Yesterday I was approached by Net safe , who on behalf of Vivienne Holm sought changes to former blog posts because Vivienne after holding a practicing certificate for the past 10 years suddenly cant get one because of something that was written many years ago . Vivienne is seeking changes to the blog. We are happy to make corrections but there is nothing to correct . we are interested however in addressing injustices and if she feels that the comment is an injustice then she can assit in correcting a far greater injustice before we look at the perception she has of tiny little one .
Summary of Blogs which mention Vivienne
The following is my response to Net safe , The fact that Vivienne and Malcolm North who has been harassing me, both worked at the ministry of social development is a fact that is not lost on me .
….Thank you net safe
The animal welfare Institute of New Zealand (AWINZ ) had law enforcement powers which it obtained after an application was made to the then minister of agriculture on 22 November 1999 .
A blank trust deed had been attached to the application made by Neil Edward wells a barrister .
In reality ,No trust existed and no entity existed but the government gave AWINZ wide sweeping law enforcement powers akin to those held by the RNZSPCA, which includes search and seizure and ability to fine people .
Neil Wells who applied on behalf of AWINZ had written the no 1 bill for the new Animal welfare act and had inserted the sections to facilitate the application he subsequently made and he also advised on the act as “independent advisor” to the select committee without declaring his obvious conflict of interest of writing an act to facilitate his own business plan
In March 2006 an employee of Waitakere city council Lynne McDonald ( the bird lady ) approached me with the concern that she, a dog control officer, was required to “ volunteer “ her council paid time to AWINZ and prioritise animal welfare over dog control . The building at the council had been rebranded and Neil wells her council manager from 2005 was the only person operating AWINZ for which he used a logo which was identical to the new branding of the council building .
Maf at the time of an audit acknowledged that the two entities appeared to merge and it was difficult to see where one began and the other finished. The council on the other hand denied that AWINZ operated from their premises . This was in reality a massive public fraud using public office for private pecuniary gain.
To prove that AWINZ did not exist several of us incorporated the name Animal Welfare institute of New Zealand .It is impossible to incorporate the identical name of an entity, we were successful there by conclusively proving that AWINZ the law enforcement authority did not exist .
Vivienne Holm @ Vivienne Parr @ Vivienne Wright Phoned me late at night and made threats against my Private investigators licence and there by my income and livelihood. She demanded that we had to give up the name AWINZ when intimidation did not work Her then husband Nick wright then took over the matter as Vivienne at the time was working as a law clerk .
I called at her address to discuss a resolution and was promptly served with a trespass notice.
Now it has always puzzled me why a Law clerk was instructed , surely that is not usual and why was her first port of call be an intimidating phone call late on a Friday night .. I thought that a legitmaley instructed person would use more transparent means rather than acting like a thug.
After her husband , a resource management lawyer , became involved Threats of legal action were made and out of the blue a trust deed materialised.
I was to find that the trust deed dated 1.3.2000 had been signed when the then dog control manager at Waitakere city council, Tom Didovich visited the various people who thought they were trustees.
However they never met never passed a resolution and certainly were not involved in the application for the “ approved organisation’ under section 121 of the animal welfare act ( which Neil wells had had such a massive part in ), the trust they were allegedly involved in held no assets and after three years the trustees who still had not met were not reappointed, hence this was a totally sham trust
Nick Wright took me to court for defamation , for saying that AWINZ was a sham trust, which it was and has proved to be . The defamation was allegedly of Neil Wells , I was denied the right to a statutory defence of truth and honest opinion and no finding has ever been made that I defamed Neil wells but I had to pay some $100,000 to him and his lawyer all for being a whistle-blower on serious corruption .
This went on for some 10 years the object was to bankrupt me . Neil wells in an email to MAF in 2007 said that this was his objective , he certainly tried hard enough
Nick wright who is reputedly the “Auckland lawyer who had “fallen on hard times”( http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/77079681/auckland-lawyer-awarded-14000-from-police-over-false-arrest-imprisonment) has ceased practicing and Brookfields continued their attack on me, I can only guess that if they had done the decent thing they would have seen some notable lawyers struck off for not checking the facts before filing matters in court and using their office contrary to the provisions of the Lawyers and conveyancers rules .
In the process of suing me they used dirty tactics because facts and evidence would not have won it for them . I have reason to believe that that also worked covertly on my marriage and ensured that my 23 years marriage and my family was destroyed. The lawyer who represented me was later found to be incompetent and I very much suspect he was working for the other side . So I lost , no way of winning when you have a lawyer who the law society acknowledged as being incompetent and for whom judges had no respect .
All in all this created a massive miscarriage of justice and one which I physically paid out well over $300,000 for and find it impossible to quantify the lost hours of work, health stress etc.
Brookfields, on behalf of whom Vivienne Wright at the time,(previously Vivienne Parr now Vivienne Holm) , took instructions from the fictional AWINZ tried to liquidate my company and succeeded until I found out that they had filed a false affidavit of service and the whole thing was reversed.
So now 10 years down the track and after having held many practicing certificates Vivienne wants a different type of practicing certificate because she is going to work for Paul Cavanagh who retired exactly a year ago .
