Vivienne Holm seeks a new practicing certificate

vivienne-holmYesterday I was approached by Net safe , who on behalf of Vivienne Holm sought changes to  former  blog posts  because Vivienne after holding a practicing certificate for  the past 10 years suddenly cant get one because of  something that was written   many years ago . Vivienne   is seeking  changes to the blog.   We are happy to make corrections  but  there is nothing to correct .   we are interested however in  addressing   injustices  and  if she feels that the comment   is an injustice then she can assit in correcting a far greater injustice  before we  look at the perception she has of tiny little one .

Summary  of Blogs which mention Vivienne

About AWINZ – Animal welfare institute of New Zealand  see also my affidavit

Intimidation by Vivienne HOLM ( Vivienne Parre ) ( Vivienne Wright )

Talking Works Tom Didovich!

How could A non existent private law enforcement authority survive for so long? Why condone corruption in Waitakere City?

Open letter to Wyn Hoadley councillor TCDC

Did David Neutze check the facts before he acted?

Is Wyn Hoadley fit to be a Lawyer, A trustee or a councillor?

How to get your litigation funded through the public purse

More submissions

The following is my response to Net safe  ,  The fact that Vivienne  and Malcolm North who has been  harassing me,   both worked at the ministry of social development   is a fact that is not  lost on me .

….Thank you net safe 

The animal welfare Institute of New Zealand (AWINZ )  had law enforcement powers  which it obtained after  an application was made   to the then  minister  of agriculture on 22 November 1999 .

A blank trust deed  had been attached to the application made by Neil Edward wells a barrister .

In reality ,No trust existed  and  no entity existed but the government  gave  AWINZ wide sweeping law enforcement powers akin to those held by the RNZSPCA, which includes search and seizure and ability to  fine people .

Neil Wells who applied on behalf of AWINZ had written the   no 1 bill for the  new Animal welfare act  and had inserted the  sections to  facilitate the application he subsequently made   and  he  also advised on  the act  as “independent advisor” to the select committee without declaring his obvious conflict of interest of writing an act  to facilitate his own business plan

In March 2006  an  employee  of Waitakere city council   Lynne McDonald ( the bird lady ) approached me with the concern that she, a dog control officer,  was required to  “ volunteer “ her council paid time to AWINZ and prioritise animal welfare over   dog control . The building at  the council  had been   rebranded   and  Neil wells her council manager from 2005  was the only person operating AWINZ   for which he used a logo which was  identical to the new branding of the council building .

Maf at the time of an audit acknowledged that the two   entities appeared to  merge and it was difficult to see where  one   began and the other finished.  The council on the other  hand denied that AWINZ operated from their premises . This  was  in reality a massive public fraud  using   public office for private pecuniary gain.

To prove that AWINZ  did not exist  several of us incorporated the name Animal Welfare institute of New Zealand  .It is impossible to incorporate the  identical name of  an entity, we were successful  there by conclusively proving that  AWINZ  the law enforcement authority did not exist .

Vivienne Holm @ Vivienne Parr @ Vivienne Wright   Phoned me late at night and made threats  against my Private investigators licence  and there by my income and livelihood.  She demanded that we had to give up the name AWINZ  when intimidation did not work Her then husband  Nick wright then   took over the matter  as Vivienne at the time  was working as a law clerk .

I called at her address to discuss a resolution and was promptly served with a trespass notice.

Now it has always puzzled me   why a Law clerk was instructed , surely that is not usual  and  why was her   first port of call  be an intimidating phone call late on a Friday night .. I thought that  a legitmaley instructed   person would use more transparent means  rather than acting like a thug.

After her husband  , a resource management lawyer  , became involved Threats of legal action were made  and out of the blue a trust deed materialised.

I was to find that the trust deed  dated 1.3.2000   had been signed when the  then dog control manager at Waitakere city council, Tom Didovich  visited the   various people who thought they were trustees.

However  they never met  never passed a resolution and certainly were not involved in the application  for the  “ approved organisation’  under section 121 of the animal welfare act  ( which Neil wells had had such a massive part in ), the trust they  were allegedly involved in held no assets  and  after  three years the trustees who  still had not met  were not reappointed, hence this was a totally sham trust

Nick Wright took me to court for defamation ,  for saying that AWINZ was a sham trust, which it was  and has proved to be . The defamation was allegedly of Neil Wells  , I was denied the right  to a  statutory defence of truth and honest opinion and no finding has ever been made that I defamed Neil wells  but I had to pay  some $100,000 to him and his  lawyer  all   for  being a whistle-blower on serious corruption .

This  went on for  some 10 years  the object was to bankrupt me . Neil wells in an email to MAF in 2007    said that this was his objective , he certainly tried hard enough

Nick wright  who is reputedly the “Auckland lawyer who had “fallen on hard times”( http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/77079681/auckland-lawyer-awarded-14000-from-police-over-false-arrest-imprisonment) has  ceased practicing   and Brookfields continued  their attack on me, I can only guess that if they had done the decent thing they  would have seen some notable  lawyers  struck off  for not checking the facts  before  filing matters in court and using their office contrary to the provisions of the Lawyers and conveyancers rules .

In the process of suing me they used dirty  tactics because  facts and evidence would not have won it for them . I have reason to believe that that  also worked  covertly on my marriage and ensured that  my 23 years marriage and my family was destroyed.   The lawyer who represented me was later found to be incompetent  and I  very much suspect he was working for the other side . So I lost ,  no way of winning when you have  a lawyer who the law society acknowledged as being incompetent and for whom judges had no respect .

All in all this created a massive miscarriage of justice   and one which I physically paid out well  over $300,000  for and   find it impossible to quantify the lost   hours of work, health    stress etc.

Brookfields, on  behalf of whom Vivienne Wright at the time,(previously Vivienne  Parr   now Vivienne Holm)  , took instructions from the fictional AWINZ  tried to liquidate my company and succeeded    until I found out that they  had  filed a false affidavit of service  and the whole thing was reversed.

So now 10 years  down the track and after having held  many  practicing certificates Vivienne  wants a different type of practicing certificate   because she is going to work  for Paul Cavanagh  who   retired exactly a year ago  .

