.
what is the registered office of the company and who exactly works in Hong Kong.
And what about the transparency of your business partner what standards do you have .. what can we expect?
We found that the finding that we had ” the least corrupt public sector ” came about due to a number of factors.
- Corruption was not defined or looked at – due to the assumption that as”the least corrupt country ” we must be doing things right .
- Transparency Internationals New Zealand itself having given NZ the status of being perceived to be the least corrupt so as to encourage business growth in NZ
- Transparency International New Zealand funded by government departments
see correspondence with the minister Judith Collins Please provide the evidence to support that New Zealand is the least corrupt country in the world.
and the response from the companies office
the following is a news release
We repeatedly hear that Shanghai Pengxin has purchased land in New Zealand previously the Crafar farms and now poised to buy the Lochinver Station.
It is time that we got our facts right as to who actually owns the property and just a tiny bit of research brings massive concerns.
There is no company in New Zealand called Shanghai Pengxin and no land in New Zealand owned by a company of that name
There is however an entity called PENGXIN NEW ZEALAND FARM GROUP LIMITED which owns some 76 titles according to Terranet .
PENGXIN NEW ZEALAND FARM GROUP LIMITED has one director, Chinese billionaire Zhaobai JIANG, the company’s sole shareholder is MILK NEW ZEALAND HOLDING LIMITED which in turn is also directed by Mr Jiang.
But look at the shareholding of MILK NEW ZEALAND HOLDING LIMITED and it is allegedly owned by Milk New Zealand Investment Limited Suite 1, 139 Vincent Street, Auckland Central.
Strangely enough Milk New Zealand investment does not exist on the New Zealand company register.
The question is how can a non-existent company make an application to be a shareholder?
According to the lawyers for the company’s registrar takes applications on face value, this is the reality of the integrity systems which Transparency New Zealand reported on recently .
It was these very same integrity systems which Judith Collins attributed to New Zealand being perceived as the least corrupt.
If we don’t look we don’t see
If we don’t define it we cannot have it
Will there be an enquiry into the company structure of PENGXIN NEW ZEALAND FARM GROUP LIMITED ?
Grace Haden Independent candidate for Epsom.
It is business as usual at the premises of Equity law Barristers Limited, the only things that have changed is that the receptionist now answers the phone as equity group. Ask her if it is a law firm and she will tell you that it is .
The sign in the foyer and by the lift at 44 Khyber pass road still read Equity Law . Part of the premises have been leased to Stewart an associates lawyers limited a firm from Alexandra operated by struck off lawyer Eugine Orlov’s associate who is also director of companies owned by Evgeny Orlovs wife , Lilia Soboleva.EQUITY TRUST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED .Lilia operates world renowned companies such as Unihold . Maxhold etc.
The only thing which has gone is the web site but despite this Orlov still promotes himself as a lawyer on you tube .
Today we obtained information from Julia Leenoh that she is working under the ” trading “name Stewart and associates equity law which she claims is a branch of Stewart and Associates .
The fact that she is a very new lawyer working under what appears to be the supervision of a struck off lawyer appears to be beside the point see Lawyers to face forced competency test
for more see legal bullying and
Joo Yeon Leenoh aka Julia Leenoh the Pawn in the game – recent law graduate who has held a practicing certificate for just a month
Evgeny Orlov the Russian chess master , struck off lawyer , director and shareholder of Equity law Barristers limited
Greg Stewart The associate who either has not done due diligence on his business partner or has gone into the venture with open eyes, he has become a vehicle for Orlov .
George Bogiatto the barrister who is not great on detail and is quick to attack the opposition .
Stewart and Associates the incorporated law firm whose name is now on the same letter head as equity law
Equity Law the law firm run and operated by struck off lawyer Eugine Orlov
This morning I had yet another truck load of documents served on me on behalf of Stewart and associates equity law . These documents were the same as last time except that they have now been filed in the court prior to service.