Vivienne “ believes “ that she already had her application in . I am sure that she did not.( this is based on my concurrent records )
I believe that my post is totally accurate and that the fact of the date of her application for a practicing certificate is just a teensy weensy bit trivial compared to the years of suffering which I and my family have had to endure.
The good news is that I am happy to work with any one who helps put things right . When the AWINZ matter has been addressed and is history I can take down all the posts but while the injustice exists it requires exposure of the fact and the facts will remain in the public realm
I cannot understand why she claims that she cannot get a practicing certificate on this occasion , the email you sent is dated 19 September 2016 and states that she has held a practicing certificate from April 2015 to the present .
Practicing certificates renew at the end of June , The law society have just informed me that she does not currently hold a practicing certificate, her last one expired 25 November 2016, it appears that that is the date when she left the MSD
My internet search reveals that Paul Cavanagh QC retired a year ago .
It would appear that Vivienne Holm now wants to work in public practice again , as such she will become an officer of the high court and according to section 4 of the Lawyers and conveyancers act will have an obligation to uphold the rule of law and to facilitate the administration of justice in New Zealand:
She may wish to help address the AWINZ injustice , once that has been sorted I can look at removing / altering blogs .
I do find it amusing perhaps coincidental perhaps not , that she was employed by MSD until 25 November where Malcolm North who has been harassing me, by email also works.
But getting back to Vivienne I am happy to remove anything minor when a greater injustice has been resolved, she only needs to contact me and help me right the wrongs of the past that she was instrumental in in kicking off . A person with integrity would see that an as officer of the court Vivienne would have an overriding obligation to justice and if she cannot how integrity in putting the past right then she should not be asking me to change factual information .
In the interest of transparency I will be publishing this on Transparency.net.nz
In august this year my PI licence was up for renewal , I appeared before the ” authority ” on a matter which should never have been accepted as a complaint let alone be investigated and go as far as a hearing.
Malcolm North had made a complaint under the code of conduct of Private investigators. He did not like the fact that I was assisting, the person who I believe is victim of his crimes, in limiting damages .
There was but one problem there is only one code of conduct and that is with regards to surveillance.
I was under investigations by the DIA for some 10 months they kept telling me that I was under investigation for breach of code of conduct. and in the end they published a most defamatory report which their spin doctors have defended to the hilt to justify their investigations .
I was called before the PSPLA and the ” authority ” did he only thing he could do and dismissed the complaint
While I was before this hearing, which actually did not have a valid complaint to hear , the Authority Roger Gill asked to speak to me off the record . he did so and I recorded our conversation for future reference .
I was told by him that he did not consider me to be an appropriate person to hold a licence , I was told that I had to stop blogging and stop making complaints to the law society about lawyers or else I would not have a certificate of approval ( COE). I wrote to him and advised him of my rights under the bill of right both to the freedom of expression and freedom to form and hold opinions.
My COE was supposed to renew on the 16th August. On the 12th august I received a registered mail item, it was an on the papers decision on my application. It had been declined.
There were a number of historic items listed mainly hearsay and unsupported by real evidence , others were items which I should have had a right of explanation on. One was
ThI must admit this one had me thinking
There was never a Restraining order but I did get a trespass notice after I had served papers at 5 Beech place a notice to remove defamatory material from a web site .
until this week it never clicked and then I saw a most interesting item on face book a link which led to this
WELL is this ever an exercise in self promotion / sensationalism , I was most interested to read the words on her scoop post
“The targeting of Ms Dawson led to serious threats against and endangerment of her life and those of her children.”
suddenly I connected the two and indeed in early 2013 I had had dealings with one and the same Ms Dawson when she published defamatory and blatantly incorrect material about me and I simply asked her to remove it from her blogand when I was ignored served a notice on her as required by the act.
I had phoned her as first point of contact and her daughter had answered the phone , I asked for Suzie Dawson and when she got on the phone she hurled a barrage of abuse at me and a claim that I was stalking her .
Eventually she did remove the material from her post but it wold appear that she also made a false complaint that I was stalking her.
Knowing what I know about Suzie Dawson and having interacted with her , I do hope that she gets asylum in Russia and may her stay be a lengthy one.
I personally would not believe a thing she says as to me ,on the evidence I have , I can conclude that she is prone to gross exaggeration and paranoia .
She calls herself a journalist but she is not one .
If she is one of the 88 new Zealanders the government is looking at then the government is wasting tax payers funds , it is my opinion that she does nothing more than regurgitates information which she finds on the web and publishes as her own .
Please don’t give her money , in doing so you will be supporting a potential fraud. her web sites are https://twitter.com/HelpSuzi3D , https://twitter.com/Suzi3D, contraspin.co.nz,www. endarken.co.nz, http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sp9co7, suziedawson.co.nz, spinbin.co.nz, occupysavvy.wordpress.com , https://vimeo.com/181517859, https://winstonclose.me/2016/06/19/the-oppression-of-the-internet-is-global-by-suzie-dawson/, https://twitter.com/ redstar309z,
a clue to what she is up to is here
Since joining the Occupy Auckland media team in 2011, Suzie Dawson has been a driving force behind many social justice and political movement media campaigns and events, including #GCSB, #NZ4Gaza and #TPPANoWay. Her work has been shared internationally including by RT.com, Wikileaks and Business Insider. She is currently traveling the world and writing about her experiences.
