Update on Samuel North , Malcolm North and Debbie North

On 11 April the following headline appeared

Muse on Allen director being chased by liquidators over payments

its probably worth our while to have a closer look at this news item  and  see what we  can confirm and  what we cannot .. no refection on the press but rather the persons they spoke to

“Muse on Allen closed in February 2016, with owner Samuel North reopening Muse Eatery and Bar on the corner of Chews Ln and Victoria St, formerly home to 3C Bar and Restaurant.

this is confirmed from what was Muse on Allen”s  Instagram account  now  called muse eatery and bar







The Instagram accounts are one and the same simply having gone through a name change as has face book


In September, North said his current business — Muse Eatery & Bar — was not connected to the liquidated business. It was owned by Catering Limited, of which he is the sole director.

see our post

Muse Eatery & Bar – a Phoenix rising ?

we had our suspicions  back  when the company was first created ,then  the information we have collated only goes to prove that  Muse on Allen and Muse eatery and bar  are one and the same  right down to the glassware .

you just need to do a google the picture  which comes up  puts muse on Allen  at 56 Victoria street  click on the reviews  and you will see that the reviews are  for Muse eatery 










Muse on Allen  was sold  for some $5o,000 claims  are made that “Muse on Allen”  was insolvent from day one  it appears to me that   if it was  bought for  $100,000  and sold for $50,000  then why would you   buy a  bigger and better place if your first venture was such  a  staggering  disaster .

but then   there  are always the perks    take  this  recent transaction on  Trade me for  instance

Paco Jet for sale

  • Start price: $4,500.00
  • No reserve No reserve
  • Closed: Fri 10 Mar 2017, 3:23 pm

Listing #: 1273954444



This appears to be  the one and the same as the  Paco jet whose arrival was celebrated on 27 November 2014

as seen on this link  ( picture below


It appears to me that    this Paco jet  belongs to Muse on Allen   and is being sold  By catering limited  what is even more intriguing is that the   trade me add gives the email address of info@muserestaurant.co.nz and has  an invitation to come to  Muse eatery  to come and view.

this sale closed on Fri 10 Mar 2017

the  profile for museeaterybar states that  this is  a person called Matteo   I rather suspect its Samuel operating  in an employees name  the same employee who worked for him in Allen street . Hope the liquidators ask questions about this one  it was being sold for about half price    and what is Samuel doing selling Muse on Allen chattels  worst of all if it is Matteo  the chef  what is he doing selling off   company stuff / Questions need to be asked

other items being sold   are Mon 21 Mar 2016  Chub safe

14 may 2016 11 Bar/Keg Beer Taps (Monteiths and more.)

1 june 2016 Skope 2 Door Freezer

The action against North — the sole director of the former Allen St business

It is true to say that Samuel was the sole director of the business in the end, both his parents  had been directors  and   directorship games  were played and are being played.

For example the new company  was formed by Samuel  3 December 2015  he was the sole share holder.

On 22 April 2016  he got his solicitor Hoggard Law Limited to put shares  into a trust .HANIA TRUSTEE (CATERING) LIMITED

On the 28th  Feb 2017  Malcolm becomes director , he know that he was going to court the following  week on a bankruptcy claim  and as expected he was declared Bankrupt  He again resigned 4 April  2017  and Samuel who had resigned 2 march 2017   became  a director again on  13 march  .

Estate Details
Insolvency Type   Adjudicated bankrupt on creditor’s application
Estate Number   882658
Name   NORTH, Malcolm Leslie
Month & Year of Birth   June 1952
Address at Adjudication   27 Bathgate Street, Johnsonville, Wellington, New Zealand
Insolvency Status   Current Bankrupt
Adjudication Date/Time   07-Mar-2017 10:34
Court   Wellington High Court
Occupation at Adjudication   Employment Support Representative Ministry of Social Development 
Employment Status   Currently employed
Multiple Insolvencies   No
Office for Enquiries   Wellington
Case Officer   MACPHERSON, Simon
Email Officer

I have to wonder if this resignation game had anything to do with the sale of   assets  of muse on Allen

there is one thing for certain these guys are playing games

North told the liquidators the business failed as a result of management conflict with business partners, an expensive lease and cashflow issues, the report said.

It would appear that the land lord is one of the persons owed money   see the liquidators reports

here and here     so how can an expensive lease be an issue  if you did not pay the land lord

and how could  cash flow issues    exist when the  restaurant was so successful that    Samuel was going to open a second one soon as reported  here .  February 6 2016.

In an interview  in concrete play ground in 2015  he also spoke of a  new restaurant ” And then perhaps another restaurant somewhere down the track. That’s a definite possibility.”

Well Samuel  one has gone belly up   so how did you manage to get the $$$  to set up the second ?

I very much suspect that there is not an honest way to achieve this  and you are so right “My parents gave me really good support, they’ve supported me the whole way through it. Especially my dad, he’s been in business before and really wanted me to do this I think.”   without your parents  who helped you  rip off  a  major share holder  and kick him out of the company  you could not have done it .

time will tell  I think we are getting the  the bit where it gets interesting.

I note Samuel  liked this link  dated 13 April  



Does that mean that  realizes that the writing is on the well  , I wonder

stay tuned.

Was Neil Wells censured ? is this why this animal welfare lawyer has gone?

While researching    a lawyer I had cause to look at the list of lawyers who have been censured, struck off or dealt with  by the law society

I came across one item “Name suppression granted to censured lawyer”  everything about it screams  Neil Wells to me 

looking at the detail in this matter and snip bits  that I have  picked up over the years.