I also received a notice seeking to change the fourth defendant from Equity law to equity law barristers Ltd. there is however no clarification of the first plaintiff Equity trust International and I am uncertain as to whether this is the tax agent or the company which is involved in international trusts which are regularly in the overseas press . for certainty the companies I refer to are
- EQUITY TRUST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED – 2136248 – NZBN: 9429032722697
(previously known as STAR CHAMBER LIMITED)
- EQUITY TRUST INTERNATIONAL TAX AGENTS LIMITED – 3658153 – NZBN: 9429030881143
I note that you are the director of the former and the share holder is Evgeny Orlov’s wife Lilia Soboleva while the latter is owned and directed by SOBOLEVA
I also received a bankruptcy notice which is rather deficient in many ways and did not have a judgment attached.
The only sealed order which I received was fraudulently obtained see the detail under How to make an extra couple of grand and get the registrar to sign off on it
That debt was addressed through the Set-Off Act 1735 as per my communications with Mr Bogiatto .
Since communicating the set off to him, I have heard no more about this matter and have presumed that the debt was settled especially since the law society have found that Orlov over charged me b some $30,000.
I am rather accustomed to having a payment reminder or demand of some sort sent to me if there was still a sum outstanding. ESPECIALLY given that I believe it has been settled.
section 4 of the lawyers and conveyancers act makes it clear that you have to uphold the rule of law
It is therefore quite in appropriate for you to issue a bankruptcy demand for a debt that has been settled.
If there was an issue with the set off I woudl have thought that it woudl have been appropriate for some one to have communicated with me since the 25 February when I advised that the debt was settled by that means.
I also asked for a proper set of accounts as the sum which could be claimed was not $5038 . The judge awarded costs on a 1 A basis . work it out yourself the sealed order is a document which Bogiatto caused to be sealed knowing it to be false , ( please refer to my correspondence with him )
I wish to advise you that your practice is being used for fraud by continuing with the bankruptcy claim you are a party to the offence . You are taking this action on behalf of Orlov to cause me financial hardship and waste my time .
the action is an abuse of the process of the court because
- The debt has been settled by way of offset Act
- the sum is fraudulently obtained as it is greater than the court awarded
- No communication has been received to advise that the sum is still considered as outstanding.
- You are seeking to have it paid to EVGENCY ??
- the sealed order has not been attached sealed order
- the sealed order is fraudulent as 1A is 1 day allowance not three as I had pointed out in detail to Bogiatto both before and after the order was sealed. the difference being $2,640.
I again advise you to do due diligence with your directorship of EQUITY TRUST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
It would appear that your wife Alice has taken over the directorship of EUROSTONE HOLDINGS LIMITED , the previous director was Evgeny’s receptionist who was uncomfortable with the three directorships which he had asked her to take on. an it was only when I saw the international connections that she realised she was being used.
Euro stone holdings is shareholder of
Director: Ulpiano Calderon MORENO
The Century Tower, Suite 713, Ave. Ricardo J. Alfaro, Panama City , Panama
Registered office: Suite 104, 184 Symonds Street, Eden Terrace,
Director :Edgardo MEDINA
Apartment 307, Bldg Los Alamos, Via Jose, Agustin Arango, Corregimiento Rio, Abajo , Panama
Director: Ulpiano Calderon MORENO
Calle 17 Plaza Amador, Casa El Vaticanito No.10, Ciudad De Panama , Panama
Director : Edgardo MEDINA
Apt 307, Bldg Los Alamos, Via Jose Agustin Arango, Corregimiento Rio Abajo , Panama
Notice how Moreno has two different addresses .
More info about these
Ulpiano Calderon MORENO
According to open corporates this man had the following directorships in
107 New Zealand
239 United Kingdom
Currently two active companies are registered in New Zealand both of them share the 44 Khyber pass address.
59 New Zealand
All New Zealand companies have been struck off except these two .
I am going through all of the companies registered to L 4, 44 Khyber pass and sharing my findings with the international press as this totally integrates with their work on money laundering . I will of course be sharing this with the authorities. Orlov Knows my investigation skills that is why he is attacking me , the more he attacks the more I discover and publish .
Please remember the rules something about a lawyer needing to remain independent and not using their office for fraud. Also look up section 66 Crimes act .
so in summary I cannot be bankrupted for a sum which is
- not owing
- based on a fraudulently sealed order
- abuse of process
Orlov wants me to get a lawyer so that I can be out of pocket even if the court orders costs in my favour he wont pay it , so I am not playing his game
Look forward to hearing from you very soon , if not then I will put all of this ( and more ) through to the court in the period prescribed .
regards Grace Haden
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2014 12:26 p.m.