The reality is that Occupy Auckland is done and dusted.. Suzie is a self appointed journalist and is funding her overseas travels by blogging and turning herself into an international person of interest. It would appear that she has sold her Beeche place home. The fact that she sold then traveled the globe gives more clarity to the statement
“Kiwi journalist and activist Suzie Dawson has been extensively targeted by Western intelligence agencies and their contractors. In the wake of several overt attempts on her life, she had to leave her home in New Zealand to live in exile in Europe“
Now Suzie which is it did you sell up and go on a trip or were you forced to leave .. at least you should be consistent in what you post .. hope you are enjoying your cool million please dont ask people to fund your holiday its not ethical
Today was supposed to be a day in the garden but this morning a friend sent me a link to lauda Finem
I have had to have a giggle over the article as it parallels what is going on in my life .. believe me though it is no laughing matter its probably more of a Yeh Im not the only one on to it giggle
in 2006 I discovered that the animal welfare institute of New Zealand ( awinz).. an approved organisation under the animal welfare act with coercive search and seizure powers.. did not exist. I was taken to court for defamation ..denied a defence of truth and honest opinion . they attacked my marriage my family and spat me out the other end. All in the name of concealment of corruption
Next up were the directors of fresh prepared , represented by Peter Spring of Keegan Alexander .. these news items speak volumes Boss invents accountant to escape $60k debt and Charges over alleged fake liquidator Yes I had discovered the lack of existence of the director l and the liquidator.. this made me a threat to society and was taken to court for harassment , I had not done anything but they came up with things like ..last night the bosses truck was broken into we thought it was her , then we found it wasn’t.
I took on a human rights lawyer .He stripped me of serious cash then took me to court for harassment because of what I knew . , I had not even breathed a word but he feared what he thought I knew .. yes the equivalent of the panama papers but three years earlier . It is no surprise that now has a Panamanian address and is no longer a lawyer in NZ .
The court has sorted that one out with its invisibility cloak .. I am not allowed to use his name and looking back I am not sure who he was working for it certainly was not for me
Next Neil Wells the man behind AWINZ succeeded in getting my company liquidated, he did this by using translegal to not served papers on me , so I was blissfully unaware of the action until it was too late. I caught the document server out and the liquidation was reversed. A lady contacted me and they were trying to take one of her children away from her they were the the parents of the sperm donor ( now deceased ) they decided that they wanted the child so the proceedings were commenced using a trans legal document server , who had 30 previous convictions for dishonesty and is still in the business. She did not get an apology I did at the direction of hte court they were supposed to put it on their web page but took it down in a flash here is the translegal-apology
The next to sue me for harassment was another lawyer one who was representing Muse on Allen.. of the law firm Johnston Lawrence Limited , I made the fatal mistake of telling him that he should act according to the rule of law and not support criminal action . The directors of muse on Allen Malcolm North , Debbie north and Samuel North , had transferred shares representing a young mans total investment in a company into the name of Samuel north they called this an “error ” I pointed out that after three years ” errors” can no longer be called ” errors “if they are acknowledged and not corrected. .. that worth taking harassment action over.. guess it prevents a claim of using your office to facilitate fraud. the lawyer had himself removed from the court action in a confidential application to the court .
The strategy which was played out was very clever and by introducing un substantiated allegations of defamation at the 11th hour, filed and bypassing me for any comment . Playing this game they got a restraining order when I missed the court date as they had conveniently not served that document on me and had at the last minute lulled me into believing that an undertaking would suffice .
When I had the judgement recalled , the directors of the law firm Johnston Lawrence Limited went out of their way to misdirect the court . fortunately the law society are looking into their action . Defamtion has a statute of its own and defamation has to be pleaded , it cant be alleged. there is a defence of truth and honest opinion for defamation , but when you are denied that right of defence it leaves you sadly lacking and fiction becomes fact e.g. a non existent animal welfare institute of New Zealand becomes the emperors new clothes.
The next one who has been threatening defamation action is the man who does not know how to stop harassing ;-Malcolm North who is up to his neck in what I have proved to be is dubious company activity ( truth ) having defrauded a young man from some $64,000 so that his own son can claim to be the youngest top chef and set up a restaurant without any funds except those he ” acquired ” through the unlawful stroke of a pen .
Malcolm North is particularly keen that I tell the world that My Private investigators certificate was not renewed. Well why should I when this has been over turned on appeal , he is now seeking advice from the PSPLA on how to object once again , he is beavering away in the back ground spying on me and looking at all possible ways to discredit me and cost me income .
This is where today’s item was very timely not only does it mention the use of the court by the corrupt but it shows the failings of a PI registration system .
I am, apparently, in the opinion of the ” authority ” not a suitable person to be a PI because the ” authority’ did not like me blogging or making complaints about lawyers .. I have the voice recording for any one who wants to confirm this … he ( Roger Gill ) told me in an unofficial meeting that unless I stop blogging and making complaints about lawyers that I would not get a certificate of approval . I felt that that was a tad blackmailish and have a firm belief in the right to hold an opinion and for the freedom of expression .