Vivienne “ believes “   that she   already had her application in .  I am sure that she did not.( this is based on my concurrent records  )

I believe that  my post is   totally accurate  and that the fact  of   the date of her application for a  practicing certificate is   just a teensy weensy  bit  trivial compared to the  years of suffering which I and my family  have had to endure.

The good news is that I am happy to  work with  any one  who helps put things right . When the AWINZ matter has been addressed  and is history I can take down all the posts  but while the injustice   exists it requires exposure  of the fact  and   the facts will remain in the public realm

I cannot understand why she claims that  she   cannot get a practicing certificate on this occasion   , the  email you sent is dated 19 September 2016    and states that she  has held a practicing certificate  from April 2015 to the present .

Practicing certificates  renew at the end of June ,  The law society have just informed me that she does not currently hold a  practicing certificate, her last one expired 25 November  2016, it appears that that is the date when she left the MSD

My internet search reveals that  Paul Cavanagh QC  retired a year ago .

It would appear that Vivienne Holm  now wants to work in public practice again , as such she will  become an officer of the high court   and according to section 4 of the  Lawyers and conveyancers act will  have an  obligation to uphold the rule of law and to facilitate the administration of justice in New Zealand:

She may  wish to  help address the  AWINZ injustice ,  once that  has been sorted I can look at removing / altering  blogs .

I do find it amusing perhaps coincidental perhaps not , that  she was  employed by MSD   until 25 November where Malcolm North  who has been harassing me, by email   also works.

But getting back to Vivienne    I am happy to   remove  anything minor when  a greater injustice has been resolved, she only needs to contact me  and help me    right the wrongs  of the past  that she was instrumental in in  kicking off .      A person with integrity   would  see  that an as officer of the court  Vivienne  would  have an overriding obligation  to  justice  and if she cannot how integrity in   putting the past right  then she should not be asking me  to change factual information .

In the interest of transparency  I will be publishing this on Transparency.net.nz

Now this does take the cake

john-and-iOn Sunday I became the last person  to receive an autographed christmas cake from John Key while he was PM .

I was at the National party Christmas function in Palmerston North  .

Never thought that the PM  would resign after wee chat with me .

 

cake

Suzie Dawson a blast from the past may she fare well in Russia

5-beecheIts a funny little world    and sometimes events which are long forgotten come back   and the planets align.

In august this year  my PI licence was up for renewal , I appeared  before the  ” authority ”  on a matter which should never have been accepted as a complaint let alone be investigated and  go as far as a  hearing.

Malcolm North had made a complaint under the code of conduct of Private investigators.  He did not like the fact that I was assisting, the person who I  believe is  victim of his crimes, in limiting damages .

There was   but one problem  there is  only one code of  conduct and that is with regards to  surveillance.

I was under investigations  by the DIA for  some 10 months   they  kept telling me that I was under investigation for breach of code of conduct.   and in the end they published a most defamatory report  which their spin doctors have defended  to the hilt to justify their investigations .

I was called before the PSPLA   and the ” authority ”  did  he only thing he could  do   and  dismissed the  complaint

north-complaint

While I was before this hearing, which actually did not have a valid complaint to hear , the Authority  Roger Gill   asked to speak to me off the record .  he did  so  and I recorded our conversation  for future reference .

I was told by him that  he did not consider me to be an appropriate person to hold a licence , I was told that I had to stop blogging and stop making complaints to the law society about lawyers or else I would not have a certificate of approval ( COE). I wrote to him and advised him of my rights under the bill of right  both to the freedom of expression and freedom to form and hold opinions.

My COE  was supposed to  renew on the 16th  August.  On the 12th  august  I received a  registered mail item, it was  an on the papers decision on my application.  It had been declined.

There were a number of  historic items listed   mainly  hearsay and   unsupported by real evidence  , others were items which  I should have had a right  of explanation  on. One was

dawson-vexatious-complaint

ThI must admit this one had me thinking

There was never a  Restraining order  but I  did  get a trespass  notice after I had served papers   at 5 Beech place   a notice to   remove defamatory material from  a web site .

until this week it never clicked   and then   I saw  a most interesting  item on face book  a link which led to  this

dawson-seeks-asylum

 

WELL  is this   ever an exercise in self promotion / sensationalism , I was most interested to read the words on her scoop post 

The targeting of Ms Dawson led to serious threats against and endangerment of her life and those of her children.

suddenly I connected the two     and indeed in early 2013  I had had dealings  with one and the same Ms Dawson  when  she published defamatory and  blatantly incorrect  material about  me  and I simply asked her to remove it from her blogand when I was ignored served a notice  on her as required by the act.

I had phoned her  as first point of contact  and  her daughter had answered the phone  , I asked for Suzie Dawson and  when she got on the phone   she hurled a  barrage of abuse at me and a claim  that  I  was stalking her .

Eventually she did remove the material from her post    but it wold appear  that  she also made a false complaint that I was stalking her.

Knowing what I know  about Suzie Dawson   and having interacted with her , I do hope that she gets asylum in Russia  and may her  stay be a lengthy one.

I personally  would not  believe a thing she says  as to me ,on the evidence I have , I can conclude that  she  is  prone to  gross exaggeration and  paranoia .

She calls herself a journalist  but she is not one  .

If she is one of the 88 new Zealanders the government is looking at then the government is wasting tax payers  funds  ,  it is my opinion that she  does nothing more than regurgitates  information which she finds on the  web and publishes as her own .

Please don’t give her money  , in doing so you will be  supporting a potential fraud.  her web sites are https://twitter.com/HelpSuzi3D  , https://twitter.com/Suzi3D, contraspin.co.nz,www.  endarken.co.nz, http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sp9co7,   suziedawson.co.nz,   spinbin.co.nz,   occupysavvy.wordpress.com ,   https://vimeo.com/181517859,  https://winstonclose.me/2016/06/19/the-oppression-of-the-internet-is-global-by-suzie-dawson/,  https://twitter.com/    redstar309z,    

a clue to what she is up to is here 

Since joining the Occupy Auckland media team in 2011, Suzie Dawson has been a driving force behind many social justice and political movement media campaigns and events, including #GCSB, #NZ4Gaza and #TPPANoWay. Her work has been shared internationally including by RT.com, Wikileaks and Business Insider. She is currently traveling the world and writing about her experiences.