I have known all along that  Neil Wells  was counting on a hefty chunk of the estate of one Laura Parrott  of Titirangi , the lady had  no family and supported animal welfare.

Even in the early days  she  was  involved with the various animal welfare projects in Waitakere city .

she wrote this letter in 1996 and there was a response from Tom Didovich . this was just after wells had published his plans for his own business plan  as set out in the territorial animal welfare services  document he  produced.

the letter indicated that  that she had been told something and was checking it out for herself.

Neil Wells was also in the process of writng the No 1 bill for the animal welfare act  , and into the bill he   inserted    the ability for  other organisations other than the RNZSPCA to become  law enforcement powers under the new legislation .

Wells became ” independent” adviser to the select committee and as soon as the  bill became law he made an application   under a false name .

He told the minister lies  and  misled Maf    with regards to the structure and nature of  the Animal welfare institute of New Zealand.  he operated it from the council premises and rebranded the council buildings  so that they looked as thought  they were  a private organisation.

In 2006 when I asked  questions  with regards to the lack of existence of AWINZ (  animal welfare institute of New Zealand ) Wells concocted a trust deed for a similarly named trust   he stuffed up on the dates  and formed the trust   for a date three months into the future of when the application was made . according to these affidavits  the trustees never met  and as a result two trust deeds materialized  this one  and this one   you will note that the  center pages of the second one are different .

So Laura Parrot was no the only one to be deceived , but she smelt a rat years later when Wells moved to Te Kuiti and  was telling people at the local SPCA that he was getting her money.

Wells at the time was  the chairman of Te Kuiti RNZSPCA   and  set in motion the charities demise .

In 2016 Wells did not renew his  practicing certificate

I very much suspect that the item  above relates to him.  this fine upstanding  citizen  who  lied to the minister  is still being protected .  he was held up  as being a person with an impecible   nature and I am the tart who defamed him.

But How do you defend defamation when the statutory defence of truth and honest opinion  are denied  by the court.

Hardly a fair  go is it.  Andrew little would have lost too if he  could not have had a jury  or a defence. You denied me  the defence of truth and honest opinion, broke my marriage up  and you call yourself a christian.

Neil   when are you going to  admit your sins    You will be judged.

Its not how we are judged in this world its  how we are judged in the next..    my conscience is clear  how is yours Neil ?

New Zealand: why it is a fabulous tax haven .. corruption.. what corruption ?

I was rather surprised to see transparency International   report that NZ was again at  the top of the least corrupt  tables, but I guess it all depend on who you ask and   what angle you are looking  from  a bit like the fascinating art work shown along side  you take a pile of garbage  and  you  stack it just right so that  all that is seen is the projection, the illusion   of peace and tranquility .

Today I had  an article forwarded to me,   it is a must share New Zealand the little tax haven that could   it makes reference to  another recent article

Trust Us – New Zealand Can Hide Your Money!

Of course I have been on to this since  2006  , I even wrote about it in my  submissions to parliament  when I petitioned for a commission against corruption  My  report  Was  disposed of by Mike Sabin  before he himself left parliament under a cloud .  this is my full report Evidence in support of the Petition of Grace Haden and others 5 11

my web sites are full of open letters  and  OIAs to government  and to ministers.  all of whom appear to  ignore the issue of corruption.    If you cannot see  or identify  corruption then I guess  we don’t have any.

It actually goes further than that I have been actively taken to court  and sued to conceal corruption, this has occurred more than once  .

  1.  Lynn Prior and  Terry Hay  This pair invented a liquidator and  director  . they took me to court for harassment because I went to the registered address of the fake  director  in an attempt to  find him.. how inconvenient . the news items are here Charges over alleged fake liquidator and Boss invents accountant to escape $60k debt. Honolulu   Business man Terry Hay, was charged with  22 counts of fraud   he  skipped the country and  returned  years later and got his QC   Mr Robert Bruce Stewart QC  to  pay off the crown law office  see FYI.org  to drop the charges . This is after his  lesser co offender  entered a plea of guilty and was  convicted.
  2. next I worked with a lawyer  whose name must not  be mentioned.  he was stuck off  then returned to the roll and allowed to withdraw himself from it , presumably so that he  can  work  in the trust area  in panama  where I believe he now resides.   I was on to the panama papers thing    I published several blogs  and I was sued  and told to take them down.
  3. this same lawyer  who the courts considered incompetent  , defended me in the matter of  AWINZ  which has to be the  most graphic example of    the  fiction that is trusts. see New Zealand , how we facilitate sham trusts.
  4. then the   Muse on allen   matter   showing the simplicity of  Phoenix companies  and running off with some ones  shareholding.. no paper work required Muse Eatery & Bar – a Phoenix rising ?

What is the most concerning thing of all is the lengths that lawyers , DIA, Police ,  govt departments  etc   go to to protect  and facilitate the   corrupt trust industry .  The problem is  right at the top.  we  get what we condone.

What I have seen happen with trusts and companies  should not happen.  There appears to be no accountability to  the law  and  matters are routinely taken to court   so as to involve parties in  protracted civil legal  action   there by preventing   investigation and bankrupting the  victims and preventing  the offenders from being held accountable.   Trust and company law appears to be  a farce.