So it came as a bit of a surprise to see that Danny Thompson has got his approval through despite not having declared previous convictions , I am also aware of others with convictions who hold PI Licences of COE’s including Gary Swan who was exonerated for facilitating false affidavits of service but because I speak up against corruption I am a danger to society
the reasons for declinature.. for which the authority dug deep were
- the allegation that I was warned for blackmail by the police .. this was not the case and the PSPLA actually had no documents at all to support this allegation.
- I had allegedly stalked a woman and her daughter, this was conveniently an anonymous complaint and even thought it allegedly occurred in 2012 was never investigated it was enough to count against me .. I have a rough idea who the vindictive bitch was
- then a matter which the Pspla had already sat on and dismissed was reconsidered and counted for 2 matters the fact that the woman involved, one Parrisa Hamedi was living in a housing corp house in Nelson while claiming to be in a defacto relationship in Auckland is beside the point;- the object of the exercise was to claim as many assets with as few possible bonks. The lawyer involved Steven Zindel took her claim to court just when the victim was getting married .There was no evidence of defacto relationship , she was still living with her children and ex husband and collecting $$$$ from our government and used legal aid to try and facilitate what I consider to be a fraud. . Both Zindel and Parisa Hamedi took me to the Pspla because I told him that Zindel had an obligation to ensure that he did not use the court for an attempted fraud and I also provided evidence that there was no defacto relationship . I came to this conclusion four years before the court came to the same conclusion but on the plus side many lawyers including Zindel made a few bob on the way all courtesy of the tax payer .
- then last but not least the Johnson Lawrence matter was hurled in my face.
I have to add that on each of the above allegations I was not given a chance to comment and it was a Fait Accompli as far as the authority was concerned
In the appeal papers the PSPLA had included yet another matter one of Dr Gerald Waters who had complained about my action You can read all about him here yes another crim using the court to fight back
So what it all comes down to is that the court is being used as a weapon of choice to conceal fraud corruption and crime , it is a tool used by the corrupt ;Tar the person who is most likely to expose you and you could get away Scott free.
All I have ever wished for is for half as much investigation to have gone into AWINZ and Muse on Allen as has gone into me for standing by the victims of crime . This can only lead me to believe that our society supports corruption
The private security licencing authority is of the opinion that I believe in some sort of conspiracy ( his words not mine ) . The reality is that when you look for coruppion you find it very easily because there is so much of it. the only way to not see it is to walk about with your eyes closed or be part of the problem
Well when I read Lauda Finem and this latest matter I don’t have to think that there is some sort of corruption lurking in the justice system; I know there is . I have spoken to people whose properties have been stolen from them by Lawyers who ensured that documents conveniently went missing from files . they are trusted and believable and officers of the court .. they would not do that….or would they ?????
Its like magic if you believe something has integrity then you wont think it can happen… but its all sleight of hand and concealment and integrity that isn’t actually there
Blogs take the magic away that is why we must be stopped. While ” they” control the news , they cant control us . yesterday I heard on the news that we must not believe what is in blogs .. well I’m not certain if we should actually believe the news either
No one will take away my right to blog I do so pursuant to my rights under the bill of rights. I report the truth which apparently is frowned upon. I wonder why ?
This week has been a big week for Malcolm North He appeared in the Wellington High court bankruptcy court. He has apparently come home to have another go at me, I am becoming very tired of his bullying behaviour and find the only way to deal with him is through this site
I have responded in Red
From: malcolm north [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Thursday, 10 November 2016 6:06 p.m.
Subject: Defamatory Information.
I have requested you before to remove the defamatory information from your website and so far you have not done this I don’t have a problem with factual information so can you either remove it or amend it.
Malcolm I have responded to you and advised you that truth is never defamatory. I responded on 30 September , if you care to look at the act you will note that you are grossly out of time however with respect to the following I will address them
- I am not a Business Development Manager with Ministry of Social Development. Not true.
the words used were ” I believe” I may have got that wrong looking at your earlier emails which were sent from your business email you the following so perhaps you still hold that position
Phone: 0800-778-008 DDI 049137535
- Debbie had no input into setting up the business ( please provide evidence that she did )
Please refer to the companies register on the 17th August she completed and uploaded her own directors documents back dating them to the date the company was formed Director Consent
apparently it is an offence under the companies act to do that and also there are no resolutions which allow her to even be appointed as director but then that has never made any difference .
Even when she worked for the Dental council she allegedly managed to get a dentist removed from the roll without following process .
- The matter has been before the courts for 4 years not 2 years. Not true.
sorry I erred on the side of caution .. how is that defamatory ?
- The Police have advised on 2 occasions not 4 that we should refrain from emailing you .Not true
It would appear that it doesn’t matter how many time you get told you keep on emailing.. this is harassment
- You are correct that Joszef contributed $65,000 towards setting up the business but you have failed to supply evidence where the balance of the purchase price and further capital came from .If you read the 2012 /2013 you will see a further $79,147 was introduced please provide evidence that this is not the case.
The 2013 and 2014 annual accounts show no introduction of equity annual accounts It shows loans which is an introduction of debt and Samuel actually took out more money in the business than he had invested.