Subject: complaint with regards to Stewart and associates equity law
I wish to make a complaint with regards to a fictional law firm
Stewart and associates lawyers are an incorporated law firm director Greg Stewart . shareholders are himself and his non lawyer wife
Equity law barristers are another law firm sole director and shareholder is Eugine Orlov who was struck off last year
There is no person known as Stewart and associated equity law it is merely a concoction of an incorporated law firm and a firm belonging to s struck off lawyer .
In June this year Leenoh, Joo Yeon obtained a practicing certificate and is shown as being an employee of Stewart and associated equity law
I have established that this recent graduate is practicing from the premises of Equity law barristers limited at level 4 44 khyber pass Grafton
The letter head she uses has both law firms named on it . I note that on your roll she used the south Island practitioners phone number but she is not located there and by ringing that number you are given the Auckland number to ring which is the number for equity law.
Julia Leenoh has commenced proceedings on behalf of Orlov , I am a former client of his and he was directed to pay me $30,000 , he has appealed this to the LCRO and also chosen to take me to court for defamation for publishing items which relate to overseas directors who are involved in Money laundering and company fraud. He timed this to coincide with a notice of the LCRO advising that the matter will be dealt with soon.
• The directors whom I wrote about in particular Eric Vanagels and Inta bilder who through the company register trace back to New Zealand and directly to the premises of Equity law.
• Orlov has know that these articles have been there for a year since I drew his attention to them at the time .
• I have amended the posts since he has attacked me in this way to include greater detail of his connection .
Leenoh appears to be being used as a proxy for Orlov . The file is appalling and the statement of claim names Greg Stewart as solicitor on record. However I do not believe that he has seen the file at all . The statement of claim was served without being filed in court . It was served with a notice of proceedings which had not been filed in court and a bundle of irrelevant documents .
A few days later she sent a notice of proceedings by mail with the covering letter as above . We have no way of knowing if the documents filed in court are the same as those which were served on us . We have brought this matter to their attention but it is apparently being ignored .
The proceedings are vexatious and intent to force us to incur a cost in hiring a solicitor due to the matter being high court and their objection to the company being represented by a lay litigant / director .
My complaint is about the manner in which Leenoh is being used as a proxy by Orlov and working under the name of a fictional law firm which uses and Auckland address and an Alexandra phone number
Name: Stewart & Associates Equity Law
Postal Address: PO Box 8333
Locate on Google Maps
Tel: 03 440 4011
Fax: 03 440 4012
please find the relevant documents attached and a photo taken last week of the board in the foyer of 44 Khyber pass road .
In the interest of transparency I am keeping the public up to speed on this matter on the transparency Web site
Open letter / OIA to Minister of Justice
This letter has been published on www.Transparency.net.nz and broadcasted via social media
On that site I am also publicly showing the process as it unfolds it has everything to do with people associated with the Russian Mafia and the setting up of trusts for foreigners through companies associates to struck off lawyer Evgeny Orlov. I have started a page called Legal bullying and will show the players and their actions as they unfold. You may also wish to see the associated article Trusts the greatest vehicle for fraud
This is a very public way of providing you with the insight as to how the wheels have dropped off our legal system- there is nothing like an example and I have to thank Evgeny Orlov, Greg Stewart, George Bogiatto and Julia Leeno for providing you with this example
I also refer to a previous open letter to you “What justice system “ and statement you made in this news article where you stated “it’s a court of law not a court of justice”.
I have become aware through being sued in our courts for speaking the truth and for exposing serious corruption that our courts are on a par with our casinos.Except that our casinos have more security issues in place to prevent abuse.
We apparently fare no better than the Wild West it appears to be a free for all in our courts with no ENFORCEABLE systems or processes to give those taken to court any protection .
When truth and evidence are not factors we cannot have justice. The justice sector by not providing prosecutions for perjury is failing the people
It appears to me, that the course of justice has been averted. Those in the middle income group who own their own houses are a very good target. Their houses are now worth going after and what better way than to bring a massive financial burden on to them, costs which no one can possibly budget for.
