Today was supposed to be a day in the garden but this morning a friend sent me a link to lauda Finem
I have had to have a giggle over the article as it parallels what is going on in my life .. believe me though it is no laughing matter its probably more of a Yeh Im not the only one on to it giggle
in 2006 I discovered that the animal welfare institute of New Zealand ( awinz).. an approved organisation under the animal welfare act with coercive search and seizure powers.. did not exist. I was taken to court for defamation ..denied a defence of truth and honest opinion . they attacked my marriage my family and spat me out the other end. All in the name of concealment of corruption
Next up were the directors of fresh prepared , represented by Peter Spring of Keegan Alexander .. these news items speak volumes Boss invents accountant to escape $60k debt and Charges over alleged fake liquidator Yes I had discovered the lack of existence of the director l and the liquidator.. this made me a threat to society and was taken to court for harassment , I had not done anything but they came up with things like ..last night the bosses truck was broken into we thought it was her , then we found it wasn’t.
I took on a human rights lawyer .He stripped me of serious cash then took me to court for harassment because of what I knew . , I had not even breathed a word but he feared what he thought I knew .. yes the equivalent of the panama papers but three years earlier . It is no surprise that now has a Panamanian address and is no longer a lawyer in NZ .
The court has sorted that one out with its invisibility cloak .. I am not allowed to use his name and looking back I am not sure who he was working for it certainly was not for me
Next Neil Wells the man behind AWINZ succeeded in getting my company liquidated, he did this by using translegal to not served papers on me , so I was blissfully unaware of the action until it was too late. I caught the document server out and the liquidation was reversed. A lady contacted me and they were trying to take one of her children away from her they were the the parents of the sperm donor ( now deceased ) they decided that they wanted the child so the proceedings were commenced using a trans legal document server , who had 30 previous convictions for dishonesty and is still in the business. She did not get an apology I did at the direction of hte court they were supposed to put it on their web page but took it down in a flash here is the translegal-apology
The next to sue me for harassment was another lawyer one who was representing Muse on Allen.. of the law firm Johnston Lawrence Limited , I made the fatal mistake of telling him that he should act according to the rule of law and not support criminal action . The directors of muse on Allen Malcolm North , Debbie north and Samuel North , had transferred shares representing a young mans total investment in a company into the name of Samuel north they called this an “error ” I pointed out that after three years ” errors” can no longer be called ” errors “if they are acknowledged and not corrected. .. that worth taking harassment action over.. guess it prevents a claim of using your office to facilitate fraud. the lawyer had himself removed from the court action in a confidential application to the court .
The strategy which was played out was very clever and by introducing un substantiated allegations of defamation at the 11th hour, filed and bypassing me for any comment . Playing this game they got a restraining order when I missed the court date as they had conveniently not served that document on me and had at the last minute lulled me into believing that an undertaking would suffice .
When I had the judgement recalled , the directors of the law firm Johnston Lawrence Limited went out of their way to misdirect the court . fortunately the law society are looking into their action . Defamtion has a statute of its own and defamation has to be pleaded , it cant be alleged. there is a defence of truth and honest opinion for defamation , but when you are denied that right of defence it leaves you sadly lacking and fiction becomes fact e.g. a non existent animal welfare institute of New Zealand becomes the emperors new clothes.
The next one who has been threatening defamation action is the man who does not know how to stop harassing ;-Malcolm North who is up to his neck in what I have proved to be is dubious company activity ( truth ) having defrauded a young man from some $64,000 so that his own son can claim to be the youngest top chef and set up a restaurant without any funds except those he ” acquired ” through the unlawful stroke of a pen .
Malcolm North is particularly keen that I tell the world that My Private investigators certificate was not renewed. Well why should I when this has been over turned on appeal , he is now seeking advice from the PSPLA on how to object once again , he is beavering away in the back ground spying on me and looking at all possible ways to discredit me and cost me income .
This is where today’s item was very timely not only does it mention the use of the court by the corrupt but it shows the failings of a PI registration system .