Ordinary people grasp what is happening  so why do politicians, govt  departments  Police etc  not see it  ?  lets pretend  that its not happening  lets condone bad behavior but could some one please tell me  what is acceptable by  whom  .

see also   http://tvnz.co.nz/fair-go/new-zealand-great-place-shady-business-video-5650808  

Scam alert false IRD tax refund notifications

Over the holidays I received a notification  purporting to come from IRD stating that I  was due a refund

this was the email


the email address secureserver.net.nz is registered as shown here to Sigi Kirchmair  9 Leach Place  sigi@cactus.net.nz

the link was  to a British web site andytrevakis.com  andy@atreum.co.uk   the chances are that  these persons are either involved or have insecure servers

If you receive such an email  do not  click on the link or respond these are scams

the biggest  clue  that it is a scam is that IRD were  giving money away   telling you the exact amount your getting but not knowing your name…


If you receive such an email  send it on to  phishing@ird.govt.nz 

Vivienne Holm seeks a new practicing certificate

vivienne-holmYesterday I was approached by Net safe , who on behalf of Vivienne Holm sought changes to  former  blog posts  because Vivienne after holding a practicing certificate for  the past 10 years suddenly cant get one because of  something that was written   many years ago . Vivienne   is seeking  changes to the blog.   We are happy to make corrections  but  there is nothing to correct .   we are interested however in  addressing   injustices  and  if she feels that the comment   is an injustice then she can assit in correcting a far greater injustice  before we  look at the perception she has of tiny little one .

Summary  of Blogs which mention Vivienne

About AWINZ – Animal welfare institute of New Zealand  see also my affidavit

Intimidation by Vivienne HOLM ( Vivienne Parre ) ( Vivienne Wright )

Talking Works Tom Didovich!

How could A non existent private law enforcement authority survive for so long? Why condone corruption in Waitakere City?

Open letter to Wyn Hoadley councillor TCDC

Did David Neutze check the facts before he acted?

Is Wyn Hoadley fit to be a Lawyer, A trustee or a councillor?

How to get your litigation funded through the public purse

More submissions

The following is my response to Net safe  ,  The fact that Vivienne  and Malcolm North who has been  harassing me,   both worked at the ministry of social development   is a fact that is not  lost on me .

….Thank you net safe 

The animal welfare Institute of New Zealand (AWINZ )  had law enforcement powers  which it obtained after  an application was made   to the then  minister  of agriculture on 22 November 1999 .

A blank trust deed  had been attached to the application made by Neil Edward wells a barrister .

In reality ,No trust existed  and  no entity existed but the government  gave  AWINZ wide sweeping law enforcement powers akin to those held by the RNZSPCA, which includes search and seizure and ability to  fine people .

Neil Wells who applied on behalf of AWINZ had written the   no 1 bill for the  new Animal welfare act  and had inserted the  sections to  facilitate the application he subsequently made   and  he  also advised on  the act  as “independent advisor” to the select committee without declaring his obvious conflict of interest of writing an act  to facilitate his own business plan

In March 2006  an  employee  of Waitakere city council   Lynne McDonald ( the bird lady ) approached me with the concern that she, a dog control officer,  was required to  “ volunteer “ her council paid time to AWINZ and prioritise animal welfare over   dog control . The building at  the council  had been   rebranded   and  Neil wells her council manager from 2005  was the only person operating AWINZ   for which he used a logo which was  identical to the new branding of the council building .

Maf at the time of an audit acknowledged that the two   entities appeared to  merge and it was difficult to see where  one   began and the other finished.  The council on the other  hand denied that AWINZ operated from their premises . This  was  in reality a massive public fraud  using   public office for private pecuniary gain.

To prove that AWINZ  did not exist  several of us incorporated the name Animal Welfare institute of New Zealand  .It is impossible to incorporate the  identical name of  an entity, we were successful  there by conclusively proving that  AWINZ  the law enforcement authority did not exist .

Vivienne Holm @ Vivienne Parr @ Vivienne Wright   Phoned me late at night and made threats  against my Private investigators licence  and there by my income and livelihood.  She demanded that we had to give up the name AWINZ  when intimidation did not work Her then husband  Nick wright then   took over the matter  as Vivienne at the time  was working as a law clerk .

I called at her address to discuss a resolution and was promptly served with a trespass notice.

Now it has always puzzled me   why a Law clerk was instructed , surely that is not usual  and  why was her   first port of call  be an intimidating phone call late on a Friday night .. I thought that  a legitmaley instructed   person would use more transparent means  rather than acting like a thug.

After her husband  , a resource management lawyer  , became involved Threats of legal action were made  and out of the blue a trust deed materialised.

I was to find that the trust deed  dated 1.3.2000   had been signed when the  then dog control manager at Waitakere city council, Tom Didovich  visited the   various people who thought they were trustees.

However  they never met  never passed a resolution and certainly were not involved in the application  for the  “ approved organisation’  under section 121 of the animal welfare act  ( which Neil wells had had such a massive part in ), the trust they  were allegedly involved in held no assets  and  after  three years the trustees who  still had not met  were not reappointed, hence this was a totally sham trust

Nick Wright took me to court for defamation ,  for saying that AWINZ was a sham trust, which it was  and has proved to be . The defamation was allegedly of Neil Wells  , I was denied the right  to a  statutory defence of truth and honest opinion and no finding has ever been made that I defamed Neil wells  but I had to pay  some $100,000 to him and his  lawyer  all   for  being a whistle-blower on serious corruption .