This means that those with means and those who are lawyers themselves can totally abuse the court system for their own advantage and write the costs off as a tax advantage while forcing the other party to hire a lawyer .
If you do not hire a lawyer and defend yourself you become prey to the dirty legal tricks which deny justice and which is apparently allowed in our Legal system .
Our Justice sector fails in its task to “to make society safer and provide accessible justice services.”
Court has become a tool of oppression , why use a baseball bat to steal some ones wallet when you can use a lawyer and get their house and anything done through a lawyer is apparently legal .
Truth, evidence and integrity have no place in our courts and it appears that you can bring civil claims based on nothing but hogwash . Once the papers are served it is for your opponent to spend funds on lawyers, money which they cannot recover due to the oppressor cleverly hiding all their assets before they start.
I have experienced instances where the civil jurisdiction is being used to pervert the course of justice.
Police simply won’t act if a matter is before the court and without evidence the civil jurisdiction supported by the total lack of rights to the Universal Declaration of Human rights
Some Lawyers appear to use the court to pervert the cause of justice by using the civil jurisdiction to conceal criminal offending.While it is a crime to beat someone up with a baseball bat it appears to be sanctioned if done with a lawyer and legal tactics.
The fact that immense stress and bullying has health repercussions is not even considered a factor and neither must the person being beaten up show any emotion because that is another black mark against them.
I am a former police prosecutor and through my involvement in the Civil court have found that our bill of rights in New Zealand does not afford the right to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial court to those in the civil jurisdiction this is totally out of step with the Universal declaring of Human rights .
I would By way of OIA request further Documentation and discussion papers which examine
1. Why criminal judgements confidential when all civil judgements are published, are both not equally accountable to the public records act.
2. Why convictions in the criminal jurisdiction are not a matter of public record and accessible to all yet civil matters gets full and permanent publicity
3. Criminals have advantage of the clean slate act yet those in the civil jurisdiction are accountable to the decisions for ever , this appears to be a disparity has this been considered and discussed if not why not
4. What the threshold for perjury is and to what degree that drifting from the truth is acceptable before any one is prosecuted, and who prosecutes when the police are under resourced and overburdened?
5. What consideration the minister of justice has given to the use of the civil jurisdiction to pervert the course of justice in the criminal jurisdiction? – To this end, those engaged in crime tend to have more funds than whistle-blowers. Any one coming across a crime has a choice of becoming an accessory by concealing it or speaking up. When they speak up they find themselves under attack from the “would be” criminal and legal tactics rather than truth and evidence are used to financially cripple them. Law is not affordable to the average person and the costs of being taken to court is crippling it is a tool by which the rich and the corrupt can beat up those who are trying to survive. An hour for a lawyer is a weeks wages for the average New Zealander . Law has got out of hand.
6. If the minister of Justice has no way of delivering justice has the minister considered ways to put justice in place or otherwise renaming the ministry.
Our courts need to give protection to the citizens of this country. To allow the courts to be used in appropriately is an abuse of process which I believe the Minister of Justice should seek to prevent.
I look forward to your response.
I am standing as an Independent for Epsom and will make this an election issue.
Update see response from Judith Collins re justice
the web site www.equitytrust.co.nz is owned by Equity law . Equity Law or equity law barristers Limited is an incorporated law firm whose only director and share holder is Evgenie Orlov a struck off lawyer
see full law society judgements at the bottom of this post
I reported on the same email last year when it had not been titivated by graphic artists, I guess the enhancement means that business is doing well see my item here and also what their charges are News Flash EQUITY TRUST solicits new clients
Any one intending to do business with Equity trust needs to read this international fraud connection with Equity Law .
The equity trust web site is owned by equity law see this Whois Search _ .nz Domain Name Commission
Offshore Director(s) – provided from your side – Offshore Shareholder(s) – provided from your side and apparently you dont even need to know them .
One such director was Mr Erik Vanagels this is apparently how it works
Vanagels was a director of many of the companies associated with equity law and Equity trust ( well over 2000) . The offices of Equity law are the address for registration of the companies here in New Zealand .
