Archive for November 2016

Suzie Dawson a blast from the past may she fare well in Russia

5-beecheIts a funny little world    and sometimes events which are long forgotten come back   and the planets align.

In august this year  my PI licence was up for renewal , I appeared  before the  ” authority ”  on a matter which should never have been accepted as a complaint let alone be investigated and  go as far as a  hearing.

Malcolm North had made a complaint under the code of conduct of Private investigators.  He did not like the fact that I was assisting, the person who I  believe is  victim of his crimes, in limiting damages .

There was   but one problem  there is  only one code of  conduct and that is with regards to  surveillance.

I was under investigations  by the DIA for  some 10 months   they  kept telling me that I was under investigation for breach of code of conduct.   and in the end they published a most defamatory report  which their spin doctors have defended  to the hilt to justify their investigations .

I was called before the PSPLA   and the ” authority ”  did  he only thing he could  do   and  dismissed the  complaint


While I was before this hearing, which actually did not have a valid complaint to hear , the Authority  Roger Gill   asked to speak to me off the record .  he did  so  and I recorded our conversation  for future reference .

I was told by him that  he did not consider me to be an appropriate person to hold a licence , I was told that I had to stop blogging and stop making complaints to the law society about lawyers or else I would not have a certificate of approval ( COE). I wrote to him and advised him of my rights under the bill of right  both to the freedom of expression and freedom to form and hold opinions.

My COE  was supposed to  renew on the 16th  August.  On the 12th  august  I received a  registered mail item, it was  an on the papers decision on my application.  It had been declined.

There were a number of  historic items listed   mainly  hearsay and   unsupported by real evidence  , others were items which  I should have had a right  of explanation  on. One was


ThI must admit this one had me thinking

There was never a  Restraining order  but I  did  get a trespass  notice after I had served papers   at 5 Beech place   a notice to   remove defamatory material from  a web site .

until this week it never clicked   and then   I saw  a most interesting  item on face book  a link which led to  this



WELL  is this   ever an exercise in self promotion / sensationalism , I was most interested to read the words on her scoop post 

The targeting of Ms Dawson led to serious threats against and endangerment of her life and those of her children.

suddenly I connected the two     and indeed in early 2013  I had had dealings  with one and the same Ms Dawson  when  she published defamatory and  blatantly incorrect  material about  me  and I simply asked her to remove it from her blogand when I was ignored served a notice  on her as required by the act.

I had phoned her  as first point of contact  and  her daughter had answered the phone  , I asked for Suzie Dawson and  when she got on the phone   she hurled a  barrage of abuse at me and a claim  that  I  was stalking her .

Eventually she did remove the material from her post    but it wold appear  that  she also made a false complaint that I was stalking her.

Knowing what I know  about Suzie Dawson   and having interacted with her , I do hope that she gets asylum in Russia  and may her  stay be a lengthy one.

I personally  would not  believe a thing she says  as to me ,on the evidence I have , I can conclude that  she  is  prone to  gross exaggeration and  paranoia .

She calls herself a journalist  but she is not one  .

If she is one of the 88 new Zealanders the government is looking at then the government is wasting tax payers  funds  ,  it is my opinion that she  does nothing more than regurgitates  information which she finds on the  web and publishes as her own .

Please don’t give her money  , in doing so you will be  supporting a potential fraud.  her web sites are  ,,,www.,,,, ,,,    redstar309z,    

whil suzie Dawson claims to have done much she has infact done little.  evidence of  her blog is here   sh sertainly would not be on the most wanted list  and if she has suffered anything it wouldin my opinion be paranoia .

a clue to what she is up to is here 

Since joining the Occupy Auckland media team in 2011, Suzie Dawson has been a driving force behind many social justice and political movement media campaigns and events, including #GCSB, #NZ4Gaza and #TPPANoWay. Her work has been shared internationally including by, Wikileaks and Business Insider. She is currently traveling the world and writing about her experiences.