I am, apparently, in the opinion of the ” authority ” not a suitable person to be a PI because the ” authority’ did not like me blogging or making complaints about lawyers .. I have the voice recording for any one who wants to confirm this … he ( Roger Gill ) told me in an unofficial meeting that unless I stop blogging and making complaints about lawyers that I would not get a certificate of approval . I felt that that was a tad blackmailish and have a firm belief in the right to hold an opinion and for the freedom of expression .
So it came as a bit of a surprise to see that Danny Thompson has got his approval through despite not having declared previous convictions , I am also aware of others with convictions who hold PI Licences of COE’s including Gary Swan who was exonerated for facilitating false affidavits of service but because I speak up against corruption I am a danger to society
the reasons for declinature.. for which the authority dug deep were
- the allegation that I was warned for blackmail by the police .. this was not the case and the PSPLA actually had no documents at all to support this allegation.
- I had allegedly stalked a woman and her daughter, this was conveniently an anonymous complaint and even thought it allegedly occurred in 2012 was never investigated it was enough to count against me .. I have a rough idea who the vindictive bitch was
- then a matter which the Pspla had already sat on and dismissed was reconsidered and counted for 2 matters the fact that the woman involved, one Parrisa Hamedi was living in a housing corp house in Nelson while claiming to be in a defacto relationship in Auckland is beside the point;- the object of the exercise was to claim as many assets with as few possible bonks. The lawyer involved Steven Zindel took her claim to court just when the victim was getting married .There was no evidence of defacto relationship , she was still living with her children and ex husband and collecting $$$$ from our government and used legal aid to try and facilitate what I consider to be a fraud. . Both Zindel and Parisa Hamedi took me to the Pspla because I told him that Zindel had an obligation to ensure that he did not use the court for an attempted fraud and I also provided evidence that there was no defacto relationship . I came to this conclusion four years before the court came to the same conclusion but on the plus side many lawyers including Zindel made a few bob on the way all courtesy of the tax payer .
- then last but not least the Johnson Lawrence matter was hurled in my face.
I have to add that on each of the above allegations I was not given a chance to comment and it was a Fait Accompli as far as the authority was concerned
In the appeal papers the PSPLA had included yet another matter one of Dr Gerald Waters who had complained about my action You can read all about him here yes another crim using the court to fight back
So what it all comes down to is that the court is being used as a weapon of choice to conceal fraud corruption and crime , it is a tool used by the corrupt ;Tar the person who is most likely to expose you and you could get away Scott free.
All I have ever wished for is for half as much investigation to have gone into AWINZ and Muse on Allen as has gone into me for standing by the victims of crime . This can only lead me to believe that our society supports corruption
The private security licencing authority is of the opinion that I believe in some sort of conspiracy ( his words not mine ) . The reality is that when you look for coruppion you find it very easily because there is so much of it. the only way to not see it is to walk about with your eyes closed or be part of the problem
Well when I read Lauda Finem and this latest matter I don’t have to think that there is some sort of corruption lurking in the justice system; I know there is . I have spoken to people whose properties have been stolen from them by Lawyers who ensured that documents conveniently went missing from files . they are trusted and believable and officers of the court .. they would not do that….or would they ?????
Its like magic if you believe something has integrity then you wont think it can happen… but its all sleight of hand and concealment and integrity that isn’t actually there
Blogs take the magic away that is why we must be stopped. While ” they” control the news , they cant control us . yesterday I heard on the news that we must not believe what is in blogs .. well I’m not certain if we should actually believe the news either
No one will take away my right to blog I do so pursuant to my rights under the bill of rights. I report the truth which apparently is frowned upon. I wonder why ?
This week has been a big week for Malcolm North He appeared in the Wellington High court bankruptcy court. He has apparently come home to have another go at me, I am becoming very tired of his bullying behaviour and find the only way to deal with him is through this site
I have responded in Red
From: malcolm north [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Thursday, 10 November 2016 6:06 p.m.
Subject: Defamatory Information.
I have requested you before to remove the defamatory information from your website and so far you have not done this I don’t have a problem with factual information so can you either remove it or amend it.