By way of illustration one such company BERGSTONE LIMITED is shown on the companies register as having its registered office at Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass Road, Grafton,
the director is Erik VANAGELS Buzon 1987, Zone 9a, Carrasquilla & Via Espana, Panama City, Panama , ( hang on wasn’t Vanangles latvian ?? ) the address used cant be located on google but I did find this EURIMEX CORP. – Business Located in New York no doubt there will be more but I know this all done by smoke screens and mirrors . Bizapaedia claims ” There are 3 companies that have an address matching Buzon 1987 Zone 9a Carrasquilla & Via Espana Panama City, Panama 00000. The companies are Continenta Corp, Finmarket Corp, and Centroform Inc.”
The above flyer sent out by Equity trust International states that they set up companies in Panama
the shareholder of the company is UNIHOLD LIMITED Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1150 , New Zealand director since 10 Aug 2011 Manti EFFROSYNI 11 Stavrou Stylianidi Street, Flat 3, Level 2, Nicosia, 2024 , Cyprus , prior to that Humberto Gregorio BARRERA MOJICA ,Ed Villas De Bonanza, Tower D, Apt. 3c, Panama City , Panama and before that Erik VANAGELS
UNIHOLD’S share holder is GENHOLD LIMITED Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1150 , New Zealand
GENHOLD LIMITED has as its director Fernando Enrique MONTERO DE GRACIA,Calle Primera, Panama Viejo, House 496, Panama City, Republic Of Panama , the share holder is TRUST (NZ) HOLDINGS LIMITED Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023 , New Zealand
Google Eric Vanagles for more details which include links such as
together with Latvian colleagues such as Juri Vitman, Elmar Zallapa and Inta Bilder – preside over a sprawling network of companies with Baltic bank accounts that have extensive dealings with the Ukrainian state, covering everything from arms exports to machinery imports.
Erik Vanagels offshoreleaks.icij.org/nodes/21975
During the same year, another company from New Zealand, Dominus Limited, also transferred about $6 million to Nomirex. These transactions by three seemingly different companies from New Zealand and Panama all have one thing in common: they all have the same directors and owners – Latvian citizens Sten Gorin and Erik Vanagels, who became known as part of controversies involving weapons sales and the supply of swine flu vaccines to Ukraine.
For more on this kind of activity try these links
It would appear that Orlov is seeking to use the court to beat me into silence. Today ( 14 July ) he had two massive bundles of documents served on me not a sworn statement amongst them and also roping in an associate of mine who is totally not involved .
I see this as harassment this is the statement of claim which has been very badly prepared I have written to Greg Stewart email@example.com as below will keep you posted on the page tab Legal bullying I have identified the lawyers involved and have detailed their involvement. noting like transparency.
- will keep you posted .
From: Grace Haden [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Monday, 14 July 2014 3:17 p.m.
Subject: Proceedings by Orlov and co
Good afternoon Greg
I have been served with two very large bundles of documents and a claim for a ridiculous sum by Eugene Orlov.
Strangely enough these came right after the LCRO advised that they were going to be dealing with the matters between us on the papers.
These proceedings are the first that I have known that your client was unhappy with the posts on the web sites
He has been made aware of the posts in the past and he has been invited to suggest changes .
Could You please indicate what changes your client wishes to have made I have amended the anticorruption pages but presently cant log into Transparency to edit it.
If you get him to produce evidence as to why statements made are incorrect and tell me what needs changing I will gladly do so .
The file is not very comprehensible and also lacks affidavits .
Also a friend has been named she is not associated in any way and I wonder why she has been brought into it
I am aware that your client has known about these posts substantially longer than 5 days ago but despite that am happy to make the changes in accordance with section 25 of the defamation act.
I look forward to your prompt response so that this matter can be put right.
Phone (09) 520 1815
mobile 027 286 8239
visit us at www.transparency.net.nz
Recent decisons re Orlov
Companies currently registered at 4/44 Khyber pass
4-WAY LOGISTICS LIMITED (3589351) Registered NZ Company
The former director was the receptionist at equity law when she became uncomfortable and saw what was going on the directorship was transfered to Leah TOURELEO, B.p. 1487, 1 Port Vila, Pot 540208, Port Vila , Vanuatu the shareholder is TRUST (NZ) HOLDINGS LIMITED owned and directed by Orlov’s wife
ARGOSTAR LIMITED (2038680) Registered NZ Company director Anastasia KOUMIDOU Persefonis 8, Flat 301, Aglandjia, Nicosia, 2102 , Cyprus shareholder NORDWELL MANAGEMENT LIMITED whose director Steven James GREEN is a co director of EQUITY TRUST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,shareholder of Nordwell is BRIDGEPOINT AG Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, MH96960 , Marshall Islands – I have been unable to verify the existence of Bridgepoint AG but it apparently has a human signature .. whose I wonder ?
