Archive for January 2016
Our view is yes to both depending on who you are
Please click on the link above or here to make a submission prior to Monday 1 feb http://www.parliament.nz/en-nz/pb/sc/make-submission/0SCHE_SCF_51DBHOH_PET63268_1/petition-of-hon-maryan-street-and-8974-others
Submission of Grace Haden
I am a former police officer and work as a private investigator. I have been sued for speaking the truth on corruption. My marriage was attacked and all sorts of cruel legal tactics came into play.
Things became so bad that at one stage I considered suicide and therefore believe that I am qualified.
Legal tactics include attacking a person’s character and reputation , I considered myself as a strong person but the years erode your strength and you are repeatedly portrayed as a sinister being when in reality you are the opposite.
I have often wondered how many people who are involved in litigation ae pushed over the edge , there are no apparent surveys done on this , no public money is made available. Yet for those who drown we have bucket loads of research and we actively strive to reduce the road toll and enforce all sorts of measure and throw tons of money at prevention.
The annual road toll and he drownings are far smaller than the annual suicide rate. And let’s not forget that some of the figures in the road toll and drownings will be suicides .
On the one hand our society is reckless with regards to suicide and encourages those who are healthy but stressed commit suicide because of the apparent lack of justice while those who have no hope of ever living a life without pain and suffering are denied this right due to lack of physical capacity.
In our current civil litigation system there is “a win at all cost mentality” this takes no consideration of a person’s mental health and wellbeing and is aimed to ensure their entire life collapse around their ears and isolate them from support and loved ones , even he very strong will eventually feel that they are just a very bad person .. these are mind games
For the past 10 years I have studies the tactical methods which seek to bully and undermine good people involved in the judicial system part of this is giving them an appearance in the eyes of others to be sinister and when the court supports the opposition few will believe that this person is a victim of a screwed up justice system which relies on ancient protocols instead of evidence.
If we were to interview the relatives and friends of a suicide victim I believe that a disproportionate number of incidents would show some kind of legal issue in the background.
Our primitive justice system does not consider emotions and the civil jurisdiction does not have to comply with the rules of fairness like our criminal jurisdiction does.
On the other hand those who live life without hope and lack the capacity to take their own life but have the mental capacity to know that future life is futile and will not improve must sit and wait till nature takes over.
If you have a pet and allow it to continue to live in those circumstances you would be prosecuted under the animal welfare act
If you have a pet and bully and torment it so that it shys away from others and finds itself unworthy you could also face prosecution but these tactics are totally acceptable if the victim is a human.
The reality is that we would have far more rights and protection if the animal welfare act was to apply to us
Those with a terminal illness have a right to die, those facing litigation should not be pushed into it
We need proper research into the causes of suicide and we need to have as much money spent on suicide prevention as we spend on the reducing drownings and road toll and if the government will not fund lifesaving medication for those suffering illness or if no remedy is available they should not be forced to die a slow agonising death
Amazingly such an approach will actually reduce our suicide rate by keeping healthy people alive and allowing those terminally ill the right to die .
I wish to be heard on my submissions
The herald reported in an article headlined
Stonewalling and strange deals: Has NZ become more corrupt? that New Zealand’s public sector is the most corrupt it has been in almost 20 years
On the other hand we believe that the public sector is very corrupt but we are now getting more exposure on that which has previously been carefully concealed.
Transparency Intentional New Zealand published a Media Release Document in which Susan Snively states
“Our government must act immediately to reestablish New Zealand’s stand-out reputation for a trusted public sector”. says Transparency International New Zealand Chair, Suzanne Snively. “New Zealand trades on its corruption free reputation.”
Snively’s comment proves the short sighted focus of Transparency International New Zealand inc of keeping the corruption free appearance alive.
We can only hope that Transparency International NZ is encouraging our government to take a hard line and enforce the law against those who are corrupt rather than pretend it is not happening.
We support Transparency internationals statement that ” Not one single country anywhere in the world is corruption free ” so why does Susan Snively wish to give New Zealand the apparition of being corruption free? As an economist she apparently sees this as a good move for the economy. We see her efforts as encouraging the concealment of corruption there by making the country a very dangerous place to trade in .
There are two ways to improve the corruption perception index
- convince every one that there is no corruption by suing those who are whistle blowers or show any hint of exposing corruption .
- prosecute those who engage in corrupt practices so as to discourage others.
From and economist point of view it is much cheaper to conceal corruption and in New Zealand transparency International NZ incorporated in our opinion appears to play a vital role in the concealment of corruption as its members include the very Public sector agencies whose performance is being rated.
We encourage the truth and transparency when it comes to corruption but Transparency International NZ ‘s Susan Snively appears to have a severe conflict of interst see www.kiwisfirst.com
Thank you for your letter Malcolm alleging that I have been defaming you . I am communicating with you through this site as I have previously advised you that you are harassing and bullying us and that my only communication with you will be in an open transparent forum. I had no desire to communicate with you but your barrage of insulting emails and below the belt communications leave this as the only viable option. it is quite clear that you are ignoring the police warning email to muse restaurant 171115
Your dear son let it slip that he had been communicating with Neil Wells who years ago won a defamation case against me by having my defence of truth and honest opinions struck out when he ensured that so much shit was going down in my life that my marriage fell to bits and my family was torn apart. I was unable to come up with a payment of 19,000 due to the bank accounts being frozen for the divorce . Dirty tactics and desperation run deep
Neil had a secret one which I had stumbled on and I had to be silenced at all costs. He had written legislation for his own business plan and as ” independent adviser to the select committee he ensured that this legislation became law.