The reality is that Occupy Auckland is done and dusted.. Suzie is a self appointed journalist  and is funding  her overseas  travels by blogging and turning herself into  an international person of interest. It would appear that she has sold her Beeche place    home. The fact that she sold then   traveled the  globe gives more clarity to the statement

Kiwi journalist and activist Suzie Dawson has been extensively targeted by Western intelligence agencies and their contractors. In the wake of several overt attempts on her life, she had to leave her home in New Zealand to live in exile in Europe

Now Suzie  which is it  did you sell up and  go on a trip  or  were you forced to leave .. at least  you should be consistent in what you post  .. hope you are enjoying your cool million  please dont ask people to fund your holiday  its not ethical 5-beeche-price

 

 

Abuse of Harassment action ..attack the best form of defence for would be crims

lauda-finemToday was supposed to be a day in the garden but this morning a friend sent me a link to lauda Finem

I have  had to have  a giggle over the article  as it parallels what is going on in my life .. believe me though it is no  laughing matter   its probably more of a Yeh   Im not the only one on to it  giggle

in 2006 I discovered that  the animal welfare institute of New Zealand ( awinz).. an approved organisation   under the animal welfare act with  coercive search  and seizure powers..   did not exist.  I was taken to court for  defamation ..denied a defence of truth and honest opinion . they attacked my marriage  my family and spat me out the other end. All in the name of concealment of corruption

Next up were the directors  of fresh prepared , represented   by Peter Spring of Keegan Alexander   .. these news  items    speak volumes Boss invents accountant to escape $60k debt and Charges over alleged fake liquidator    Yes I had discovered the  lack of existence of the  director  l and the  liquidator.. this made me a threat to society   and  was taken to court for  harassment , I had not done anything  but they came up with things like   ..last night the bosses truck was broken into  we thought it was her , then we found  it wasn’t.

I took on a human rights lawyer  .He stripped me of serious cash   then took  me to court for harassment  because of what I knew . , I had not even breathed  a word but he feared  what he thought I knew  .. yes  the equivalent of the panama papers  but three years earlier  . It is no surprise that  now has a Panamanian address and is no longer a lawyer in NZ .

The court has sorted that one out  with its invisibility cloak .. I am not allowed to use his name and     looking back I am  not sure who he was  working for it certainly was not  for me

Next  Neil Wells  the man behind AWINZ  succeeded in getting my  company liquidated, he did this by using   translegal  to  not served papers on me , so I was blissfully unaware of the action until it was too late.  I caught the document server out  and the liquidation was reversed. A lady contacted me  and they were trying to take one of her children away from  her they were the   the  parents of the sperm donor ( now deceased ) they decided that they wanted the  child   so the  proceedings were commenced  using a trans legal  document server , who had 30 previous convictions for dishonesty  and is still in the business.   She did not get an apology  I did  at the direction of hte court  they were supposed to put it on their web page   but    took it down  in a flash   here is the translegal-apology

The next to sue me for harassment  was another lawyer   one who was  representing Muse on Allen.. of the law firm Johnston Lawrence Limited  , I made the fatal mistake of  telling him that he should  act according to the rule of law and not  support criminal action  .  The directors of muse on Allen   Malcolm North , Debbie north and Samuel North ,  had transferred shares representing  a young mans total investment in a company  into the name of Samuel north   they called this an  “error ” I pointed out that after  three years ” errors” can no longer be called ” errors “if they are acknowledged and not  corrected. .. that  worth taking harassment action over.. guess it prevents a claim of using your office to facilitate fraud.   the lawyer had himself removed from the court action in a  confidential  application to the court  .

The strategy which was played out  was very  clever  and  by introducing  un substantiated  allegations of defamation at the 11th hour, filed    and bypassing me for  any comment . Playing this game  they got a restraining order when I missed the court date as they had conveniently not served that document  on me   and had  at the last minute lulled me into believing that  an undertaking would  suffice .

When I had the judgement  recalled , the  directors of the law firm Johnston Lawrence Limited   went out of their way to misdirect the court . fortunately the law society are looking into their action .  Defamtion  has a statute of its own  and  defamation has to be pleaded , it cant be alleged.   there is a defence of truth  and honest opinion for defamation , but when you are denied that right of  defence  it leaves you sadly lacking  and  fiction becomes fact  e.g.  a non existent animal welfare institute of New Zealand becomes  the emperors new clothes.

The next one  who has been threatening defamation action is the man who does not know how to stop harassing ;-Malcolm North   who is up to his neck in what  I have proved to be  is   dubious company activity  ( truth )  having    defrauded a young man from  some $64,000  so that his own  son can claim to be the youngest top chef and set up a restaurant without any funds  except those   he ” acquired ” through   the unlawful stroke of a pen .

Malcolm North  is particularly keen that I tell the world that   My  Private investigators certificate was not renewed.   Well  why should I when  this has been over turned on appeal , he is now  seeking advice from the PSPLA  on how to object once again , he is beavering  away in the back ground  spying on me   and  looking at  all possible ways  to discredit me and   cost me income .

This is where today’s   item was very timely  not only does it mention  the use of the court by the corrupt  but it shows the failings of a PI registration  system .

I am, apparently, in the opinion of the ” authority ”  not a suitable person to be a PI  because the ” authority’  did not like me  blogging   or making complaints about lawyers .. I have  the voice recording for any one who wants to confirm this … he ( Roger Gill )  told me in an unofficial meeting  that unless I stop  blogging and making complaints about lawyers that  I  would not get a   certificate  of approval .  I felt that that was a tad blackmailish  and have a firm belief in the right  to hold an opinion and for the  freedom of expression .