BERGSTONE LIMITED (1871327) Registered NZ Company as mentioned above Director Erik VANAGELS
BEXLEY RISK ADVISORS LIMITED (1875420) Registered NZ Company- Director Manti EFFROSYNI shareholder NORDWELL MANAGEMENT LIMITED whose director Steven James GREEN is a co director of EQUITY TRUST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,shareholder of Nordwell is BRIDGEPOINT AG Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, MH96960 , Marshall Islands – I have been unable to verify the existence of Bridgepoint AG but it apparently has a human signature .. whose I wonder ?
BLACKWILL TRADE LIMITED (3330391) Registered NZ Company director Uatay KABLAN,189 Muratbayeva Street, Apt 18, Almaty , Kazakhstan, shareholder NORDWELL MANAGEMENT LIMITED whose director Steven James GREEN is a co director of EQUITY TRUST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,shareholder of Nordwell is BRIDGEPOINT AG Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, MH96960 , Marshall Islands a company which cannot be located but has a very real looking signature so it must be real.
BORGCAMP LIMITED (2175747) Registered NZ Company director Manti EFFROSYNI share holder Nordwell as above
CARGOTEX LIMITED (2084625) Registered NZ Company Inta BILDER shareholder Maxhold as above in BENTLEX LIMITED
CARGOTRADE LIMITED (3330373) Registered NZ Company director Petr ZIKA this time with shareholder shareholder Nordwell through Mr Green to the unlocatable BRIDGEPOINT AG Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, MH96960 , Marshall Islands
CASS ESTATE LIMITED (2362248) Registered NZ Company Manti EFFROSYNI and the Nordwell progression as above
CLOVER MANAGEMENT LIMITED (2102957) Registered NZ Company Yippy a new name Iosif FRANGOS 57 Spyrou Kyprianou, M Frangos Court 501, 6051 Larnaca, Cyprus who is also the shareholder how unique
More on an attachment coming soon the whole lot will be sent off to the MED for their input.
I am grossly concerned that an alleged company in the Marshall islands can be a shareholder based on an anonymous signature .. more on this later .
I recently did an official information act request to Judith Collins seeking her source of information for being consistently quoted as stating that New Zealand is the least corrupt .
In the response she states that this is the perception index yet far too often she makes the statement as though it is fact and not a mere illusion One such instance is in her address to parliament where she erroneously interprets this to mean ” Corruption free ”
“New Zealand’s reputation for being corruption-free is one of its biggest assets internationally. People who do business and invest in New Zealand know they can trust our laws and our Government to protect their rights and freedoms. New Zealand’s ranking by Forbes as the best country for doing business is in part due to the high trust in our public sector. Well done, New Zealand.”
If the ‘corruption free ” statement was made by a company it would be held accountable under the fair trading act.
National are slapping themselves on the back for the low levels of corruption by actively concealing corruption and preventing people from speaking about it as is evident in this question by MP Grant Robertson 29 May 2014:
I would ask why it is that I am unable to ask a question that is legitimately to the Minister of Justice about the question of corruption and bribery—and I quoted from a Ministry of Justice fact sheet, which describes that as abuse of one’s position of power—and I am not allowed to ask questions about Ministers who bullied somebody—
Ross Robertson will retire for Government this year without seeing his bill Members of Parliament (Code of Ethical Conduct) Bill [PDF 148k] being passed.
Current chair of GOPAC (Global organisation of parliamentarians agaisnt corruption ) is Andrew Little , he has a hard job a head of him when our minister of justice states that we are corruption free and also states ( at 1.05 )that in New Zealand there is no court of justice . To me this is a contradiction of terms .
My petition for a commission agaisnt corruption was presented this week . I have little doubt that it will be viewed seriously for as long as we do not label or define corruption we wont have any .