It appears to me that you do not grasp the concept of equity and loans
- Please provide evidence that we have defrauded Joszef because we have not seen any.
You went home to your flat and without giving the proper notice had a cozy meeting and threw Jozsef out Particulars of Director the resolution you passed is here directors-resolution-dated-10-january-2013 note that it is signed by Debbie
Debbie and Samuel were directors when Jozsefs majority share holding was reduced through no legal means for the shares to be transferred from Jozsef to samuel when there was no paperwork or transactions to facilitate that Shareholder Consent Form transferred shares here to 49% and then when you were director took all his shares Here . In my experience and my opinion it is fraudulent to claim shares which have not been legally transferred and the person owning them has not received compensation or consented to the the transfer .
As directors of the company you had a legal obligation to oversee the share register and in my humble opinion , by allowing this to continue you became parties to the offence as well as committing offences under the companies act
You then represented the company in court proceedings and passed yourself off as a lawyer and claimed that the shares were transferred in ” error” but despite this and over the period of four years you never made any attempts to correct the alleged ” error ”
- You are correct about the ownership of the BMW can you please provide evidence that this was paid for from Muse on Allen funds.
The ownership of the vehicle shows that it was owned by Muse on Allen , there was a security interest agaisnt it in the name of Muse on allen
the vehicle was then transfered to the ownership of Catering Limited and the PPSR remained with Muse on allen but changed some months later .
the registration of the BMW is now 1 Muse 1
- We have seen no evidence of bullying yourself and Joszef by myself and Samuel can you please provide this.
It is sad that you do not know what bullying is, the many horrible emails which you have sent the personal comments the below the belt statements are privately recorded , only the police have copies of them , they were sufficient for them to warn you a number of times
- Your concerns to my employers have been thoroughly investigated and no action has been taken against me.
Time will tell
- Could you please provide evidence that Muse on Allen was run into the ground.
Where do I begin
The company is in liquidation
It owes $160,000 see here
I could go on but it would be boring
I am receiving calls at my employment about your behaviour in the Hawkes Bay so contrary to what you might think the publicity you are giving me is probably not in your favour.
Now that would be boring why would any one want to call you about me , But I guess that would be the same way as people phoning me about the three of you
but don’t you think that the statement you have just made is not bullying ?????? I think it is
Trusting this is not seen as bullying as it is not intended to be as it is only a opportunity for you to amend your postings before I go to the expense to proceed with defamation proceedings against you.
Yes I do see it as bullying , I wont be amending anything I think that this explanation should serve any discerning reader . Long live transparency
I believe that Malcolm North is a Business development manger with the ministry of social development .
In 2012 he and his wife Debbie North and son Samuel North , used a young Hungarian chef to fund the setting up of the Muse on Allen restaurant. Once they had his money they turned on him and removed his as director and transferred all his shares into Samuel’s name .
The matter had been before the court for some 2 years when the lawyers advised that the company was insolvent . by this stage Jozsef had spent $50,000 on top of the 64,000 which had been stolen from him .
I prepared complaints for the police and for the registrar of companies they can be found here Offences . The evidence is available on request but due to the bulk of the evidence I have not placed it on the web site .
Neither the police nor registrar of companies would act because the matter is before the court , the fact that it is before the court under section 174 of the companies act appears to be beside the point and the many serious imprison-able offences are on the back burner probably awaiting the statute of limitations to pass .
Because I appear to be the only person who has focused on the criminal aspect Malcolm has had it in for me.
I have reported his actions and those of his son to the police many times and I think they are up to warning 4 .
Just a few weeks ago Malcolm sought to cast aspersions on me with a business group that I belong to , I responded by sending an open letter to his wife Debbie whose actions facilitated this whole mess right at the beginning.
Now Malcolm has threatened legal action alleging defamation . It is therefore appropriate for me to respond in terms of section 25 of the defamation act
the following are the statements which Malcolm alleges to be defamatory . Truth and honest opinion are never defamatory , truth may be inconvenient but in the end we are all accountable to the truth
I have for each statement produced the evidence which I rely on
The only equity in the business was the funds which Jozsef introduced. Truth the evidence is the 2014 accounts . as can be seen by the end of 2014 the only equity in the company was Jozsef’s funds , Samuel actually had a deficit .
In my professional opinion and based on the evidence I have collated I am of the opinion that all three of you should be locked up for defrauding Jozsef.
Honest opinion based on 15 years policing experience and 13 years as a private investigator see the offences as shown above
Samuel is still driving the BMW which he purchased using the money which he made out of Muse on allen and he has now transferred the ownership to Catering limited.
Truth I will supply the registration documents and the ppsr’s. they can be found here as shown to Muse on Allen here BMW and transferred to catering co Here bmw-1muse1 note also the number plate change but the chassis no etc are the same good to see that a young man who has just put a company into liquidation can afford a personalised plate the regos are.
The three of you have defrauded Jozsef , you have allowed Muse on Allen to be run into the ground and have left a trail of debts.
Honest opinion based on 15 years policing experience and 13 years as a private investigator offences and the credit report of Muse . here muse-on-allen-credit-check not the defaults and also the fact that the company is now in liquidation see here
Throughout this time and to this date you have stood by and allowed your son and husband to bully and abuse both Jozsef and myself.