Malcolm I have responded to you and advised you that truth is never defamatory. I responded on 30 September , if you care to look at the act you will note that you are grossly out of time however with respect to the following I will address them
- I am not a Business Development Manager with Ministry of Social Development. Not true.
the words used were ” I believe” I may have got that wrong looking at your earlier emails which were sent from your business email you the following so perhaps you still hold that position
Phone: 0800-778-008 DDI 049137535
- Debbie had no input into setting up the business ( please provide evidence that she did )
Please refer to the companies register on the 17th August she completed and uploaded her own directors documents back dating them to the date the company was formed Director Consent
apparently it is an offence under the companies act to do that and also there are no resolutions which allow her to even be appointed as director but then that has never made any difference .
Even when she worked for the Dental council she allegedly managed to get a dentist removed from the roll without following process .
- The matter has been before the courts for 4 years not 2 years. Not true.
sorry I erred on the side of caution .. how is that defamatory ?
- The Police have advised on 2 occasions not 4 that we should refrain from emailing you .Not true
It would appear that it doesn’t matter how many time you get told you keep on emailing.. this is harassment
- You are correct that Joszef contributed $65,000 towards setting up the business but you have failed to supply evidence where the balance of the purchase price and further capital came from .If you read the 2012 /2013 you will see a further $79,147 was introduced please provide evidence that this is not the case.
The 2013 and 2014 annual accounts show no introduction of equity annual accounts It shows loans which is an introduction of debt and Samuel actually took out more money in the business than he had invested.
It appears to me that you do not grasp the concept of equity and loans
- Please provide evidence that we have defrauded Joszef because we have not seen any.
You went home to your flat and without giving the proper notice had a cozy meeting and threw Jozsef out Particulars of Director the resolution you passed is here directors-resolution-dated-10-january-2013 note that it is signed by Debbie
Debbie and Samuel were directors when Jozsefs majority share holding was reduced through no legal means for the shares to be transferred from Jozsef to samuel when there was no paperwork or transactions to facilitate that Shareholder Consent Form transferred shares here to 49% and then when you were director took all his shares Here . In my experience and my opinion it is fraudulent to claim shares which have not been legally transferred and the person owning them has not received compensation or consented to the the transfer .
As directors of the company you had a legal obligation to oversee the share register and in my humble opinion , by allowing this to continue you became parties to the offence as well as committing offences under the companies act
You then represented the company in court proceedings and passed yourself off as a lawyer and claimed that the shares were transferred in ” error” but despite this and over the period of four years you never made any attempts to correct the alleged ” error ”
- You are correct about the ownership of the BMW can you please provide evidence that this was paid for from Muse on Allen funds.
The ownership of the vehicle shows that it was owned by Muse on Allen , there was a security interest agaisnt it in the name of Muse on allen
the vehicle was then transfered to the ownership of Catering Limited and the PPSR remained with Muse on allen but changed some months later .
the registration of the BMW is now 1 Muse 1
- We have seen no evidence of bullying yourself and Joszef by myself and Samuel can you please provide this.
It is sad that you do not know what bullying is, the many horrible emails which you have sent the personal comments the below the belt statements are privately recorded , only the police have copies of them , they were sufficient for them to warn you a number of times
- Your concerns to my employers have been thoroughly investigated and no action has been taken against me.
Time will tell
- Could you please provide evidence that Muse on Allen was run into the ground.
Where do I begin
The company is in liquidation
It owes $160,000 see here
I could go on but it would be boring
I am receiving calls at my employment about your behaviour in the Hawkes Bay so contrary to what you might think the publicity you are giving me is probably not in your favour.
Now that would be boring why would any one want to call you about me , But I guess that would be the same way as people phoning me about the three of you
but don’t you think that the statement you have just made is not bullying ?????? I think it is
Trusting this is not seen as bullying as it is not intended to be as it is only a opportunity for you to amend your postings before I go to the expense to proceed with defamation proceedings against you.
Yes I do see it as bullying , I wont be amending anything I think that this explanation should serve any discerning reader . Long live transparency
I believe that Malcolm North is a Business development manger with the ministry of social development .