I have still to hear form John Key with regards to my request to him, I suspect that this has been filed in his drawer until one day he needs to pull it out in a tit for tat trade off against an opposition minister .
National appears to thrive on corruption and to act in the name of corruption would be to clip their own wings .
I have come to the conclusion that a government which will not let you question corruption must be corrupt . Time for a change me thinks.
Last week I was in Brisbane at a conference and work shop co hosted by Griffith University and transparency International -Using Anti-Corruption to Protect Growth and Development in the G20 and Beyond.
Much of the focus of the work shop was to explore the national integrity system ( NIS ) and how various countries had interpreted the guidelines and come out with their reports.
While it was clear that Transparency International saw corruption as the key element it transpired that TINZ ( Transparency International New Zealand ) had not included this in their assessment .
Suzanne Snively made two presentations at one she pointed out that TINZ is not funded and they have trouble getting members, I guess this is evident when new members sign up and immediately become directors . She made no mention of the Members who were leaving because they were so overwhelmed out being outnumbered by the Government agencies which appear to control TINZ and hence the resulting finding that New Zealand has the least corrupt public sector in the world. see the NIS report here
We all do well if we blow our own trumpet , any way Suzanne’s presentations are
Suzanne Snively and Daniel King – A national perspective
Suzanne Snively and Daniel King – Adapting the NIS to a ‘developed’ country: environment, business and the Treaty of Waitangi
When referring to the presentation of Finn Heinrich - Where does it come from? How does it work? What is needed for the future? you can see that he refers to two Crucial Ingredients to provide Momentum for Anti-Corruption Reform they are
- Strong Evidence on Integrity System & Practice
- Engagement with key stakeholders in a country
Lets evaluate these criteria against the current New Zealand Climate
Strong Evidence on Integrity System & Practice
Currently we have a spat going on pre election between our two main parties. It is a Tit for tat and we are slinging mud to repel corruption allegations, this is basically our anti corruption system at work, name calling at school play ground level.
The latest spat has occurred after our minister of justice took time out on her ministerial trip to promote milk for a Chinese company of which her husband has been made director, I have reported on the matter in full at this link
The next blow came to National when Maurice Williamson was discovered to have been supporting the citizenship of Donghua Liu against official advice .
Last year the Mayor of Auckland was caught with his pants down and at the time Mr key had this to say “I’ve had plenty of people who’ve rung me up with information about Labour MPs,” he said.
“And I’ve done the same thing to every person that’s rung me. I’ve written it down, put it in my top drawer and kept it to myself. I’m just not interested in engaging in it.”
It is very obvious that the top drawer has now been opened and they have had to dig deep to find the dirt which they can throw back at labour.
The reality is that the Prime ministers act of keeping dirt in his top drawer is in itself a corrupt act as each and every incident reported to him should be passed on for independent investigation at the time the issue arises and not held on to until a blackmail-able opportunity arises
There simply is no integrity in stockpiling dirt on the opposition – this allows corruption to be traded off with corruption , each act should be independently evaluated and the perpetrators charged if evidence is sufficient.
Engagement with key stakeholders in a country
While Whistleblowers are seen as essential any where else in the world (Grzegorz Makowski – Cross-cutting problems in the NIS: corruption of anti-corruption policies; whistleblower protection; human rights protection) TINZ prefers to ignore us. this is like doing a report on the operations of a company and leaving out the shoppers .
There are two sides to any system, the one looking out and the one looking in. the systems my look in place but if they are not user friendly or are designed to be counter productive against corruption then the system has no integrity .
I would have thought that it would be a serious matter for some one to make an application for law enforcement powers using false information, after all people are taken to task for benefit fraud and the like every day , but it appears that the bigger it is the more people that are implicated and the more systems that are shown to be unsafe then more reasons exist to deny what has happened and simply carry on. look no issue .. too hard lets move on .
The key stake holders on the other hand who were engaged with were the members of TINZ, and the funders , these include Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet
TINZ appears to be too closely aligned with government so much so that those ministers who are engaging on corrupt practices rely on the NIS to refute any claims e.g.
Not bad since her ministry paid to get the report done .
I have again asked Suzanne Snively if I can join TINZ see my email here email application jun 2014 .. will keep you posted