Truth the police have warned him at least three times you have apparently done nothing but duck for cover
I have communicated my concerns about Malcolm’s behaviour to the ministry of social development I do not believe that persons who practices this level of bullying that in his private life , does not display those same qualities at work .
Honest opinion the degree of bullying which we have suffered is unbelievable there are many emails in which they have made the most cruel remarks to me , I am totally fed up with their bullying behaviour
Often what is not objected to proves more than you realise. In this case Malcolm North by not claiming these statements to be defamatory admits to them as fact
1. I am writing to you in the hope that we may be able to sort out the bullying which I have been suffering at the hands of you husband and son.
2.Jozsef and Sam were the only directors when the company was formed. You were to be an alternate director for Samuel and you completed your own forms and backdated your directorship to day one . If you were to ask any one at the companies office they would tell you that this is not a lawful way to do things as you cannot appoint yourself director
3.With your son You then appointed Malcolm your husband to be a further director then all three of you went home and passed a resolution to remove Jozsef as director
4.As a director of the company you allowed Samuel to transfer all of Jozsefs shares into his own name without any legal basis and without the introduction of further equity into the company .
5.Through out this time and to this date you have stood by and allowed your son and husband to bully and abuse both Jozsef and myself.
6. we have made complaints to the police under the harmful digital communications act and despite the fact that they have been warned a number of time the abuse has continued
7. Last Year Malcolm made a complaint against my private investigators licence , there was no substance in his complaint
8. His vexatious complaints had me under investigation for some 10 months
9 Now he is sending emails to people associated with my business
10 If the police did their job and were not busy dealing with traffic the three of you would beheld fully answerable to the law .
11.I realize that attack is the best form of defence and that is exactly the only defence which your son and husband have
12.Debbie how about some integrity you work for counselors how about getting some counselign for your boys so that they can see that what they are doing is pure bullying and totally un ethical.
This is an open letter to Debbie North Wife of Malcolm North mother of Samuel North
Debbie I am writing to you in the hope that we may be able to sort out the bullying which I have been suffering at the hands of you husband and son.
I find it quite Ironic that you work for “The New Zealand Association of Counsellors “ and are listed as Debbie North email@example.com on their web site
In 2012 Samuel opened a restaurant Muse on Allen with Jozsef Szekely
Jozsef put in $64,000 and became a 70 % share holder due to the fact that the business had been purchased for $90,000 .
The only equity in the business was the funds which Jozsef introduced.
Jozsef and Sam were the only directors when the company was formed. You were to be an alternate director for Samuel and you completed your own forms and backdated your directorship to day one . If yo were to ask any one at the companies office they would tell you that this is not a lawful way to do things as you cannot appoint yourself director.
With your son You then appointed Malcolm your husband to be a further director then all three of you went home and passed a resolution to remove Jozsef as director .
As a director of the company you allowed Samuel to transfer all of Jozsefs shares into his own name without any legal basis and without the introduction of further equity into the company .
Court action followed and you eventually resigned as director in November 2014
Through out this time and to this date you have stood by and allowed your son and husband to bully and abuse both Jozsef and myself.
we have made complaints to the police under the harmful digital communications act and despite the fact that they have been warned a number of time the abuse has continued
Last Year Malcolm made a complaint against my private investigators licence , there was no substance in his complaint and the authority reported
His vexatious complaints had me under investigation for some 10 months
Now he is sending emails to people associated with my business
Hello I warned you before Is this the type of person you want in your chapter
Debbie I have had enough of this .
the three of you have defrauded Jozsef , you have allowed Muse on Allen to be run into the ground and have left a trail of debts.
Samuel is still driving the BMW which he purchased using the money which he made out of Muse on Allen and he has now transferred the ownership to Catering limited.
If the police did their job and were not busy dealing with traffic the three of you would beheld fully answerable to the law .
In my professional opinion and based on the evidence I have collated I am of the opinion that all three of you should be locked up for defrauding Jozsef.
I realize that attack is the best form of defence and that is exactly the only defence which your son and husband have
Debbie how about some integrity you work for counselors how about getting some counselign for your boys so that they can see that what they are doing is pure bullying and totally un ethical.
I have communicated my concerns about Malcolm’s behavior to the ministry of social development I do not believe that persons who practices this level of bullying that in his private life , does not display those same qualities at work .
PLEASE HELP STAMP OUT BULLYING AND FRAUD .
Muse Eatery is it or is it not connected to Muse on Allen ?or what does this say about Samuel Norths integrity ?
Let us play a game of Truth or lies We won’t tell you which is which But lets just look at the facts the following are statements made in the news item highlighted above click here for the article
“The former Muse on Allen restaurant has been put into liquidation”. see the answer here well that was straight forward enough but now lets try this one
Owner Samuel North says it is not connected to his new business, Muse Eatery and Bar, on Victoria St.
Lets look at the web page for Muse eatery lets look at the about page
do you see what I see ?
But in the article Samuel North claims are reported as
His current business Muse Eatery & Bar on Victoria St was not connected to the liquidated business, he said.