So it came as a bit of a surprise to see that Danny Thompson has got his approval through  despite  not having declared previous convictions , I am also aware of others with convictions  who  hold  PI  Licences of COE’s including Gary Swan  who was exonerated   for   facilitating false affidavits of service but because I speak up  against corruption I am a danger to society

the reasons  for declinature.. for which the authority dug   deep were

  1. the allegation that I was warned for blackmail by the police ..  this was not  the case and the  PSPLA actually  had no documents at all   to support this allegation.
  2. I had allegedly stalked  a   woman and her daughter, this was conveniently an anonymous complaint and even thought it allegedly occurred in 2012   was never investigated  it was enough to count against me .. I have a rough idea  who the  vindictive bitch was
  3. then   a matter  which the Pspla had already sat on and  dismissed was  reconsidered  and counted for 2  matters  the fact that the  woman involved,  one Parrisa Hamedi    was living in a housing corp house in Nelson while claiming to be in a defacto relationship  in Auckland   is beside  the point;-  the object of the exercise was to claim as many assets with as few possible bonks.  The lawyer involved Steven Zindel   took her claim to court   just when  the  victim was getting married  .There was no evidence of   defacto relationship , she was still living  with her children and  ex husband and collecting $$$$  from our government and used legal aid to  try and facilitate what I consider  to be a fraud. . Both Zindel and Parisa Hamedi took me to the Pspla  because I told him that  Zindel had an obligation to  ensure that   he did not use the court for an attempted fraud  and  I also provided evidence that there was no  defacto relationship .  I came to  this conclusion four years before the court came to the same conclusion but on the plus side many  lawyers including Zindel  made a few bob on the way  all courtesy of the  tax payer .
  4.  then last but not least   the Johnson Lawrence matter was hurled in my face.

I have to add that on each of the above allegations I was not given a chance to  comment   and it was a  Fait Accompli as far as the authority was concerned

In the appeal papers the PSPLA  had included yet another matter   one of  Dr Gerald Waters  who had complained about my action  You can read all about him here   yes another crim using the court to fight back

So what it all comes down to  is that the court is being used as a weapon of choice to conceal  fraud corruption and crime , it is a tool used by the corrupt ;Tar  the person who is most likely  to expose you  and you  could get away Scott free.

All I have ever wished for  is for half as much investigation to have gone into  AWINZ and Muse on Allen as has gone into me  for standing by the victims of crime .  This can only  lead me to believe that  our society   supports corruption

The private security licencing authority is of the opinion that I believe in some sort of conspiracy  ( his words not mine ) . The reality is  that when you  look for coruppion you find it very easily  because there is so much of it. the only way to  not see it is to walk about with your eyes closed or  be part of the problem

Well  when I read  Lauda Finem and this latest matter    I don’t have to think that there is some   sort of corruption lurking in the justice system;  I know there   is . I have spoken to  people whose  properties have been stolen from them  by  Lawyers who ensured that documents  conveniently went missing from  files . they are trusted  and believable  and  officers of the court .. they would not do that….or would they  ?????

Its like magic   if  you believe something has integrity then you  wont think it can happen… but   its all sleight of hand and concealment and integrity that isn’t actually there

Blogs take the magic away that is why we must be stopped. While ” they”  control the news  , they cant control us . yesterday I heard on the news that we must not believe  what is in blogs .. well I’m not certain  if  we should  actually believe the news either

No one will take away my right to blog  I do so pursuant to my rights under the bill of rights.  I   report the truth     which apparently is frowned upon.  I wonder why  ?

Malcolm North takes a break from Bankruptcy court to do more harassing

muse-owes-160000This week has been a big week  for Malcolm North  He appeared in the Wellington High court  bankruptcy court.  He has  apparently come home to have another go at me, I am becoming very tired of his  bullying behaviour   and  find the only way to deal with him  is through this site

I have responded in Red

From: malcolm north [mailto:malcolm@muserestaurant.co.nz]
Sent: Thursday, 10 November 2016 6:06 p.m.
To: ‘Grace’
Subject: Defamatory Information.

Hello Grace.

I have requested you before to remove the defamatory information from your website and so far you have not done this I don’t have a problem with factual information so can you either remove it or amend it.

Malcolm I have responded to you and  advised you that truth is never  defamatory. I responded  on 30 September , if you care to look at the act you will note that you are grossly out of  time   however  with respect  to the following I will address them 

  • I am not a Business Development Manager with Ministry of Social Development. Not true.

the words used  were ”   I believe”  I may have  got that wrong looking at your earlier emails which were sent  from your business email you  the following   so   perhaps you still hold that position 

 Malcolm North
Employment Broker
Job Connect.
Phone: 0800-778-008  DDI 049137535
Email: malcolm.north004@msd.govt.nz

  • Debbie had no input into setting up the business ( please provide evidence that she did )

Please refer to the companies  register  on the 17th August she   completed and  uploaded her own directors documents  back dating them to the date the company was formed  Director Consent 

apparently it is an offence under the companies act to do that   and also there are no resolutions which allow her to even be appointed as director  but then that  has never made any difference .

Even when she worked for the Dental council she allegedly managed to get a dentist removed from the roll without  following process . 

  • The matter has been before the courts for 4 years not 2 years. Not true.

sorry I erred on the side of caution .. how is that defamatory ? 

  • The Police have advised on 2 occasions  not 4 that we should refrain from emailing you .Not true

It would appear that  it doesn’t matter how many time you get told you keep on emailing.. this is harassment 

  • You are correct that Joszef contributed $65,000 towards setting up the business but you have failed to supply evidence where the balance of the purchase price and further capital came from .If you read the 2012 /2013 you will see a further $79,147 was introduced please provide evidence that this is not the case.

The 2013 and 2014 annual  accounts  show no  introduction of equity annual accounts  It shows  loans which is an introduction of debt  and  Samuel actually took out  more money in the business than he had invested. 

It appears to me that you do not grasp the concept of equity and loans 

  • Please provide evidence that we have defrauded Joszef because we have not seen any.