The reality is that Occupy Auckland is done and dusted.. Suzie is a self appointed journalist  and is funding  her overseas  travels by blogging and turning herself into  an international person of interest. It would appear that she has sold her Beeche place    home. The fact that she sold then   traveled the  globe gives more clarity to the statement

Kiwi journalist and activist Suzie Dawson has been extensively targeted by Western intelligence agencies and their contractors. In the wake of several overt attempts on her life, she had to leave her home in New Zealand to live in exile in Europe

Now Suzie  which is it  did you sell up and  go on a trip  or  were you forced to leave .. at least  you should be consistent in what you post  .. hope you are enjoying your cool million  please dont ask people to fund your holiday  its not ethical 5-beeche-price



Abuse of Harassment action ..attack the best form of defence for would be crims

lauda-finemToday was supposed to be a day in the garden but this morning a friend sent me a link to lauda Finem

I have  had to have  a giggle over the article  as it parallels what is going on in my life .. believe me though it is no  laughing matter   its probably more of a Yeh   Im not the only one on to it  giggle

in 2006 I discovered that  the animal welfare institute of New Zealand ( awinz).. an approved organisation   under the animal welfare act with  coercive search  and seizure powers..   did not exist.  I was taken to court for  defamation ..denied a defence of truth and honest opinion . they attacked my marriage  my family and spat me out the other end. All in the name of concealment of corruption

Next up were the directors  of fresh prepared , represented   by Peter Spring of Keegan Alexander   .. these news  items    speak volumes Boss invents accountant to escape $60k debt and Charges over alleged fake liquidator    Yes I had discovered the  lack of existence of the  director  l and the  liquidator.. this made me a threat to society   and  was taken to court for  harassment , I had not done anything  but they came up with things like   ..last night the bosses truck was broken into  we thought it was her , then we found  it wasn’t.

I took on a human rights lawyer  .He stripped me of serious cash   then took  me to court for harassment  because of what I knew . , I had not even breathed  a word but he feared  what he thought I knew  .. yes  the equivalent of the panama papers  but three years earlier  . It is no surprise that  now has a Panamanian address and is no longer a lawyer in NZ .

The court has sorted that one out  with its invisibility cloak .. I am not allowed to use his name and     looking back I am  not sure who he was  working for it certainly was not  for me

Next  Neil Wells  the man behind AWINZ  succeeded in getting my  company liquidated, he did this by using   translegal  to  not served papers on me , so I was blissfully unaware of the action until it was too late.  I caught the document server out  and the liquidation was reversed. A lady contacted me  and they were trying to take one of her children away from  her they were the   the  parents of the sperm donor ( now deceased ) they decided that they wanted the  child   so the  proceedings were commenced  using a trans legal  document server , who had 30 previous convictions for dishonesty  and is still in the business.   She did not get an apology  I did  at the direction of hte court  they were supposed to put it on their web page   but    took it down  in a flash   here is the translegal-apology

The next to sue me for harassment  was another lawyer   one who was  representing Muse on Allen.. of the law firm Johnston Lawrence Limited  , I made the fatal mistake of  telling him that he should  act according to the rule of law and not  support criminal action  .  The directors of muse on Allen   Malcolm North , Debbie north and Samuel North ,  had transferred shares representing  a young mans total investment in a company  into the name of Samuel north   they called this an  “error ” I pointed out that after  three years ” errors” can no longer be called ” errors “if they are acknowledged and not  corrected. .. that  worth taking harassment action over.. guess it prevents a claim of using your office to facilitate fraud.   the lawyer had himself removed from the court action in a  confidential  application to the court  .

The strategy which was played out  was very  clever  and  by introducing  un substantiated  allegations of defamation at the 11th hour, filed    and bypassing me for  any comment . Playing this game  they got a restraining order when I missed the court date as they had conveniently not served that document  on me   and had  at the last minute lulled me into believing that  an undertaking would  suffice .

When I had the judgement  recalled , the  directors of the law firm Johnston Lawrence Limited   went out of their way to misdirect the court . fortunately the law society are looking into their action .  Defamtion  has a statute of its own  and  defamation has to be pleaded , it cant be alleged.   there is a defence of truth  and honest opinion for defamation , but when you are denied that right of  defence  it leaves you sadly lacking  and  fiction becomes fact  e.g.  a non existent animal welfare institute of New Zealand becomes  the emperors new clothes.

The next one  who has been threatening defamation action is the man who does not know how to stop harassing ;-Malcolm North   who is up to his neck in what  I have proved to be  is   dubious company activity  ( truth )  having    defrauded a young man from  some $64,000  so that his own  son can claim to be the youngest top chef and set up a restaurant without any funds  except those   he ” acquired ” through   the unlawful stroke of a pen .

Malcolm North  is particularly keen that I tell the world that   My  Private investigators certificate was not renewed.   Well  why should I when  this has been over turned on appeal , he is now  seeking advice from the PSPLA  on how to object once again , he is beavering  away in the back ground  spying on me   and  looking at  all possible ways  to discredit me and   cost me income .

This is where today’s   item was very timely  not only does it mention  the use of the court by the corrupt  but it shows the failings of a PI registration  system .