This  went on for  some 10 years  the object was to bankrupt me . Neil wells in an email to MAF in 2007    said that this was his objective , he certainly tried hard enough

Nick wright  who is reputedly the “Auckland lawyer who had “fallen on hard times”( http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/77079681/auckland-lawyer-awarded-14000-from-police-over-false-arrest-imprisonment) has  ceased practicing   and Brookfields continued  their attack on me, I can only guess that if they had done the decent thing they  would have seen some notable  lawyers  struck off  for not checking the facts  before  filing matters in court and using their office contrary to the provisions of the Lawyers and conveyancers rules .

In the process of suing me they used dirty  tactics because  facts and evidence would not have won it for them . I have reason to believe that that  also worked  covertly on my marriage and ensured that  my 23 years marriage and my family was destroyed.   The lawyer who represented me was later found to be incompetent  and I  very much suspect he was working for the other side . So I lost ,  no way of winning when you have  a lawyer who the law society acknowledged as being incompetent and for whom judges had no respect .

All in all this created a massive miscarriage of justice   and one which I physically paid out well  over $300,000  for and   find it impossible to quantify the lost   hours of work, health    stress etc.

Brookfields, on  behalf of whom Vivienne Wright at the time,(previously Vivienne  Parr   now Vivienne Holm)  , took instructions from the fictional AWINZ  tried to liquidate my company and succeeded    until I found out that they  had  filed a false affidavit of service  and the whole thing was reversed.

So now 10 years  down the track and after having held  many  practicing certificates Vivienne  wants a different type of practicing certificate   because she is going to work  for Paul Cavanagh  who   retired exactly a year ago  .

Vivienne “ believes “   that she   already had her application in .  I am sure that she did not.( this is based on my concurrent records  )

I believe that  my post is   totally accurate  and that the fact  of   the date of her application for a  practicing certificate is   just a teensy weensy  bit  trivial compared to the  years of suffering which I and my family  have had to endure.

The good news is that I am happy to  work with  any one  who helps put things right . When the AWINZ matter has been addressed  and is history I can take down all the posts  but while the injustice   exists it requires exposure  of the fact  and   the facts will remain in the public realm

I cannot understand why she claims that  she   cannot get a practicing certificate on this occasion   , the  email you sent is dated 19 September 2016    and states that she  has held a practicing certificate  from April 2015 to the present .

Practicing certificates  renew at the end of June ,  The law society have just informed me that she does not currently hold a  practicing certificate, her last one expired 25 November  2016, it appears that that is the date when she left the MSD

My internet search reveals that  Paul Cavanagh QC  retired a year ago .

It would appear that Vivienne Holm  now wants to work in public practice again , as such she will  become an officer of the high court   and according to section 4 of the  Lawyers and conveyancers act will  have an  obligation to uphold the rule of law and to facilitate the administration of justice in New Zealand:

She may  wish to  help address the  AWINZ injustice ,  once that  has been sorted I can look at removing / altering  blogs .

I do find it amusing perhaps coincidental perhaps not , that  she was  employed by MSD   until 25 November where Malcolm North  who has been harassing me, by email   also works.

But getting back to Vivienne    I am happy to   remove  anything minor when  a greater injustice has been resolved, she only needs to contact me  and help me    right the wrongs  of the past  that she was instrumental in in  kicking off .      A person with integrity   would  see  that an as officer of the court  Vivienne  would  have an overriding obligation  to  justice  and if she cannot how integrity in   putting the past right  then she should not be asking me  to change factual information .

In the interest of transparency  I will be publishing this on Transparency.net.nz

Now this does take the cake

john-and-iOn Sunday I became the last person  to receive an autographed christmas cake from John Key while he was PM .

I was at the National party Christmas function in Palmerston North  .

Never thought that the PM  would resign after wee chat with me .



Suzie Dawson a blast from the past may she fare well in Russia

5-beecheIts a funny little world    and sometimes events which are long forgotten come back   and the planets align.

In august this year  my PI licence was up for renewal , I appeared  before the  ” authority ”  on a matter which should never have been accepted as a complaint let alone be investigated and  go as far as a  hearing.

Malcolm North had made a complaint under the code of conduct of Private investigators.  He did not like the fact that I was assisting, the person who I  believe is  victim of his crimes, in limiting damages .

There was   but one problem  there is  only one code of  conduct and that is with regards to  surveillance.

I was under investigations  by the DIA for  some 10 months   they  kept telling me that I was under investigation for breach of code of conduct.   and in the end they published a most defamatory report  which their spin doctors have defended  to the hilt to justify their investigations .

I was called before the PSPLA   and the ” authority ”  did  he only thing he could  do   and  dismissed the  complaint


While I was before this hearing, which actually did not have a valid complaint to hear , the Authority  Roger Gill   asked to speak to me off the record .  he did  so  and I recorded our conversation  for future reference .

I was told by him that  he did not consider me to be an appropriate person to hold a licence , I was told that I had to stop blogging and stop making complaints to the law society about lawyers or else I would not have a certificate of approval ( COE). I wrote to him and advised him of my rights under the bill of right  both to the freedom of expression and freedom to form and hold opinions.

My COE  was supposed to  renew on the 16th  August.  On the 12th  august  I received a  registered mail item, it was  an on the papers decision on my application.  It had been declined.