OK   I will explain this S L O W L Y    You and Debbie were directors of the company with Samuel Director Consent      Director Consent Form      Director Consent

You went home to your flat and without giving the proper notice had a cozy meeting  and  threw Jozsef out  Particulars of Director  the resolution you passed  is here directors-resolution-dated-10-january-2013  note that it is signed by Debbie  

Debbie and  Samuel  were directors when  Jozsefs majority share holding was reduced through no  legal means for the shares to be transferred from  Jozsef to samuel   when there was no paperwork or transactions to  facilitate that Shareholder Consent Form   transferred shares  here  to 49%   and then when you were director took all his shares Here . In my experience  and  my opinion it  is fraudulent   to claim shares which have not been legally transferred  and the person  owning them  has not received compensation  or  consented to the the transfer  .  

As directors of the company you had a legal obligation   to oversee the share register  and in my  humble opinion ,  by allowing this to continue  you became parties to the offence as well as committing offences under the companies  act 

You then   represented the company in court proceedings and passed yourself off as  a lawyer  and  claimed that the shares were transferred in ” error”  but despite this   and over the period of  four years  you never made any attempts to correct the alleged  ” error ” 

  • You are correct about the ownership of the BMW can you please provide evidence that this was paid for from Muse on Allen funds.

The ownership of the vehicle   shows that  it was owned by Muse on Allen , there was a security  interest agaisnt it  in the name of Muse on allen 

the vehicle was then transfered to  the ownership of Catering  Limited   and the PPSR remained with Muse on allen  but changed some months later   .

the registration of the BMW is now 1 Muse 1 

  • We have seen no evidence of bullying yourself and Joszef by myself and Samuel can you please provide this.

It is sad that you do not know what bullying is,   the  many horrible emails which you have sent   the personal comments the below the belt  statements   are privately recorded , only the police have copies of them , they were sufficient for them to warn you a number of times 

  • Your concerns to my employers have been thoroughly investigated and no action has been taken against me.

Time will tell  

  • Could you please provide evidence that Muse on Allen was run into the ground.

Where do I begin 

The company is in liquidation 

It owes $160,000  see here 

I could go on but it  would be boring 

I am receiving calls at my employment about your behaviour in the Hawkes Bay so contrary to what you might think the publicity you are giving me is probably not in your favour.

Now that would be boring    why would any one want to  call you   about me  ,   But I guess that would  be the same  way as people phoning me  about the three of you  

but don’t you  think that the statement you have just made is not bullying  ??????   I think it is  

Trusting this is not seen as bullying  as it is not intended to be as it is only a opportunity for you to amend your postings before I  go to the expense to proceed with defamation proceedings against you.

Yes I do see it as bullying , I wont be amending anything  I   think that this  explanation should serve  any discerning reader  . Long live transparency  

Kind regards

Malcolm North

Ministry of social development employee Malcolm North continues to Bully

I believe that Malcolm North is  a Business development manger  with the ministry of social development .

In 2012 he  and his  wife  Debbie  North  and son  Samuel North , used a young Hungarian chef   to  fund the setting up of the Muse on Allen restaurant.   Once they had his money they turned on him  and removed his as director and   transferred all his shares into  Samuel’s name .

The matter had been  before the court for  some 2 years when  the lawyers   advised that the company was insolvent  . by this stage Jozsef had spent $50,000   on top of the 64,000 which had  been stolen from him .

I prepared  complaints for the  police and for the registrar of companies   they can be found here  Offences  .  The evidence is available  on request  but due to the bulk of  the evidence I have not placed it on the web site .

Neither the police nor registrar of companies would act  because the matter is before the court , the fact that it is before the court  under section 174 of the companies act   appears to  be beside the point   and the many serious  imprison-able offences  are  on the back burner probably awaiting the statute of limitations to pass .

Because I appear to be the only person who has  focused on the  criminal aspect Malcolm has had it in for me.

I have reported his  actions and  those of his son to the police many times and I think they are up to warning  4 .

Just a few weeks ago  Malcolm sought to  cast aspersions on me  with a business group that I belong to  , I  responded by sending an open letter to his wife Debbie  whose actions facilitated this  whole mess  right at the beginning.

Now Malcolm   has threatened legal action   alleging defamation . It is therefore appropriate for me to respond in terms of  section  25 of the defamation act 

the following are the statements which Malcolm alleges to be defamatory .  Truth and honest opinion are never defamatory , truth may be inconvenient  but in the end we are all accountable to the truth

I have for each statement produced the evidence  which  I rely on

The only equity in the business was  the  funds which Jozsef introduced.  Truth  the  evidence is the 2014 accounts . as can be seen  by the end of 2014  the only equity in the company was Jozsef’s  funds , Samuel actually had a deficit .

shae holder accounts

 

In my professional opinion and based on the   evidence I have collated I am of the opinion that all three of you should be locked up for defrauding  Jozsef.

Honest opinion based on 15 years policing experience and  13 years as a private investigator    see the offences as  shown above 

 

Samuel is still driving the  BMW  which he purchased using   the money which  he made out of Muse on allen   and he has now transferred the ownership to  Catering limited.

Truth  I will supply the registration  documents and the  ppsr’s. they can be found  here  as  shown to Muse on Allen here BMW   and transferred to catering co  Here bmw-1muse1 note also the  number plate change but the chassis no etc are the same  good to see that a young man who has just put a company into liquidation can afford  a personalised plate the regos  are.muse-on-allen-ownership-bmwcatering-limited-ownership-bmw

The three of you have  defrauded  Jozsef  , you have   allowed Muse on Allen to be run into the ground and have left a trail of debts.

Honest opinion based on 15 years policing experience and  13 years as a private investigator     offences  and the  credit report of Muse . here muse-on-allen-credit-check  not the defaults and also the fact that  the company is now in liquidation   see here 

Throughout this time   and    to this date you have stood by and allowed your son and husband  to bully and abuse both Jozsef and myself.

Truth  the police have  warned him  at least three times you have apparently done nothing but duck for  cover 

I have communicated my concerns  about Malcolm’s behaviour to the ministry of social development    I do not believe that persons who practices this level of bullying that  in his private life ,  does not  display those same qualities at work .

Honest opinion  the degree of bullying which we have suffered is  unbelievable   there are many emails in which they have made the most  cruel remarks to me  , I am totally  fed up with their  bullying behaviour   

 Often what is not  objected to proves more  than you realise.  In this case Malcolm North  by not claiming  these statements to be defamatory   admits to them as fact   

1. I am writing to you in the hope that   we may be able to   sort out the bullying which I have been suffering at the hands of you husband and son.