He then made a fraudulent application under the act to the minister , falsely stating that AWINZ was a trust when the reality is that no such trust existed and AWINZ was in reality a nothing . ( it is fraud to make a false statement which people then act upon.. this is fact )
AWINZ became a law enforcement authority, because no one checked that it existed , it had powers that equaled those of the RNZSPCA search seizure .
Neil Wells used the staff at Waitakere city as AWINZ animal welfare officers and as their council boss he wore two hats and made them prioritize animal welfare over their council paid duties.He rebranded the council premises so that no one knew where AWINZ began and council finished all in all AWINZ appeared to exist the reality it was funded through the public purse for private pecuniary gain. ( evidence is on this site and on anticorruption.co.nz )
If an animal welfare prosecution eventuated Neil Wells performed in his capacity as barrister and would offer diversion for a donation to the “charity”AWINZ which in reality did not exist other than the bank account which he had opened and was the sole operator of.
that was my first experience of civil litigation ,Neil has ensured that it would not be my last and has been stirring up any one who I mention on this site .
I was taken to court last year by the lawyers who represented Muse on Allen . Documents were filed which claimed that Jozsefs share holding had been removed in error . The lawyer representing he company did not like me telling him that if it was an error then the error should be corrected. I pointed out that when new annual reports are filed in the companies office then the error appears not to be an error. there have now been three annual returns filed since Jozsefs share holdings were claimed to have been transferred in error .
The lawyer also did not like me telling him that he had a legal duty to act independently for his client which is the company and that the company is a separate legal entity from the directors who by all accounts had allowed Jozsefs shares to be transferred illegally
so the lawyers took me to court for harassment this is after having falsely accused me of contempt of court and blackmail . Apparently it is harassment to tell a lawyer that he should not be going round making false allegations and that he has a duty to be independent and act according to the rule of law.
when the lawyer made a song and dance about the unusualness of his name I contacted his father who I had served with in the Police, I stupidly thought that by speaking to the lawyers father who I had known very well I might be able to put an end to this madness but instead every innocent act gets turned into something sinister and I am made out to be a beast
Documents were withheld from me including the court hearing date . When the papers were served there was an initial court date given as usual . the matter was was set down for hearing and I thought it strange that I had not been advised of the date but this often happens near the end of the year. I discovered the true date after a bit of game play by the lawyers and at 9 am on the morning of the hearing I was told that I had to appear at 10. slight problem the hearing was in Wellington and I live in Auckland .
I was later to find out that there were other documents which the court had been given and which had conveniently not been served on me. These documents were submissions which alleged defamation of the lawyer .
So without any legal defamation process and without any right to defend myself or even knowing that I had been accused of defamation, I became a serial defamer and harasser seething which Malcolm North now uses to spout on about to defame me . In the mean time his son who has claimed the restaurant as his own but has no equity in the place slings below the belt emails at me at christmas time telling me that I am hated and alleging that my former husband and children are among those and that I don’t have any family to enjoy christmas with . I know this not to be true and I resent a kid younger than my children bullying me in such a manner.
It turns out that Neil Wells has been in the back ground following my every move and prompting every one I have contact with to make such allegations. The same happened with my former lawyer who was stuck off last year. the court stepped in and with a confidentiality clause all was dealt with minute Judge Sargisson.
Neil Wells was also on the scene when I conducted an investigation into Fresh prepared and he ensured that harassment proceeding were also commenced in that matter. The fact that one person Terry Hay had never seen me or been contacted by me was beside the point . Mr Terry Hay was later charged with 22 counts of fraud but skipped the country and paid his way out of a conviction
I’m getting a little bit over this use of he court by criminals to attack those who have no ability to get the government to act on criminal matters. In this case the Registrar of companies appears to do nothing to control the use of companies and the police are too busy reducing the road toll but driving more people to suicide .
Malcolm and Sam are no exception we have had repeated admissions from them of their crime
“Thanks for letting us know we have got away with theft fraud and a raft of companies act offences that is very reassuring “
Malcolm has stated openly that the police are not going to arrest them , he is grossly derogatory and totally gets his facts wrong as usual which his bosses at the MSD don’t appear to mind . But Attack is the best form of defence and attack is the only defence these people have
yet on the other hand he expresses in an email that he does not wish to spend the next christmas behind bars due to my fraud complaint and would like to negotiate a settlement with Jozsef. An innocent person would not have those worries
So far the settlement offers have been a total insult. Is this the way of the future a criminal rips you off breaks a raft of laws then says hey I will give you two and tuppence halfpenny so that it can all go away .
Malcolm has asked me to publish the following
I have amended the publication he has complained of accordingly but the other statement was made to the link broker who is selling the business Buy a Restaurant & Bar-too Good Opportunity To Miss For Sale, business for sale Wellington, New Zealand . We stand by our statements they are true and will defend the truth . the police fraud file is 151010/8943
Malcolm could you please clarify how you can take action against Jozsef for being a 63.2% share holder yet not consult him in the sale of the business your own accounts show that he is the only person with equity in the business see here . Samuel who unlawfully transferred all of Jozsefs shares to himself acted with the consent of the other directors of which you are one. You are all in it together .
Malcolm I will send a copy of this to the business broker to clarify the statements which you mistakenly think are defamatory
Happy to respond again to any further emails through this forum
Update continuing bullying and harassment
it would appear that Malcolm is incapable of seeing the alterations made despite the fact that they are highlighted
the latest abuse from these bullies and an admission that Neil Wells is behind it all
will soon put up a post with Trevor Morely who asked them not to divulge that they had contact him if they are on about laughs I can provide some good ones. when some one calls some one a name it usually means they are looking in a mirror .We are just after justice and did not subscribe to this on going crap .