There were a number of  historic items listed   mainly  hearsay and   unsupported by real evidence  , others were items which  I should have had a right  of explanation  on. One was


ThI must admit this one had me thinking

There was never a  Restraining order  but I  did  get a trespass  notice after I had served papers   at 5 Beech place   a notice to   remove defamatory material from  a web site .

until this week it never clicked   and then   I saw  a most interesting  item on face book  a link which led to  this



WELL  is this   ever an exercise in self promotion / sensationalism , I was most interested to read the words on her scoop post 

The targeting of Ms Dawson led to serious threats against and endangerment of her life and those of her children.

suddenly I connected the two     and indeed in early 2013  I had had dealings  with one and the same Ms Dawson  when  she published defamatory and  blatantly incorrect  material about  me  and I simply asked her to remove it from her blogand when I was ignored served a notice  on her as required by the act.

I had phoned her  as first point of contact  and  her daughter had answered the phone  , I asked for Suzie Dawson and  when she got on the phone   she hurled a  barrage of abuse at me and a claim  that  I  was stalking her .

Eventually she did remove the material from her post    but it wold appear  that  she also made a false complaint that I was stalking her.

Knowing what I know  about Suzie Dawson   and having interacted with her , I do hope that she gets asylum in Russia  and may her  stay be a lengthy one.

I personally  would not  believe a thing she says  as to me ,on the evidence I have , I can conclude that  she  is  prone to  gross exaggeration and  paranoia .

She calls herself a journalist  but she is not one  .

If she is one of the 88 new Zealanders the government is looking at then the government is wasting tax payers  funds  ,  it is my opinion that she  does nothing more than regurgitates  information which she finds on the  web and publishes as her own .

Please don’t give her money  , in doing so you will be  supporting a potential fraud.  her web sites are https://twitter.com/HelpSuzi3D  , https://twitter.com/Suzi3D, contraspin.co.nz,www.  endarken.co.nz, http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sp9co7,   suziedawson.co.nz,   spinbin.co.nz,   occupysavvy.wordpress.com ,   https://vimeo.com/181517859,  https://winstonclose.me/2016/06/19/the-oppression-of-the-internet-is-global-by-suzie-dawson/,  https://twitter.com/    redstar309z,    

whil suzie Dawson claims to have done much she has infact done little.  evidence of  her blog is here   sh sertainly would not be on the most wanted list  and if she has suffered anything it wouldin my opinion be paranoia .

a clue to what she is up to is here 

Since joining the Occupy Auckland media team in 2011, Suzie Dawson has been a driving force behind many social justice and political movement media campaigns and events, including #GCSB, #NZ4Gaza and #TPPANoWay. Her work has been shared internationally including by RT.com, Wikileaks and Business Insider. She is currently traveling the world and writing about her experiences.

The reality is that Occupy Auckland is done and dusted.. Suzie is a self appointed journalist  and is funding  her overseas  travels by blogging and turning herself into  an international person of interest. It would appear that she has sold her Beeche place    home. The fact that she sold then   traveled the  globe gives more clarity to the statement

Kiwi journalist and activist Suzie Dawson has been extensively targeted by Western intelligence agencies and their contractors. In the wake of several overt attempts on her life, she had to leave her home in New Zealand to live in exile in Europe

Now Suzie  which is it  did you sell up and  go on a trip  or  were you forced to leave .. at least  you should be consistent in what you post  .. hope you are enjoying your cool million  please dont ask people to fund your holiday  its not ethical 5-beeche-price



Abuse of Harassment action ..attack the best form of defence for would be crims

lauda-finemToday was supposed to be a day in the garden but this morning a friend sent me a link to lauda Finem

I have  had to have  a giggle over the article  as it parallels what is going on in my life .. believe me though it is no  laughing matter   its probably more of a Yeh   Im not the only one on to it  giggle

in 2006 I discovered that  the animal welfare institute of New Zealand ( awinz).. an approved organisation   under the animal welfare act with  coercive search  and seizure powers..   did not exist.  I was taken to court for  defamation ..denied a defence of truth and honest opinion . they attacked my marriage  my family and spat me out the other end. All in the name of concealment of corruption

Next up were the directors  of fresh prepared , represented   by Peter Spring of Keegan Alexander   .. these news  items    speak volumes Boss invents accountant to escape $60k debt and Charges over alleged fake liquidator    Yes I had discovered the  lack of existence of the  director  l and the  liquidator.. this made me a threat to society   and  was taken to court for  harassment , I had not done anything  but they came up with things like   ..last night the bosses truck was broken into  we thought it was her , then we found  it wasn’t.

I took on a human rights lawyer  .He stripped me of serious cash   then took  me to court for harassment  because of what I knew . , I had not even breathed  a word but he feared  what he thought I knew  .. yes  the equivalent of the panama papers  but three years earlier  . It is no surprise that  now has a Panamanian address and is no longer a lawyer in NZ .

The court has sorted that one out  with its invisibility cloak .. I am not allowed to use his name and     looking back I am  not sure who he was  working for it certainly was not  for me

Next  Neil Wells  the man behind AWINZ  succeeded in getting my  company liquidated, he did this by using   translegal  to  not served papers on me , so I was blissfully unaware of the action until it was too late.  I caught the document server out  and the liquidation was reversed. A lady contacted me  and they were trying to take one of her children away from  her they were the   the  parents of the sperm donor ( now deceased ) they decided that they wanted the  child   so the  proceedings were commenced  using a trans legal  document server , who had 30 previous convictions for dishonesty  and is still in the business.   She did not get an apology  I did  at the direction of hte court  they were supposed to put it on their web page   but    took it down  in a flash   here is the translegal-apology

The next to sue me for harassment  was another lawyer   one who was  representing Muse on Allen.. of the law firm Johnston Lawrence Limited  , I made the fatal mistake of  telling him that he should  act according to the rule of law and not  support criminal action  .  The directors of muse on Allen   Malcolm North , Debbie north and Samuel North ,  had transferred shares representing  a young mans total investment in a company  into the name of Samuel north   they called this an  “error ” I pointed out that after  three years ” errors” can no longer be called ” errors “if they are acknowledged and not  corrected. .. that  worth taking harassment action over.. guess it prevents a claim of using your office to facilitate fraud.   the lawyer had himself removed from the court action in a  confidential  application to the court  .