2.Jozsef and Sam were the only  directors when the company was  formed. You were  to be an alternate director for Samuel   and  you completed your own forms and backdated your directorship  to day one .  If you were to ask any one at the companies office they would tell you that this is not a lawful  way to do things as you cannot appoint yourself director

3.With your son  You then appointed  Malcolm your husband to be a further director  then all three of you  went home and passed a resolution to remove Jozsef as director

4.As a director of the company  you allowed Samuel to  transfer all of Jozsefs shares into his own name   without any legal basis  and without the introduction of  further equity into the company .

5.Through out  this time   and    to this date you have stood by and allowed your son and husband  to bully and abuse both Jozsef and myself.

6. we have made complaints to the police  under the harmful digital communications act  and   despite the fact that they have been  warned a number of time the abuse has continued

7. Last Year Malcolm made a complaint against my private investigators licence ,   there was no  substance in his complaint

8. His vexatious complaints had me under investigation for some 10 months

Now he is sending emails   to  people associated   with my business

10 If the police did their job and were not busy   dealing with traffic  the three of you would   beheld fully answerable to the  law .

11.I realize that attack is  the best form of defence and that is exactly the only defence which  your son  and husband have

12.Debbie  how about   some integrity  you work for counselors  how about getting some counselign for your  boys   so that they can see  that what they are doing is  pure bullying  and totally un ethical.

 

 

Open letter to Debbie North ,mother of muse restaurant chef Samuel North wife of Malcolm North

This is an open letter to Debbie North Wife of Malcolm North  mother of Samuel North

Debbie  I am writing to you in the hope that   we may be able to   sort out the bullying which I have been suffering at the hands of you husband and son.

I find it quite Ironic that  you  work for “The New Zealand Association of Counsellors “ and are listed as Debbie North membership@nzac.org.nz  on their web site

In 2012  Samuel opened a restaurant Muse on Allen with Jozsef Szekely

Jozsef put in $64,000  and became a 70 % share holder due to the fact that the business had been purchased for $90,000   .

The only equity in the business was  the  funds which Jozsef introduced.

Jozsef and Sam were the only  directors when the company was  formed. You were  to be an alternate director for Samuel   and  you completed your own forms and backdated your directorship  to day one .  If yo were to ask any one at the companies office they would tell you that this is not a lawful  way to do things as you cannot appoint yourself director.

With your son  You then appointed  Malcolm your husband to be a further director  then all three of you  went home and passed a resolution to remove Jozsef as director .

As a director of the company  you allowed Samuel to  transfer all of Jozsefs shares into his own name   without any legal basis  and without the introduction of  further equity into the company .

Court action followed and you eventually resigned as director in  November 2014

Through out this time   and    to this date you have stood by and allowed your son and husband  to bully and abuse both Jozsef and myself.

we have made complaints to the police  under the harmful digital communications act  and   despite the fact that they have been  warned a number of time the abuse has continued

Last Year Malcolm made a complaint against my private investigators licence ,   there was no  substance in his complaint and the authority reported

decision

 

 

 

 

 

 

His vexatious complaints had me under investigation for some 10 months

Now he is sending emails   to  people associated   with my business

From:malcolm@muserestaurant.co.nz [mailto:malcolm@muserestaurant.co.nz]
Sent: Tuesday, 13 September 2016 6:26 p.m.
To:
Subject: Grace Haden

Hello I warned you before Is this the type of person you want in your chapter

Debbie I have had enough of  this .

the three of you have  defrauded  Jozsef  , you have   allowed Muse on Allen to be run into the ground and have left a trail of debts.

Samuel is still driving the  BMW  which he purchased using   the money which  he made out of Muse on Allen   and he has now transferred the ownership to  Catering limited.

If the police did their job and were not busy   dealing with traffic  the three of you would   beheld fully answerable to the  law .

In my professional opinion and based on the   evidence I have collated I am of the opinion that all three of you should be locked up for defrauding  Jozsef.

I realize that attack is  the best form of defence and that is exactly the only defence which  your son  and husband have

Debbie  how about   some integrity  you work for counselors  how about getting some counselign for your  boys   so that they can see  that what they are doing is  pure bullying  and totally un ethical.

I have communicated my concerns  about Malcolm’s behavior to the ministry of social development    I do not believe that persons who practices this level of bullying that  in his private life ,  does not  display those same qualities at work .

PLEASE HELP STAMP OUT BULLYING  AND FRAUD .

Muse Eatery is it or is it not connected to Muse on Allen ?or what does this say about Samuel Norths integrity ?

Former fine dining restaurant Muse on Allen put into liquidation by IRD

Let us play a game of Truth or lies    We won’t tell you which is which  But  lets just look at the facts  the following are statements made in the  news item  highlighted above  click here for the article 

“The former Muse on Allen restaurant has been put into liquidation”. see the answer here    well that was straight forward enough  but now lets try this one

 

 

Owner Samuel North says it is not connected to his new business, Muse Eatery and Bar, on Victoria St.

Lets look at the web page for Muse eatery  lets look at the about page 

do you see what I see ?

Muse eatery and bar former muse on allen relocated

 

 

On the  home page  we note that  Muse eatery claims to be wellington on a plate Muse

But in the article  Samuel North  claims are reported as

His current business Muse Eatery & Bar on Victoria St was not connected to the liquidated business, he said.

It was owned by Catering Limited, of which he is the sole director.

Catering limited  was incorporated 03 Dec 2015    so   How could  Muse eatery  , owned by Catering limited   have won  the above awards  the news items clearly show that  these awards were for Muse on Allen?