In 2012 he and his wife Debbie North and son Samuel North , used a young Hungarian chef to fund the setting up of the Muse on Allen restaurant. Once they had his money they turned on him and removed his as director and transferred all his shares into Samuel’s name .
The matter had been before the court for some 2 years when the lawyers advised that the company was insolvent . by this stage Jozsef had spent $50,000 on top of the 64,000 which had been stolen from him .
I prepared complaints for the police and for the registrar of companies they can be found here Offences . The evidence is available on request but due to the bulk of the evidence I have not placed it on the web site .
Neither the police nor registrar of companies would act because the matter is before the court , the fact that it is before the court under section 174 of the companies act appears to be beside the point and the many serious imprison-able offences are on the back burner probably awaiting the statute of limitations to pass .
Because I appear to be the only person who has focused on the criminal aspect Malcolm has had it in for me.
I have reported his actions and those of his son to the police many times and I think they are up to warning 4 .
Just a few weeks ago Malcolm sought to cast aspersions on me with a business group that I belong to , I responded by sending an open letter to his wife Debbie whose actions facilitated this whole mess right at the beginning.
Now Malcolm has threatened legal action alleging defamation . It is therefore appropriate for me to respond in terms of section 25 of the defamation act
the following are the statements which Malcolm alleges to be defamatory . Truth and honest opinion are never defamatory , truth may be inconvenient but in the end we are all accountable to the truth
I have for each statement produced the evidence which I rely on
The only equity in the business was the funds which Jozsef introduced. Truth the evidence is the 2014 accounts . as can be seen by the end of 2014 the only equity in the company was Jozsef’s funds , Samuel actually had a deficit .
In my professional opinion and based on the evidence I have collated I am of the opinion that all three of you should be locked up for defrauding Jozsef.
Honest opinion based on 15 years policing experience and 13 years as a private investigator see the offences as shown above
Samuel is still driving the BMW which he purchased using the money which he made out of Muse on allen and he has now transferred the ownership to Catering limited.
Truth I will supply the registration documents and the ppsr’s. they can be found here as shown to Muse on Allen here BMW and transferred to catering co Here bmw-1muse1 note also the number plate change but the chassis no etc are the same good to see that a young man who has just put a company into liquidation can afford a personalised plate the regos are.
The three of you have defrauded Jozsef , you have allowed Muse on Allen to be run into the ground and have left a trail of debts.
Honest opinion based on 15 years policing experience and 13 years as a private investigator offences and the credit report of Muse . here muse-on-allen-credit-check not the defaults and also the fact that the company is now in liquidation see here
Throughout this time and to this date you have stood by and allowed your son and husband to bully and abuse both Jozsef and myself.
Truth the police have warned him at least three times you have apparently done nothing but duck for cover
I have communicated my concerns about Malcolm’s behaviour to the ministry of social development I do not believe that persons who practices this level of bullying that in his private life , does not display those same qualities at work .
Honest opinion the degree of bullying which we have suffered is unbelievable there are many emails in which they have made the most cruel remarks to me , I am totally fed up with their bullying behaviour
Often what is not objected to proves more than you realise. In this case Malcolm North by not claiming these statements to be defamatory admits to them as fact
1. I am writing to you in the hope that we may be able to sort out the bullying which I have been suffering at the hands of you husband and son.
2.Jozsef and Sam were the only directors when the company was formed. You were to be an alternate director for Samuel and you completed your own forms and backdated your directorship to day one . If you were to ask any one at the companies office they would tell you that this is not a lawful way to do things as you cannot appoint yourself director
3.With your son You then appointed Malcolm your husband to be a further director then all three of you went home and passed a resolution to remove Jozsef as director
4.As a director of the company you allowed Samuel to transfer all of Jozsefs shares into his own name without any legal basis and without the introduction of further equity into the company .
5.Through out this time and to this date you have stood by and allowed your son and husband to bully and abuse both Jozsef and myself.