It was owned by Catering Limited, of which he is the sole director.
Catering limited was incorporated 03 Dec 2015 so How could Muse eatery , owned by Catering limited have won the above awards the news items clearly show that these awards were for Muse on Allen?
Samuel was indeed very fortunate to have Sarah Meikle as a friend see here read more about her here Five Minutes with Visa Wellington On a Plate director Sarah Meikle.
the trip advisor reviews https://www.facebook.com/MuseEateryBar/app/254084314702229/ are coincidentally all those of Muse on Allen see here
I particularly love the way that in the midst of the article which claims that “Muse Eatery & Bar on Victoria St was not connected to the liquidated business”( muse on allen ) there are several links being
notable quotes are
“Muse On Allen restaurant has been at the address for three and a half years, but will reopen at 56 Victoria St, formerly home to 3C Bar and Restaurant.”
“When the restaurant reopens in the first week of March, it’ll be serving lunch for the first time in addition to dinner, with plans for a breakfast service, too.”
Muse’s new look
Muse’s success continues
Muse has been open for a month at its new Victoria St premises
Now is a good time now to visit Facebook the link is found at the bottom of the Muse eatery web site https://www.facebook.com/MuseEateryBar/ keep scrolling
7 April 2016
Muse On Allen restaurant has been at the address for three and a half years, but will reopen at 56 Victoria St, formerly home to 3C Bar and Restaurant.
Muse owner and director Samuel North says the new space offers the restaurant a chance to expand its services.
Since opening the fine dining establishment as a 21-year-old, North has grown Muse into an award-winning success story.
When the restaurant reopens in the first week of March, it’ll be serving lunch for the first time in addition to dinner, with plans for a breakfast service, too.
Muse’s trademark purple decor will remain, as will its seven staff and favourite dishes such as the beef tartare, tuna sashimi, and creme brulee with doughnuts.
The high-ceilinged, bamboo-floored space in Victoria St is double the size of Muse’s original premises more
by the way notice anything about the Logos ?
now look at theat the bottom of this post you can see the domain names museonallen.co.nz is registered at the domain name registry and shows this full record saved for prosperity here “museonallen.co.nz” (Active) _ Domain Name Commission is recorded to Malcolm@museeatery.co.nz
museeatery.co.nz is the web site which Samuel Norths “new” restaurant uses
Samuel North uses the email address firstname.lastname@example.org his father Malcolm uses email@example.com
this is what happens when you look up muserestaurant.co.nz or see the preserved hard copy here “muserestaurant.co.nz” (Active) _ Domain Name Commission
Strangely enough the domain name was registered to Jozsef Szekely who happens to be the person who sank his life savings into Muse of Allen before being removed by Samuel, Malcolm and Debbie north as a director see here
Samuel then transferred all of Jozsefs shares into his own name in two steps here and here when no corresponding transaction had occurred in the actual company books and when Jozsef was the only person to have equity in the company see here this is why there was a court matter “After court North said his the debt stemmed from a legal battle he had with a business partner when Muse first opened” Jozsef basically took offence to being ripped off to the tune of $64,000. strange that the bill to IRD is about that size .. coincidence ?
we do hope that the liquidators look at the accounts closely we are not book keepers but the accounts for Muse on Allen certainly appear to have more than one issue.
we don’t know what you think but we are pretty certain that muse on Allen and Muse eatery are one and the same .
This post is prompted by the Editorial: NZ needs to assure world of trust scrutiny.
It is one which I will forward along with other blogs to international agencies who may wish to question how one of the worlds least corrupt countries can make this claim and I wish to reveal how trusts work in New Zealand
In 2006 I questioned the lack of existence of trust , this trust just happened to be one of two private law enforcement agencies, this trust the animal welfare institute of New Zealand (AWINZ ) taught me all you need to know about NZ trusts and how loosely they operate
AWINZ operated as an equivalent to the RNZSPCA and enforced animal welfare law , It had powers of search and the ability to seize some ones prized pet .
I was asked the simple question , who is AWINZ ? when I discovered that it was nothing but a sham and questioned the existence of a sham trust being a law enforcement authority I was immediately sued, denied a defence and was told to pay some $100,000 dollars to the person who wrote the animal welfare bill and was independent adviser to the select committee in the process of making his business plan , law .
He then made an application , which in my days as a police officer would have been considered fraud . ( this is due to the fact that the claim that AWINZ was a trust was totally false the application made 22 November 1999 predated he formation of any organisation by that name the earliest trust deed and one which Mr Wells relies upon was dated 1.3.2000 and even those persons never met or passed a resolution )
I have for years been beaten up for blowing this whistle. Below I have a list of links of how I have beaten my head against a brick wall for many years but for now I will reveal how New Zealand trusts work
- You need a trust deed .. it doesn’t matter when you sign it or who signs it as long as there is a deed a bit of paper which looks convincing.
- you can have various copies of the deed they can all conflict and no one cares see here and here
- no one enforces the deed, no one cares if the so called trust complies with its deed
- If you want a new deed you simply write a new one and refer to an earlier deed which may or may not have existed , Ird does not care I rather suspect that most people at IRD are number crunchers and done understand the legalities of dates names and real persons being involved in a trust .