Samuel was indeed very fortunate to have  Sarah Meikle as a friend  see here      read more about her  here Five Minutes with Visa Wellington On a Plate director Sarah Meikle.

the trip advisor reviews  https://www.facebook.com/MuseEateryBar/app/254084314702229/  are   coincidentally all those of Muse on Allen  see here 

I particularly  love the way that in the midst of the article which  claims that “Muse Eatery & Bar on Victoria St was not connected to the liquidated business”( muse on allen )   there are several links  being

READ MORE:
Cafe Chat: Muse is moving, Wellington Wine, Food & Craft Beer Festival is nigh
Cafe Chat: Muse’s new look
Restaurant review: Muse on Allen offers five star experience

notable quotes are

Muse On Allen restaurant has been at the address for three and a half years, but will reopen at 56 Victoria St, formerly home to 3C Bar and Restaurant.”

“When the restaurant reopens in the first week of March, it’ll be serving lunch for the first time in addition to dinner, with plans for a breakfast service, too.”

Muse’s new look

Muse’s success continues 

Muse has been open for a month at its new Victoria St premises

 

Now is a good time now to visit Facebook the link is found at the bottom of  the Muse eatery  web site https://www.facebook.com/MuseEateryBar/  keep scrolling

7 April  2016

http://www.wellingtonnz.com/discover/word-on-the-street/see-and-do/circas-triumph-and-a-little-a-muse-bouche/

muse on allen have now re opened in chews lane

 

 

 

 

 

 

17 feb    Link  Muse has closed its Allen St doors, and is to reopen in Victoria St.

muse on allen to relocate

Muse On Allen restaurant has been at the address for three and a half years, but will reopen at 56 Victoria St, formerly home to 3C Bar and Restaurant.

Muse owner and director Samuel North says the new space offers the restaurant a chance to expand its services. 

Since opening the fine dining establishment as a 21-year-old, North has grown Muse into an award-winning success story.

When the restaurant reopens in the first week of March, it’ll be serving lunch for the first time in addition to dinner, with plans for a breakfast service, too.

 

Muse’s trademark purple decor will remain, as will its seven staff and favourite dishes such as the beef tartare, tuna sashimi, and creme brulee with doughnuts.

The high-ceilinged, bamboo-floored space in Victoria St is double the size of Muse’s original premises  more 

 

 

 

 

16 February

we are on the move

 

it will be muse eatery

 

 

 

 

 

Back in  2015 we saved the muse restaurantMuse on Allen page     the reality is the facebook  pages are the same  they have just been renamed happened when the restaurant shifted

 

muse eatery

 

by the way notice anything  about the Logos ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

now look at theat the bottom of this post you can see the  domain names  museonallen.co.nz    is registered at the  domain name registry   and shows this   full record saved for prosperity here “museonallen.co.nz” (Active) _ Domain Name Commission  is recorded to Malcolm@museeatery.co.nz
domain name museonallen.co.nz

 

museeatery.co.nz   is the  web site which   Samuel Norths “new” restaurant uses

Samuel North uses the  email address samuel@muserestaurant.co.nz  his father Malcolm uses malcolm@muserestaurant.co.nz
this is what happens  when you look up muserestaurant.co.nz   or see the preserved  hard copy here “muserestaurant.co.nz” (Active) _ Domain Name Commission

 

Strangely enough the domain name was registered to Jozsef Szekely   who happens to be the person  who sank his life savings into Muse of Allen before being removed by  Samuel, Malcolm and Debbie north  as a director  see here 

Samuel then  transferred all of Jozsefs shares into his own name   in two steps   here and here   when no  corresponding transaction had occurred in the actual company books  and  when Jozsef was the only person to have  equity in the company see here   this is   why there was a  court  matter  “After court North said his the debt stemmed from a legal battle he had with a business partner when Muse first opened” Jozsef basically took offence to being ripped off to the tune of $64,000.    strange that the bill to IRD is about that size  .. coincidence ?

we do hope that the liquidators  look at the  accounts closely    we are not book keepers  but  the accounts for Muse on Allen  certainly appear to have  more than one issue.

we don’t know what you think  but  we are pretty certain that muse on Allen and Muse eatery are one and the same  .

 

New Zealand , how we facilitate sham trusts

This post is prompted by the  Editorial: NZ needs to assure world of trust scrutiny.

It is one which I will forward  along with  other blogs to international agencies who may wish to question  how  one of the worlds least corrupt countries  can make this claim and I wish to reveal how trusts work in New Zealand

In 2006  I questioned the lack of existence of  trust , this trust just happened to be  one of two private law enforcement agencies, this trust  the animal welfare institute of  New Zealand  (AWINZ ) taught me all you need to know about NZ  trusts  and how loosely they operate

AWINZ operated  as an equivalent to the RNZSPCA  and enforced animal welfare law ,  It had  powers of search and  the ability to seize some ones prized pet .

I was asked the simple question , who is AWINZ ? when I discovered that it was nothing  but a sham  and  questioned the existence of a sham trust being a law enforcement authority  I was immediately sued,  denied a defence  and   was told to pay some $100,000  dollars to the  person who wrote the animal welfare bill and  was independent adviser to the select committee  in the process of making his business plan , law .

He then made an application , which in my days  as a police officer would have been considered fraud . ( this is due to the fact that the claim that  AWINZ  was a trust was totally false  the application made 22 November 1999  predated  he formation of any organisation  by that name  the earliest trust deed and one which Mr Wells relies upon was  dated 1.3.2000  and even those persons never met  or passed a resolution )

I have  for years  been beaten up   for blowing this whistle. Below I have a list of links of how I have beaten my head against a brick wall for many years  but for now I will reveal how New Zealand trusts work

  1.  You need a trust deed  .. it doesn’t matter when you sign it  or who signs it  as  long as there is a deed a bit of paper which looks convincing.
  2. you can have various copies of the deed  they can all conflict and no one cares see here  and here 
  3. no one enforces the deed, no one cares if the so called trust  complies with its deed
  4. If you want a new deed  you simply  write a new one and refer to an earlier deed which may or may not have existed  , Ird  does not care  I  rather suspect that most people at IRD are number crunchers and done understand the legalities of dates names and real persons  being involved in a trust .
  5. there is more information on the deed with regards to the  identity of the  witnesses than  with regards to the  the trustees.  you can use generic names  and who could ever identify  the trustees
  6. if a trust does not  meet  or hold any assets  or pass  any resolutions it is still considered a trust  and its identity can be used  to interchange with any other trust ( real or fictional )
  7. the charities commission  are happy to grant charity status to anything  whihc meets their criteria , the fact that  there are no resolutions for the trust and  big gaping holes in   their existence is but a technicality