6. we have made complaints to the police under the harmful digital communications act and despite the fact that they have been warned a number of time the abuse has continued
7. Last Year Malcolm made a complaint against my private investigators licence , there was no substance in his complaint
8. His vexatious complaints had me under investigation for some 10 months
9 Now he is sending emails to people associated with my business
10 If the police did their job and were not busy dealing with traffic the three of you would beheld fully answerable to the law .
11.I realize that attack is the best form of defence and that is exactly the only defence which your son and husband have
12.Debbie how about some integrity you work for counselors how about getting some counselign for your boys so that they can see that what they are doing is pure bullying and totally un ethical.
This is an open letter to Debbie North Wife of Malcolm North mother of Samuel North
Debbie I am writing to you in the hope that we may be able to sort out the bullying which I have been suffering at the hands of you husband and son.
I find it quite Ironic that you work for “The New Zealand Association of Counsellors “ and are listed as Debbie North firstname.lastname@example.org on their web site
In 2012 Samuel opened a restaurant Muse on Allen with Jozsef Szekely
Jozsef put in $64,000 and became a 70 % share holder due to the fact that the business had been purchased for $90,000 .
The only equity in the business was the funds which Jozsef introduced.
Jozsef and Sam were the only directors when the company was formed. You were to be an alternate director for Samuel and you completed your own forms and backdated your directorship to day one . If yo were to ask any one at the companies office they would tell you that this is not a lawful way to do things as you cannot appoint yourself director.
With your son You then appointed Malcolm your husband to be a further director then all three of you went home and passed a resolution to remove Jozsef as director .
As a director of the company you allowed Samuel to transfer all of Jozsefs shares into his own name without any legal basis and without the introduction of further equity into the company .
Court action followed and you eventually resigned as director in November 2014
Through out this time and to this date you have stood by and allowed your son and husband to bully and abuse both Jozsef and myself.
we have made complaints to the police under the harmful digital communications act and despite the fact that they have been warned a number of time the abuse has continued
Last Year Malcolm made a complaint against my private investigators licence , there was no substance in his complaint and the authority reported
His vexatious complaints had me under investigation for some 10 months
Now he is sending emails to people associated with my business
Hello I warned you before Is this the type of person you want in your chapter
Debbie I have had enough of this .
the three of you have defrauded Jozsef , you have allowed Muse on Allen to be run into the ground and have left a trail of debts.
Samuel is still driving the BMW which he purchased using the money which he made out of Muse on Allen and he has now transferred the ownership to Catering limited.
If the police did their job and were not busy dealing with traffic the three of you would beheld fully answerable to the law .
In my professional opinion and based on the evidence I have collated I am of the opinion that all three of you should be locked up for defrauding Jozsef.
I realize that attack is the best form of defence and that is exactly the only defence which your son and husband have
Debbie how about some integrity you work for counselors how about getting some counselign for your boys so that they can see that what they are doing is pure bullying and totally un ethical.
I have communicated my concerns about Malcolm’s behavior to the ministry of social development I do not believe that persons who practices this level of bullying that in his private life , does not display those same qualities at work .
PLEASE HELP STAMP OUT BULLYING AND FRAUD .
Muse Eatery is it or is it not connected to Muse on Allen ?or what does this say about Samuel Norths integrity ?
Let us play a game of Truth or lies We won’t tell you which is which But lets just look at the facts the following are statements made in the news item highlighted above click here for the article
“The former Muse on Allen restaurant has been put into liquidation”. see the answer here well that was straight forward enough but now lets try this one
Owner Samuel North says it is not connected to his new business, Muse Eatery and Bar, on Victoria St.
Lets look at the web page for Muse eatery lets look at the about page
do you see what I see ?
But in the article Samuel North claims are reported as
His current business Muse Eatery & Bar on Victoria St was not connected to the liquidated business, he said.
It was owned by Catering Limited, of which he is the sole director.
Catering limited was incorporated 03 Dec 2015 so How could Muse eatery , owned by Catering limited have won the above awards the news items clearly show that these awards were for Muse on Allen?