- there is more information on the deed with regards to the identity of the witnesses than with regards to the the trustees. you can use generic names and who could ever identify the trustees
- if a trust does not meet or hold any assets or pass any resolutions it is still considered a trust and its identity can be used to interchange with any other trust ( real or fictional )
- the charities commission are happy to grant charity status to anything whihc meets their criteria , the fact that there are no resolutions for the trust and big gaping holes in their existence is but a technicality
Let me explain in terms of the AWINZ trust
As stated earlier Neil Wells a barrister at the time made an application for law enforcement powers for AWINZ he claimed on 22 November 1999 that a trust had been formed
No executed trust deed existed and these people had not formally met together or passed any resolution
Maf and The dog control section of Waitakere council had signed agreements with the representative of AWINZ:- Neil Wells
in 2006 Neither MAF nor Waitakere city council had a trust deed or had seen one : basically no one had checked the existence of AWINZ
when I proved that AWINZ did not exist ( charitable trusts need to be registered ) a trust deed materialized dated 1.3.2000 whihc brings about the question how can you make an application before a trust is formed. ?
I was to get evidence that these people had never met never held any assets , never passed a resolution.
By the terms of the deed the trust ceased to exist three years after it was formed, continuance depended on reappointment of trustees and since they never met no one was reappointed.
Wells sought charitable status in 2006 when new legislation came in. IRD rejected the trust deed so he simply wrote a new one and they claimed to be a continuation of the bogus 2000 trust
this was totally acceptable to the lawyers charity commission and MAF ( and later the government )
AWINZ was finally removed as approved Organisation in 2010 . the fictional law enforcemnt organisation operated for 10 years re branding council property and using the Council staff under Neil Wells control as AWINZ officers .
Neil wells still consults for government and makes submissions strange that he does not refer to the 10 years where he was the only person involved with AWINZ
this is how what I considered to be a fraud worked
I have brought it to the attention of the prime minister , Transparency International NZ , Auckland Council and again here , here , here, again here , here, here , here ,Auckland Mayor, the CEO of council , council lawyers and again here and here , here, here.
Maf and now the ministry of primary Industries repeatedly fobbed me off and actively concealed the fraud, after all they never checked to see if the trust existed before supporting the application for law enforcement status , I was later to find that the current lawyer for Maf was involved int he process earlier on when he was working for crown law so I guess his own work came under scrutiny therefore concealment of the fraud was an act of self defence complaints to Maf Here , here, here , here, here,here, here, here and here
attorney general here
notable blogs of the past touching on the corruption which exist in New Zealand
Conclusion : Fraudulent trusts are condoned in New Zealand , I was silenced because I was exposing how slack our trust administration was .
more to come Court is used to silence exposure of abuse of overseas trusts
The reason that our company and trust structure is so well liked is because THERE IS NO DUE DILIGENCE DONE BY THE REGISTRARS OF NEW ZEALAND COMPANIES AND TRUSTS ARE NOT RECORDED.
Few realize that our trust and company structure is actually most abused through lawyers who in turn are protected by our courts .
I am a whistle blower on the corrupt use of trusts , I thought that in this country which at the time prided itself to be the least corrupt that I could say ” hey guess what the law enforcement agency The animal welfare institute of New Zealand does not exist at all ” what happened? lawyers got together sued me for a ridiculous sum tried to bankrupt me and tried to put my company out of business. they were protected by their own society and the judges who were once members of that very society.
I have come to realize that the biggest gang in town are the lawyers. Its like complaining about a gang member and then being told to speak to the gang leaders if you feel there is a problem . If it is some one they want to dispose of it will be useful to them but if the person is in the ” in crowd ” and their activities make the gang look bad then there is a huge cover up. I have even had instances where he judges have gone way out on a limb to silence the entire matter one of those instances was with regards to a well published Russian lawyer who was up to his neck in trust companies such as those refereed to in the panama papers.
Just recently I assisted a young man who had had all of his shares fraudulently transferred from him and into the name of his business partner the minority share holder .Effectively he had his business stolen from him . We managed to get a lawyer appointed for the company who was taking instructions from the very person who was involved in the theft of the shares. I told the lawyer for the company that he had a duty to be independent ie act for the company and to act according to the rules and could not condone the illegal activities of the company. The result :-the lawyer made false complaint alleging that I was in contempt of court and had committed blackmail when I wrote to him and pointed out this section of the law I was promptly taken to court for harassment In Wellington when I lived in Auckland . The date of the hearing was conveniently left off the papers I was served and the evidence is such that I am convinced that the court, the registrars and the lawyers all conspire together to ensure that lawyers make a healthy living and no one dares question their activities.
As a result I now have a legal bill.. yes their fees of over $6,000 . I have a solution I will be selling an e book exposing their tactics of winning and every cent that I raise will go settling this ” debt” if there is interest I will simply sell more copies . I suspect that with the publication of the panama papers this e book could be quite popular as the companies legislation abuse and the manner in which some law firms condone unlawful transactions is central to makign the company structure in NZ a mockery
New Zealand is far more corrupt than you can imagine.
any one wishing to receive a copy of the e book can pre order shortly