 

Let me explain in terms of the AWINZ  trust

As stated earlier Neil Wells a barrister at the time  made an application for law enforcement powers for AWINZ  he claimed on 22 November 1999 that a trust had been formed

trust formed

 

 

 

 

 

 

No  executed trust deed existed and these people had not formally met together  or passed  any resolution

Maf and The dog control section of Waitakere council had signed agreements with the representative of AWINZ:- Neil Wells

in 2006  Neither MAF nor Waitakere city council had a trust deed or had seen one : basically no one had checked  the existence of AWINZ

when I proved that AWINZ did not exist  ( charitable trusts need to be registered ) a trust deed materialized dated 1.3.2000  whihc brings about the question how can  you make an application before a trust is  formed. ?

I was to get evidence that these people had never met   never held any assets , never passed a resolution.

By the terms of the deed the trust ceased to exist  three years after it was formed, continuance depended on reappointment of trustees and since they never met no one was  reappointed.

reappointment

 

 

 

 

Wells sought charitable status in 2006  when new legislation came in. IRD rejected the trust deed   so he simply wrote a new one  and they claimed to be a continuation of the bogus 2000 trust 2006 deed

 

 

 

this was totally acceptable to the lawyers charity commission and  MAF ( and later the government )

AWINZ was finally removed as  approved Organisation in 2010  .  the fictional  law enforcemnt organisation  operated  for  10 years  re branding council property  and using the  Council staff under Neil Wells control  as AWINZ officers  .

Neil wells still consults for government and makes submissions  strange  that he does not refer to the 10 years where he was the only person involved with AWINZ

this is how what I considered to be a fraud  worked

 

I have brought it to the attention of the prime minister , Transparency International NZ , Auckland Council  and again here , here , here, again here ,    here, here , here ,Auckland Mayor, the CEO of council , council lawyers and again here  and here  , here, here.

I have written to the lawyers involved and again here  and here, here, here , the law society by way of  regarding the lawyers  , the charities commission  and again here   and here

Maf and  now the ministry of primary Industries  repeatedly fobbed me off and actively concealed the fraud, after all they never checked to see if the trust existed before supporting the application for law enforcement status , I was later to find that the current lawyer for Maf was involved int he process earlier on when he was  working for crown law  so I guess his own work came under scrutiny therefore    concealment of the fraud was an act of self defence  complaints to Maf Here  , here, here , here, here,here, here, here and here

The people posing as trustees  here, and here,here, here

attorney general  here

I had questions asked in parliament  Here  wrote to ministers  here  and here 

notable blogs of the past   touching on the  corruption which  exist in New Zealand

NZ one of world’s least corrupt countries- its done with bogus trusts

Disparity in crime.. who you know matters

Approved and acceptable standards for document service in New Zealand

Questioning corruption in New Zealand.

Corruption in New Zealand – lack of support for whistleblowers

The perfect fraud – Public money for private gain

Liquidation as a tool of oppression

shooting the messenger

Why I am calling for an independent commission against corruption

Conclusion  :  Fraudulent trusts are condoned in New Zealand , I was silenced because I was exposing how slack our trust  administration was .

more to come   Court is used to   silence exposure of abuse of overseas trusts

 

New Zealand Trusts and Companies .. our unsafe system hits a new low.

The reason that our company and trust structure is  so well liked  is  because  THERE IS NO DUE DILIGENCE DONE BY THE  REGISTRARS OF  NEW ZEALAND COMPANIES  AND  TRUSTS ARE NOT  RECORDED.

ADDITIONALLY

Few realize that  our trust and company structure is actually most abused through lawyers who in turn are  protected by  our courts .

I am a whistle blower on  the corrupt use of trusts , I   thought that in this country which at the time prided itself to be the least corrupt  that I could say   ” hey guess what  the law enforcement agency  The animal welfare institute of New Zealand  does not  exist at all ”  what happened? lawyers got together   sued me for  a ridiculous sum  tried to bankrupt me  and  tried to put my company out of business. they were protected by their own society   and the judges who were once members of that very society.

I have come to realize that the biggest gang in town  are the lawyers.    Its like complaining about  a gang  member and then being told to speak to the gang  leaders if   you feel there is a problem   . If it is some one they want to dispose of  it will be useful to them  but if the person is in the ” in crowd ” and their activities make the gang look bad  then there is a huge cover up.  I have even had instances where he judges  have gone  way out on a limb to  silence the entire matter  one of those instances was  with regards to a well published Russian lawyer  who was up  to his neck in  trust companies  such as those refereed to in the panama papers.

Just recently I assisted a young man who had had all of his  shares fraudulently transferred from him and  into the name of his business partner the minority share holder .Effectively  he had his business stolen from him . We managed to get a lawyer  appointed for the company who was taking instructions from the very person who  was involved in the theft of the shares.  I told the lawyer for the company that he had a duty to be independent  ie act for the company and  to act according to  the rules and could not condone the   illegal activities of the company.  The result  :-the lawyer  made false complaint  alleging  that I was in contempt of court and had committed  blackmail  when I  wrote to him and pointed out this section of the law  I was promptly taken to court for harassment In Wellington when I lived in Auckland . The date of the hearing was conveniently left off the papers I was served  and the evidence  is such that I am convinced that the court, the registrars and the lawyers  all  conspire together to   ensure that lawyers make a healthy living and no one dares question their activities.

As a result I now have a legal bill.. yes their fees   of over $6,000  . I have a solution  I will be  selling  an e book exposing their tactics of winning  and every cent that I raise will go settling this ” debt”  if there is interest  I will simply sell more copies . I suspect that   with the  publication of the panama papers this  e book  could be quite popular as the  companies  legislation abuse and the manner  in which some  law firms condone  unlawful transactions  is central to makign the company structure in NZ a mockery

New Zealand is far more corrupt than you  can imagine.

any one wishing to  receive a copy of the  e book    can pre order shortly