The strategy which was played out  was very  clever  and  by introducing  un substantiated  allegations of defamation at the 11th hour, filed    and bypassing me for  any comment . Playing this game  they got a restraining order when I missed the court date as they had conveniently not served that document  on me   and had  at the last minute lulled me into believing that  an undertaking would  suffice .

When I had the judgement  recalled , the  directors of the law firm Johnston Lawrence Limited   went out of their way to misdirect the court . fortunately the law society are looking into their action .  Defamtion  has a statute of its own  and  defamation has to be pleaded , it cant be alleged.   there is a defence of truth  and honest opinion for defamation , but when you are denied that right of  defence  it leaves you sadly lacking  and  fiction becomes fact  e.g.  a non existent animal welfare institute of New Zealand becomes  the emperors new clothes.

The next one  who has been threatening defamation action is the man who does not know how to stop harassing ;-Malcolm North   who is up to his neck in what  I have proved to be  is   dubious company activity  ( truth )  having    defrauded a young man from  some $64,000  so that his own  son can claim to be the youngest top chef and set up a restaurant without any funds  except those   he ” acquired ” through   the unlawful stroke of a pen .

Malcolm North  is particularly keen that I tell the world that   My  Private investigators certificate was not renewed.   Well  why should I when  this has been over turned on appeal , he is now  seeking advice from the PSPLA  on how to object once again , he is beavering  away in the back ground  spying on me   and  looking at  all possible ways  to discredit me and   cost me income .

This is where today’s   item was very timely  not only does it mention  the use of the court by the corrupt  but it shows the failings of a PI registration  system .

I am, apparently, in the opinion of the ” authority ”  not a suitable person to be a PI  because the ” authority’  did not like me  blogging   or making complaints about lawyers .. I have  the voice recording for any one who wants to confirm this … he ( Roger Gill )  told me in an unofficial meeting  that unless I stop  blogging and making complaints about lawyers that  I  would not get a   certificate  of approval .  I felt that that was a tad blackmailish  and have a firm belief in the right  to hold an opinion and for the  freedom of expression .

So it came as a bit of a surprise to see that Danny Thompson has got his approval through  despite  not having declared previous convictions , I am also aware of others with convictions  who  hold  PI  Licences of COE’s including Gary Swan  who was exonerated   for   facilitating false affidavits of service but because I speak up  against corruption I am a danger to society

the reasons  for declinature.. for which the authority dug   deep were

  1. the allegation that I was warned for blackmail by the police ..  this was not  the case and the  PSPLA actually  had no documents at all   to support this allegation.
  2. I had allegedly stalked  a   woman and her daughter, this was conveniently an anonymous complaint and even thought it allegedly occurred in 2012   was never investigated  it was enough to count against me .. I have a rough idea  who the  vindictive bitch was
  3. then   a matter  which the Pspla had already sat on and  dismissed was  reconsidered  and counted for 2  matters  the fact that the  woman involved,  one Parrisa Hamedi    was living in a housing corp house in Nelson while claiming to be in a defacto relationship  in Auckland   is beside  the point;-  the object of the exercise was to claim as many assets with as few possible bonks.  The lawyer involved Steven Zindel   took her claim to court   just when  the  victim was getting married  .There was no evidence of   defacto relationship , she was still living  with her children and  ex husband and collecting $$$$  from our government and used legal aid to  try and facilitate what I consider  to be a fraud. . Both Zindel and Parisa Hamedi took me to the Pspla  because I told him that  Zindel had an obligation to  ensure that   he did not use the court for an attempted fraud  and  I also provided evidence that there was no  defacto relationship .  I came to  this conclusion four years before the court came to the same conclusion but on the plus side many  lawyers including Zindel  made a few bob on the way  all courtesy of the  tax payer .
  4.  then last but not least   the Johnson Lawrence matter was hurled in my face.

I have to add that on each of the above allegations I was not given a chance to  comment   and it was a  Fait Accompli as far as the authority was concerned

In the appeal papers the PSPLA  had included yet another matter   one of  Dr Gerald Waters  who had complained about my action  You can read all about him here   yes another crim using the court to fight back

So what it all comes down to  is that the court is being used as a weapon of choice to conceal  fraud corruption and crime , it is a tool used by the corrupt ;Tar  the person who is most likely  to expose you  and you  could get away Scott free.

All I have ever wished for  is for half as much investigation to have gone into  AWINZ and Muse on Allen as has gone into me  for standing by the victims of crime .  This can only  lead me to believe that  our society   supports corruption

The private security licencing authority is of the opinion that I believe in some sort of conspiracy  ( his words not mine ) . The reality is  that when you  look for coruppion you find it very easily  because there is so much of it. the only way to  not see it is to walk about with your eyes closed or  be part of the problem

Well  when I read  Lauda Finem and this latest matter    I don’t have to think that there is some   sort of corruption lurking in the justice system;  I know there   is . I have spoken to  people whose  properties have been stolen from them  by  Lawyers who ensured that documents  conveniently went missing from  files . they are trusted  and believable  and  officers of the court .. they would not do that….or would they  ?????