I am, apparently, in the opinion of the ” authority ”  not a suitable person to be a PI  because the ” authority’  did not like me  blogging   or making complaints about lawyers .. I have  the voice recording for any one who wants to confirm this … he ( Roger Gill )  told me in an unofficial meeting  that unless I stop  blogging and making complaints about lawyers that  I  would not get a   certificate  of approval .  I felt that that was a tad blackmailish  and have a firm belief in the right  to hold an opinion and for the  freedom of expression .

So it came as a bit of a surprise to see that Danny Thompson has got his approval through  despite  not having declared previous convictions , I am also aware of others with convictions  who  hold  PI  Licences of COE’s including Gary Swan  who was exonerated   for   facilitating false affidavits of service but because I speak up  against corruption I am a danger to society

the reasons  for declinature.. for which the authority dug   deep were

  1. the allegation that I was warned for blackmail by the police ..  this was not  the case and the  PSPLA actually  had no documents at all   to support this allegation.
  2. I had allegedly stalked  a   woman and her daughter, this was conveniently an anonymous complaint and even thought it allegedly occurred in 2012   was never investigated  it was enough to count against me .. I have a rough idea  who the  vindictive bitch was
  3. then   a matter  which the Pspla had already sat on and  dismissed was  reconsidered  and counted for 2  matters  the fact that the  woman involved,  one Parrisa Hamedi    was living in a housing corp house in Nelson while claiming to be in a defacto relationship  in Auckland   is beside  the point;-  the object of the exercise was to claim as many assets with as few possible bonks.  The lawyer involved Steven Zindel   took her claim to court   just when  the  victim was getting married  .There was no evidence of   defacto relationship , she was still living  with her children and  ex husband and collecting $$$$  from our government and used legal aid to  try and facilitate what I consider  to be a fraud. . Both Zindel and Parisa Hamedi took me to the Pspla  because I told him that  Zindel had an obligation to  ensure that   he did not use the court for an attempted fraud  and  I also provided evidence that there was no  defacto relationship .  I came to  this conclusion four years before the court came to the same conclusion but on the plus side many  lawyers including Zindel  made a few bob on the way  all courtesy of the  tax payer .
  4.  then last but not least   the Johnson Lawrence matter was hurled in my face.

I have to add that on each of the above allegations I was not given a chance to  comment   and it was a  Fait Accompli as far as the authority was concerned

In the appeal papers the PSPLA  had included yet another matter   one of  Dr Gerald Waters  who had complained about my action  You can read all about him here   yes another crim using the court to fight back

So what it all comes down to  is that the court is being used as a weapon of choice to conceal  fraud corruption and crime , it is a tool used by the corrupt ;Tar  the person who is most likely  to expose you  and you  could get away Scott free.

All I have ever wished for  is for half as much investigation to have gone into  AWINZ and Muse on Allen as has gone into me  for standing by the victims of crime .  This can only  lead me to believe that  our society   supports corruption

The private security licencing authority is of the opinion that I believe in some sort of conspiracy  ( his words not mine ) . The reality is  that when you  look for coruppion you find it very easily  because there is so much of it. the only way to  not see it is to walk about with your eyes closed or  be part of the problem

Well  when I read  Lauda Finem and this latest matter    I don’t have to think that there is some   sort of corruption lurking in the justice system;  I know there   is . I have spoken to  people whose  properties have been stolen from them  by  Lawyers who ensured that documents  conveniently went missing from  files . they are trusted  and believable  and  officers of the court .. they would not do that….or would they  ?????

Its like magic   if  you believe something has integrity then you  wont think it can happen… but   its all sleight of hand and concealment and integrity that isn’t actually there

Blogs take the magic away that is why we must be stopped. While ” they”  control the news  , they cant control us . yesterday I heard on the news that we must not believe  what is in blogs .. well I’m not certain  if  we should  actually believe the news either

No one will take away my right to blog  I do so pursuant to my rights under the bill of rights.  I   report the truth     which apparently is frowned upon.  I wonder why  ?

Malcolm North takes a break from Bankruptcy court to do more harassing

muse-owes-160000This week has been a big week  for Malcolm North  He appeared in the Wellington High court  bankruptcy court.  He has  apparently come home to have another go at me, I am becoming very tired of his  bullying behaviour   and  find the only way to deal with him  is through this site

I have responded in Red

From: malcolm north []
Sent: Thursday, 10 November 2016 6:06 p.m.
To: ‘Grace’
Subject: Defamatory Information.

Hello Grace.

I have requested you before to remove the defamatory information from your website and so far you have not done this I don’t have a problem with factual information so can you either remove it or amend it.