Samuel was indeed very fortunate to have Sarah Meikle as a friend see here read more about her here Five Minutes with Visa Wellington On a Plate director Sarah Meikle.
the trip advisor reviews https://www.facebook.com/MuseEateryBar/app/254084314702229/ are coincidentally all those of Muse on Allen see here
I particularly love the way that in the midst of the article which claims that “Muse Eatery & Bar on Victoria St was not connected to the liquidated business”( muse on allen ) there are several links being
notable quotes are
“Muse On Allen restaurant has been at the address for three and a half years, but will reopen at 56 Victoria St, formerly home to 3C Bar and Restaurant.”
“When the restaurant reopens in the first week of March, it’ll be serving lunch for the first time in addition to dinner, with plans for a breakfast service, too.”
Muse’s new look
Muse’s success continues
Muse has been open for a month at its new Victoria St premises
Now is a good time now to visit Facebook the link is found at the bottom of the Muse eatery web site https://www.facebook.com/MuseEateryBar/ keep scrolling
7 April 2016
Muse On Allen restaurant has been at the address for three and a half years, but will reopen at 56 Victoria St, formerly home to 3C Bar and Restaurant.
Muse owner and director Samuel North says the new space offers the restaurant a chance to expand its services.
Since opening the fine dining establishment as a 21-year-old, North has grown Muse into an award-winning success story.
When the restaurant reopens in the first week of March, it’ll be serving lunch for the first time in addition to dinner, with plans for a breakfast service, too.
Muse’s trademark purple decor will remain, as will its seven staff and favourite dishes such as the beef tartare, tuna sashimi, and creme brulee with doughnuts.
The high-ceilinged, bamboo-floored space in Victoria St is double the size of Muse’s original premises more
by the way notice anything about the Logos ?
now look at theat the bottom of this post you can see the domain names museonallen.co.nz is registered at the domain name registry and shows this full record saved for prosperity here “museonallen.co.nz” (Active) _ Domain Name Commission is recorded to Malcolm@museeatery.co.nz
museeatery.co.nz is the web site which Samuel Norths “new” restaurant uses
Samuel North uses the email address email@example.com his father Malcolm uses firstname.lastname@example.org
this is what happens when you look up muserestaurant.co.nz or see the preserved hard copy here “muserestaurant.co.nz” (Active) _ Domain Name Commission
Strangely enough the domain name was registered to Jozsef Szekely who happens to be the person who sank his life savings into Muse of Allen before being removed by Samuel, Malcolm and Debbie north as a director see here
Samuel then transferred all of Jozsefs shares into his own name in two steps here and here when no corresponding transaction had occurred in the actual company books and when Jozsef was the only person to have equity in the company see here this is why there was a court matter “After court North said his the debt stemmed from a legal battle he had with a business partner when Muse first opened” Jozsef basically took offence to being ripped off to the tune of $64,000. strange that the bill to IRD is about that size .. coincidence ?
we do hope that the liquidators look at the accounts closely we are not book keepers but the accounts for Muse on Allen certainly appear to have more than one issue.
we don’t know what you think but we are pretty certain that muse on Allen and Muse eatery are one and the same .
The reason that our company and trust structure is so well liked is because THERE IS NO DUE DILIGENCE DONE BY THE REGISTRARS OF NEW ZEALAND COMPANIES AND TRUSTS ARE NOT RECORDED.
Few realize that our trust and company structure is actually most abused through lawyers who in turn are protected by our courts .
I am a whistle blower on the corrupt use of trusts , I thought that in this country which at the time prided itself to be the least corrupt that I could say ” hey guess what the law enforcement agency The animal welfare institute of New Zealand does not exist at all ” what happened? lawyers got together sued me for a ridiculous sum tried to bankrupt me and tried to put my company out of business. they were protected by their own society and the judges who were once members of that very society.
I have come to realize that the biggest gang in town are the lawyers. Its like complaining about a gang member and then being told to speak to the gang leaders if you feel there is a problem . If it is some one they want to dispose of it will be useful to them but if the person is in the ” in crowd ” and their activities make the gang look bad then there is a huge cover up. I have even had instances where he judges have gone way out on a limb to silence the entire matter one of those instances was with regards to a well published Russian lawyer who was up to his neck in trust companies such as those refereed to in the panama papers.