Its like magic   if  you believe something has integrity then you  wont think it can happen… but   its all sleight of hand and concealment and integrity that isn’t actually there

Blogs take the magic away that is why we must be stopped. While ” they”  control the news  , they cant control us . yesterday I heard on the news that we must not believe  what is in blogs .. well I’m not certain  if  we should  actually believe the news either

No one will take away my right to blog  I do so pursuant to my rights under the bill of rights.  I   report the truth     which apparently is frowned upon.  I wonder why  ?

Malcolm North takes a break from Bankruptcy court to do more harassing

muse-owes-160000This week has been a big week  for Malcolm North  He appeared in the Wellington High court  bankruptcy court.  He has  apparently come home to have another go at me, I am becoming very tired of his  bullying behaviour   and  find the only way to deal with him  is through this site

I have responded in Red

From: malcolm north [mailto:malcolm@muserestaurant.co.nz]
Sent: Thursday, 10 November 2016 6:06 p.m.
To: ‘Grace’
Subject: Defamatory Information.

Hello Grace.

I have requested you before to remove the defamatory information from your website and so far you have not done this I don’t have a problem with factual information so can you either remove it or amend it.

Malcolm I have responded to you and  advised you that truth is never  defamatory. I responded  on 30 September , if you care to look at the act you will note that you are grossly out of  time   however  with respect  to the following I will address them 

  • I am not a Business Development Manager with Ministry of Social Development. Not true.

the words used  were ”   I believe”  I may have  got that wrong looking at your earlier emails which were sent  from your business email you  the following   so   perhaps you still hold that position 

 Malcolm North
Employment Broker
Job Connect.
Phone: 0800-778-008  DDI 049137535
Email: malcolm.north004@msd.govt.nz

  • Debbie had no input into setting up the business ( please provide evidence that she did )

Please refer to the companies  register  on the 17th August she   completed and  uploaded her own directors documents  back dating them to the date the company was formed  Director Consent 

apparently it is an offence under the companies act to do that   and also there are no resolutions which allow her to even be appointed as director  but then that  has never made any difference .

Even when she worked for the Dental council she allegedly managed to get a dentist removed from the roll without  following process . 

  • The matter has been before the courts for 4 years not 2 years. Not true.

sorry I erred on the side of caution .. how is that defamatory ? 

  • The Police have advised on 2 occasions  not 4 that we should refrain from emailing you .Not true

It would appear that  it doesn’t matter how many time you get told you keep on emailing.. this is harassment 

  • You are correct that Joszef contributed $65,000 towards setting up the business but you have failed to supply evidence where the balance of the purchase price and further capital came from .If you read the 2012 /2013 you will see a further $79,147 was introduced please provide evidence that this is not the case.

The 2013 and 2014 annual  accounts  show no  introduction of equity annual accounts  It shows  loans which is an introduction of debt  and  Samuel actually took out  more money in the business than he had invested. 

It appears to me that you do not grasp the concept of equity and loans 

  • Please provide evidence that we have defrauded Joszef because we have not seen any.

OK   I will explain this S L O W L Y    You and Debbie were directors of the company with Samuel Director Consent      Director Consent Form      Director Consent

You went home to your flat and without giving the proper notice had a cozy meeting  and  threw Jozsef out  Particulars of Director  the resolution you passed  is here directors-resolution-dated-10-january-2013  note that it is signed by Debbie  

Debbie and  Samuel  were directors when  Jozsefs majority share holding was reduced through no  legal means for the shares to be transferred from  Jozsef to samuel   when there was no paperwork or transactions to  facilitate that Shareholder Consent Form   transferred shares  here  to 49%   and then when you were director took all his shares Here . In my experience  and  my opinion it  is fraudulent   to claim shares which have not been legally transferred  and the person  owning them  has not received compensation  or  consented to the the transfer  .  

As directors of the company you had a legal obligation   to oversee the share register  and in my  humble opinion ,  by allowing this to continue  you became parties to the offence as well as committing offences under the companies  act 

You then   represented the company in court proceedings and passed yourself off as  a lawyer  and  claimed that the shares were transferred in ” error”  but despite this   and over the period of  four years  you never made any attempts to correct the alleged  ” error ” 

  • You are correct about the ownership of the BMW can you please provide evidence that this was paid for from Muse on Allen funds.

The ownership of the vehicle   shows that  it was owned by Muse on Allen , there was a security  interest agaisnt it  in the name of Muse on allen 

the vehicle was then transfered to  the ownership of Catering  Limited   and the PPSR remained with Muse on allen  but changed some months later   .

the registration of the BMW is now 1 Muse 1 

  • We have seen no evidence of bullying yourself and Joszef by myself and Samuel can you please provide this.

It is sad that you do not know what bullying is,   the  many horrible emails which you have sent   the personal comments the below the belt  statements   are privately recorded , only the police have copies of them , they were sufficient for them to warn you a number of times 

  • Your concerns to my employers have been thoroughly investigated and no action has been taken against me.

Time will tell  

  • Could you please provide evidence that Muse on Allen was run into the ground.

Where do I begin 

The company is in liquidation 

It owes $160,000  see here 

I could go on but it  would be boring 

I am receiving calls at my employment about your behaviour in the Hawkes Bay so contrary to what you might think the publicity you are giving me is probably not in your favour.

Now that would be boring    why would any one want to  call you   about me  ,   But I guess that would  be the same  way as people phoning me  about the three of you  

but don’t you  think that the statement you have just made is not bullying  ??????   I think it is  

Trusting this is not seen as bullying  as it is not intended to be as it is only a opportunity for you to amend your postings before I  go to the expense to proceed with defamation proceedings against you.