Malcolm I have responded to you and  advised you that truth is never  defamatory. I responded  on 30 September , if you care to look at the act you will note that you are grossly out of  time   however  with respect  to the following I will address them 

  • I am not a Business Development Manager with Ministry of Social Development. Not true.

the words used  were ”   I believe”  I may have  got that wrong looking at your earlier emails which were sent  from your business email you  the following   so   perhaps you still hold that position 

 Malcolm North
Employment Broker
Job Connect.
Phone: 0800-778-008  DDI 049137535

  • Debbie had no input into setting up the business ( please provide evidence that she did )

Please refer to the companies  register  on the 17th August she   completed and  uploaded her own directors documents  back dating them to the date the company was formed  Director Consent 

apparently it is an offence under the companies act to do that   and also there are no resolutions which allow her to even be appointed as director  but then that  has never made any difference .

Even when she worked for the Dental council she allegedly managed to get a dentist removed from the roll without  following process . 

  • The matter has been before the courts for 4 years not 2 years. Not true.

sorry I erred on the side of caution .. how is that defamatory ? 

  • The Police have advised on 2 occasions  not 4 that we should refrain from emailing you .Not true

It would appear that  it doesn’t matter how many time you get told you keep on emailing.. this is harassment 

  • You are correct that Joszef contributed $65,000 towards setting up the business but you have failed to supply evidence where the balance of the purchase price and further capital came from .If you read the 2012 /2013 you will see a further $79,147 was introduced please provide evidence that this is not the case.

The 2013 and 2014 annual  accounts  show no  introduction of equity annual accounts  It shows  loans which is an introduction of debt  and  Samuel actually took out  more money in the business than he had invested. 

It appears to me that you do not grasp the concept of equity and loans 

  • Please provide evidence that we have defrauded Joszef because we have not seen any.

OK   I will explain this S L O W L Y    You and Debbie were directors of the company with Samuel Director Consent      Director Consent Form      Director Consent

You went home to your flat and without giving the proper notice had a cozy meeting  and  threw Jozsef out  Particulars of Director  the resolution you passed  is here directors-resolution-dated-10-january-2013  note that it is signed by Debbie  

Debbie and  Samuel  were directors when  Jozsefs majority share holding was reduced through no  legal means for the shares to be transferred from  Jozsef to samuel   when there was no paperwork or transactions to  facilitate that Shareholder Consent Form   transferred shares  here  to 49%   and then when you were director took all his shares Here . In my experience  and  my opinion it  is fraudulent   to claim shares which have not been legally transferred  and the person  owning them  has not received compensation  or  consented to the the transfer  .  

As directors of the company you had a legal obligation   to oversee the share register  and in my  humble opinion ,  by allowing this to continue  you became parties to the offence as well as committing offences under the companies  act 

You then   represented the company in court proceedings and passed yourself off as  a lawyer  and  claimed that the shares were transferred in ” error”  but despite this   and over the period of  four years  you never made any attempts to correct the alleged  ” error ” 

  • You are correct about the ownership of the BMW can you please provide evidence that this was paid for from Muse on Allen funds.

The ownership of the vehicle   shows that  it was owned by Muse on Allen , there was a security  interest agaisnt it  in the name of Muse on allen 

the vehicle was then transfered to  the ownership of Catering  Limited   and the PPSR remained with Muse on allen  but changed some months later   .

the registration of the BMW is now 1 Muse 1 

  • We have seen no evidence of bullying yourself and Joszef by myself and Samuel can you please provide this.

It is sad that you do not know what bullying is,   the  many horrible emails which you have sent   the personal comments the below the belt  statements   are privately recorded , only the police have copies of them , they were sufficient for them to warn you a number of times 

  • Your concerns to my employers have been thoroughly investigated and no action has been taken against me.

Time will tell  

  • Could you please provide evidence that Muse on Allen was run into the ground.

Where do I begin 

The company is in liquidation 

It owes $160,000  see here 

I could go on but it  would be boring 

I am receiving calls at my employment about your behaviour in the Hawkes Bay so contrary to what you might think the publicity you are giving me is probably not in your favour.

Now that would be boring    why would any one want to  call you   about me  ,   But I guess that would  be the same  way as people phoning me  about the three of you  

but don’t you  think that the statement you have just made is not bullying  ??????   I think it is  

Trusting this is not seen as bullying  as it is not intended to be as it is only a opportunity for you to amend your postings before I  go to the expense to proceed with defamation proceedings against you.

Yes I do see it as bullying , I wont be amending anything  I   think that this  explanation should serve  any discerning reader  . Long live transparency  

Kind regards

Malcolm North