Just recently I assisted a young man who had had all of his shares fraudulently transferred from him and into the name of his business partner the minority share holder .Effectively he had his business stolen from him . We managed to get a lawyer appointed for the company who was taking instructions from the very person who was involved in the theft of the shares. I told the lawyer for the company that he had a duty to be independent ie act for the company and to act according to the rules and could not condone the illegal activities of the company. The result :-the lawyer made false complaint alleging that I was in contempt of court and had committed blackmail when I wrote to him and pointed out this section of the law I was promptly taken to court for harassment In Wellington when I lived in Auckland . The date of the hearing was conveniently left off the papers I was served and the evidence is such that I am convinced that the court, the registrars and the lawyers all conspire together to ensure that lawyers make a healthy living and no one dares question their activities.
As a result I now have a legal bill.. yes their fees of over $6,000 . I have a solution I will be selling an e book exposing their tactics of winning and every cent that I raise will go settling this ” debt” if there is interest I will simply sell more copies . I suspect that with the publication of the panama papers this e book could be quite popular as the companies legislation abuse and the manner in which some law firms condone unlawful transactions is central to makign the company structure in NZ a mockery
New Zealand is far more corrupt than you can imagine.
any one wishing to receive a copy of the e book can pre order shortly
Hot off the press we have an article in the herald
the story comes from the international consortium of investigative journalists
they publish a video as below
You will note that the video mentions “MOSSACK FONSECA”
New Zealand appears to have its very own branch of this company see here
the share holder of this company is
3 Centaur Close, Albany, Auckland, 0632 , New Zealand
260 Victoria Avenue, Remuera, Auckland, 1050 , New Zealand
- DAVID LOVE LIMITED (3350190) – Shareholder
- MOSSACK FONSECA & CO. (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED (4852039) – Shareholder
There are 101 companies registered to the address of Bentley accountants see here many appear to be trust companies held on behalf of foreigners.
The Benley group of companies is not the only group involved in international trusts the journalists at naked capitalism identified NZ’s role in UnaEnergy Trustees Limited
Naked Capatalism raised the point that
New Zealand-based “foreign trusts” have been actively marketed overseas for benefits including their exemption from New Zealand tax on foreign sourced income, minimal compliance and reporting requirements, and no requirement for public disclosure of the beneficial owners.
As Transparency NZ has noted the apparent lack of requirement to comply with he companies act must also be a benefit s illustrated with the Muse on Allen Saga
more on Mossack Fonseca
Giant leak exposes global array of crime, corruption https://panamapapers.icij.org/
The transition is mainly due to the fact that the shareholding in Muse on Allen Limited was unlawfully obtained by Samuel North by simply accessing the the company register and transferring the shares to himself and again here the law is quite specific about this process but Samuel simply ignored the law and used a computer to unlawfully transfer the shares.
Samuel is quite aware of what he has done , there have been many admissions including repeatedly telling the court that the shares were transferred “in error’ despite the claim of ” error ” nothing has been done to correct it in 3 years and the accounts continue to show that Samuel has no equity in the company despite claiming to be the majority share holder
Muse eatery is now trying to get a liquor licence for the new premises at 56 VICTORIA STREET. the web site has been linked to the new domain name museeatery.co.nz which opens to the url http://museonallen.co.nz/.
The content of the web site is that of Muse on Allen and the content is the same Muse Eatery media.
Concrete evidence that the new company catering Limited has adopted the name Muse eatery is in the application for liquor licence Alcohol Application – Muse Restaurant, Ground Floor, 56 Victoria Street, Wellington Central which a number of persons have opposed .
so between the names Muse restaurant and Muse eatery the public are being asked to accept the new restaurant as a continuation of the old while Samuel North uses up the money from the sale to ensure that the person who put all his money in the restaurant is left totally out of pocket .
we can only appeal to the public that if they believe in fairness and honesty then they should give Muse Restaurant, Muse eatery& bar or what ever it is called this week , a wide berth .