Yes I do see it as bullying , I wont be amending anything  I   think that this  explanation should serve  any discerning reader  . Long live transparency  

Kind regards

Malcolm North

Ministry of social development employee Malcolm North continues to Bully

I believe that Malcolm North is  a Business development manger  with the ministry of social development .

In 2012 he  and his  wife  Debbie  North  and son  Samuel North , used a young Hungarian chef   to  fund the setting up of the Muse on Allen restaurant.   Once they had his money they turned on him  and removed his as director and   transferred all his shares into  Samuel’s name .

The matter had been  before the court for  some 2 years when  the lawyers   advised that the company was insolvent  . by this stage Jozsef had spent $50,000   on top of the 64,000 which had  been stolen from him .

I prepared  complaints for the  police and for the registrar of companies   they can be found here  Offences  .  The evidence is available  on request  but due to the bulk of  the evidence I have not placed it on the web site .

Neither the police nor registrar of companies would act  because the matter is before the court , the fact that it is before the court  under section 174 of the companies act   appears to  be beside the point   and the many serious  imprison-able offences  are  on the back burner probably awaiting the statute of limitations to pass .

Because I appear to be the only person who has  focused on the  criminal aspect Malcolm has had it in for me.

I have reported his  actions and  those of his son to the police many times and I think they are up to warning  4 .

Just a few weeks ago  Malcolm sought to  cast aspersions on me  with a business group that I belong to  , I  responded by sending an open letter to his wife Debbie  whose actions facilitated this  whole mess  right at the beginning.

Now Malcolm   has threatened legal action   alleging defamation . It is therefore appropriate for me to respond in terms of  section  25 of the defamation act 

the following are the statements which Malcolm alleges to be defamatory .  Truth and honest opinion are never defamatory , truth may be inconvenient  but in the end we are all accountable to the truth

I have for each statement produced the evidence  which  I rely on

The only equity in the business was  the  funds which Jozsef introduced.  Truth  the  evidence is the 2014 accounts . as can be seen  by the end of 2014  the only equity in the company was Jozsef’s  funds , Samuel actually had a deficit .

shae holder accounts


In my professional opinion and based on the   evidence I have collated I am of the opinion that all three of you should be locked up for defrauding  Jozsef.

Honest opinion based on 15 years policing experience and  13 years as a private investigator    see the offences as  shown above 


Samuel is still driving the  BMW  which he purchased using   the money which  he made out of Muse on allen   and he has now transferred the ownership to  Catering limited.

Truth  I will supply the registration  documents and the  ppsr’s. they can be found  here  as  shown to Muse on Allen here BMW   and transferred to catering co  Here bmw-1muse1 note also the  number plate change but the chassis no etc are the same  good to see that a young man who has just put a company into liquidation can afford  a personalised plate the regos  are.muse-on-allen-ownership-bmwcatering-limited-ownership-bmw

The three of you have  defrauded  Jozsef  , you have   allowed Muse on Allen to be run into the ground and have left a trail of debts.

Honest opinion based on 15 years policing experience and  13 years as a private investigator     offences  and the  credit report of Muse . here muse-on-allen-credit-check  not the defaults and also the fact that  the company is now in liquidation   see here 

Throughout this time   and    to this date you have stood by and allowed your son and husband  to bully and abuse both Jozsef and myself.

Truth  the police have  warned him  at least three times you have apparently done nothing but duck for  cover 

I have communicated my concerns  about Malcolm’s behaviour to the ministry of social development    I do not believe that persons who practices this level of bullying that  in his private life ,  does not  display those same qualities at work .

Honest opinion  the degree of bullying which we have suffered is  unbelievable   there are many emails in which they have made the most  cruel remarks to me  , I am totally  fed up with their  bullying behaviour   

 Often what is not  objected to proves more  than you realise.  In this case Malcolm North  by not claiming  these statements to be defamatory   admits to them as fact   

1. I am writing to you in the hope that   we may be able to   sort out the bullying which I have been suffering at the hands of you husband and son.

2.Jozsef and Sam were the only  directors when the company was  formed. You were  to be an alternate director for Samuel   and  you completed your own forms and backdated your directorship  to day one .  If you were to ask any one at the companies office they would tell you that this is not a lawful  way to do things as you cannot appoint yourself director

3.With your son  You then appointed  Malcolm your husband to be a further director  then all three of you  went home and passed a resolution to remove Jozsef as director

4.As a director of the company  you allowed Samuel to  transfer all of Jozsefs shares into his own name   without any legal basis  and without the introduction of  further equity into the company .

5.Through out  this time   and    to this date you have stood by and allowed your son and husband  to bully and abuse both Jozsef and myself.

6. we have made complaints to the police  under the harmful digital communications act  and   despite the fact that they have been  warned a number of time the abuse has continued

7. Last Year Malcolm made a complaint against my private investigators licence ,   there was no  substance in his complaint

8. His vexatious complaints had me under investigation for some 10 months

Now he is sending emails   to  people associated   with my business

10 If the police did their job and were not busy   dealing with traffic  the three of you would   beheld fully answerable to the  law .

11.I realize that attack is  the best form of defence and that is exactly the only defence which  your son  and husband have

12.Debbie  how about   some integrity  you work for counselors  how about getting some counselign for your  boys   so that they can see  that what they are doing is  pure bullying  and totally un ethical.