Recently I applied to join Transparency International ( again) the new Zealand branch of Transparency International appears to be at odds with the rest of the movement and I have again been rejected .
Today I signed the THE DECLARATION AGAINST CORRUPTION
I found the declaration after visiting the Unmask the corrupt pages by Transparency international .
It would appear that internationally we are exposing corruption but Transparency International New Zealand feels uncomfortable even with acknowledging that there is such a thing as corruption in New Zealand.
The events of last week have driven it home to me just how corrupt we are and how unseen cowards can pull strings in the background to ensure that whistle blowers are dealt to .
A small Probono job in 2006 saw my life change and 11 years later I am still suffering the fall out, that is because I stumbled on corruption which is being actively concealed by the National government and the last Labour government .
The man involved is a labour man an animal welfare lawyer who wrote legislation for his own business plan, advised on it as independent adviser to the select committee and made what I know to be , a fraudulent application to the crown for law enforcement for a fictional organisation which in reality was just him.
He ran his “ approved organisation “ from Waitakere city council premises where he was manager . He used the staff, infrastructure and vehicles to run his operation and re branded the building to give it the same appearance as the fictional “ organisation” 
which had the extensive law enforcement powers of search seizure and prosecution.
The logo top right was that of his fictional organisation the buildings are the dog Pound at the then Waitakere city council where he was the manager.
When I asked questions of council and MAF I was sued by him for defamation , I was denied the statutory defence of truth and honest opinion for stating that the trust AWINZ could not have made an application in 1999 as it did not exist at that time and was only created in 2006 to effect a cover up to conceal this in court .
IN 2007 he wrote to MAF expressing his intention to bankrupt me
He had about a dozen attempts at bankruptcy and even put my company into liquidation using a false affidavit . The liquidation was reversed ( by court order ) and I fought off bankruptcy. there were no concerns about my health and well being I was severely depressed dam near suicidal and the attacks kept coming . But as they say what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger so it woudl appear that this sick old man has come back for a second attack on me because he is so fearful that he will be found out .
Apparently standing up for your rights is being called litigious . But guess that sounds better than saying I fought for .. justice . which is a silly fight as I do not believe there is any in NZ.
Questioning the lack of existence of AWINZ has devastated my life and torn my family apart. I moved to Napier thinking it was all over and hoped that one day the barrister would be found out.
Next thing my private investigators licence cames up for its 5yr renewal and is declined because the “authority” thinks that the opinion of a police woman, who spoke to me on the phone in 2012, matters and calls me a conspiracy theorist on that basis.
This is such an important issue that when I appeal the declinature of my Private investigators licence it makes headlines in the news.
For my appeal I do some research , I see what penalty lawyers ( Officers of the court ) get for committing real offences as opposed to being judged on their perceived opinion . I find an article on the lawyers news site see here
I read it and from the information provided and my knowledge identify the lawyer
At last I saw him for what I know him to be and in a blog , exercising my right to freedom of expression and right to hold an opinion. I expressed my opinion as to the identity of this person.
I am aware that suppression in the lawyers and conveyancers act is given by not releasing his name , hence he was called mr M I was not part of the process and did not know that he had been before the tribunal I just knew of the circumstances outlined in the news item, in fact I had known since 2006 that he was attempting to get his hands on the funds of this dear old lady and even had correspondence relating to this.
Two weeks after my publication I was charged , No one has been able to provide me with a “ order “ for suppression and the police charge is ambiguous using wording for one alleged offence and the statutory basis of another .
I was provided with an almost totally redacted document when the full version is publicly available on line .
I did note that Fear appears to be plaguing Mr M states at 26 the practitioner has in the past been pursued by a litigious and irrational person who might be expected to re-engage in a campaign against the practitioner should the present matters come to that person’s attention. And then puts the boot in stating “[27] The litigation pursued by this person has been the subject of adverse judicial comment at all levels.”( yes prompted by his lawyers who never checked the facts and were good at attacking character but lousy at identifying facts ) see Is the AWINZ Charity complicit in fraud on the courts ?
So again I am made out to be this less than desirable person and despite the fact that this lawyer has now committed what appears to be a criminal act he gets his identity withheld and Is not charged with his serious offences .
I go to court the press is there and next day my name age and the fact that I have been charged appears in the local paper, nationally on line and nationally on the radio . Do you spot the irony here I do . I thought you were innocent until proved guilty .
If the prosecution guide lines had been followed for me then I would not have been charged . But it is so very important to charge me and publicly execute me before The trial , while Mr M comes out unidentifiable and unscathed.
I have to wonder Why am I so important and why do the various ministers that I have written to over the years not care about the use of public office for private gain by the man who got law enforcement powers for a fictional organisation.
Ministers have the ability to investigate , I have written to Amy Adams recently and over the years have written to half of cabinet. For some examples see 2014 Open letter to Mr Key – will you condone corruption? 2011Inability to question corruption in NZ – open letter to John Key
Do the ministers not understand what corruption is or are they condoning it
Corruption destroys lives it has to be an election issue
You need only look at the news item regarding the censured lawyer and you will see that the Lawyers tribunal is effectively condoning theft by a person in a special relationship ( theft by failing to account ) they should have sent this matter to the police for criminal prosecution . If they can condone serious offences such as that why I am being persecuted for exercising my rights under the bill of rights.
If this is not “ evidence” of a corrupt society what is ? what are our standards ? Warped I would say .
Protect the lawyers crucify whistle blowers only means one thing.. there is a lot more corruption than they like to pretend.
Looking forward to having an investigation into AWINZ 11 years is long enough it is not going to go away
Leave a Reply