Search Results
How lawyers use the court to conceal corruption

We all know that there is no such thing as magic . Magic in my definition is to do something seemingly impossible
We are told that our justice system is robust and that there is fairness in our courts but what few realise is that the civil jurisdiction has far less constraints on it than the criminal jurisdiction .
Section 27 of the bill of rights “Every person has the right to the observance of the principles of natural justice by any tribunal or other public authority which has the power to make a determination in respect of that person’s rights, obligations, or interests protected or recognised by law.”
But only those charged with offences have “the right to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial court” section 25
For many lawyers court action is war, and as you know all is fair in love and war .
I was once a police prosecutor and believed that they system we had was fair , perhaps that was because I was an honest cop and thought the same of my colleagues, but times change standards change and a wider perspective allows you to see the full picture .
when I found myself in the civil jurisdiction on a claim of defamation and passing off , I discovered that lawyers are simply able to make things up
This is the statement of claim ,I was not allowed to defend it and the corrupt Barrister Neil Wells who was behind this public fraud swore it as true
The statement of claim was originally drafted by a law clerk , the charitable dollar was used to prosecute it and it was all signed off by a former crown prosecutor, with a reputable name who had obviously not looked at the allegations and the evidence to support it see details at this link more background
Clues to our legitimacy to hold and have our name is on the front page of the intituling the first plaintiffs
NEIL EDWARD WELLS of Huia, Auckland, Council Officer and
Lecturer, WYN HOADLEY of Castor Bay, Auckland, Barrister and
GRAEME JOHN COUTTS of Avondale, Auckland, Recruitment
Consultant as trustees of the ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE OF
NEW ZEALAND, AN UNINCORPORATED CHARITABLE TRUST
the third defendant
ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE OF NEW ZEALAND, AN
INCORPORATED CHARITABLE TRUST having its registered office at , Epsom, Auckland
Only through incorporation does a group of persons become a body corporate , Wells was aware of this he provided the law society with copies of minutes in 2011 these stated it clearly “Registration as Charitable Trust and tax exempt status with IRD..AWINZ has not been registered under the Charitable Trusts Act to date, this needs to be organised. IRD approvals required.
this contrasts with the application he submitted to the minister in 1999 and the letter which he wrote in march 2000 when he gave the minister the assurance that he could not send a copy of the trust deed as it had been sent off for registration .
There was never a trust deed produced that showed all three people as a trust and evidence was later to be found that the trust deed which they did produce was a total fake , the people named on this trust had never met and had never passed a resolution and the trust by its own terms expired in 2003 and since there was no meeting there was no re appointment of trustees
But why should all this stand in the way of obtaining a incorporated name through court action All done by way deceiving the court and attacking my reputation and character .
All this was achieved without evidence, simply as perjurious statement of claim and bull doze a head as if all the crap is true lawyers don’t fact check those with the money can get anything past the post .
The major flaw in our legal system is that Judges believe lawyers .Like any good magic trick it all begins with distraction by planting ideas in your head until our courts start calling for evidence and for a lawyer to fact check the claims then there will be no justice
The court must not be a tool where by the corrupt can obtain what they want and neither should the court be complicit in this , when there are no safe guards and the court can re write history based on the verbal garbage a lawyer presents then there is something very wrong. Its not about winning at all costs its about upholding the rule of law and to facilitate the administration of justice in New Zealand something that many lawyers over look guess there are no $$$ in that so they help Goliath strip david of his pebbles and slingshot and say justice has been seen to have been done .. or any way lets pretend it has.
Why I am a danger to society….. I must not lift rugs
I am under attack , yes right left and center things are happening as if by magic , all these lightening strikes which occur near me are totally coincidental .. I think not …. but because I am suspicious of Lightening striking the same spot repeatedly I have been labeled a ” conspiracy theorist ” and on that basis the Private security Licencing authority has refused to renew my Pi certificate of approval. Roger Gill has repeatedly stated
“The applicant appears to hold very strong views on many matters and she is
adamant that there is some form of conspiracy afoot, but in the absence of any
evidence to support this theory it appears to boil down to a long-held obsession which can only harm her ability to carry out her duties as a private investigator in a rational and professional manner.”
It would appear that One Ron Mc Quilter of Paragon investigations, the president of the NZIPI is right behind it all .He is a competitor of mine but I honestly believe that he works on the shady side of the fence with such persons as Trevor Morley , Mike Campbell and Gary Swan .It appears to me that all had apparent fingers in the pie of making lightening strike on me at some time or another .Their actions have been quite acceptable apparently while on my part speaking the truth and exposing corruption is not acceptable.
Although Mc Quilter has expressed his views as to my suitability to the PSPLA he has never made a complaint and apparently preferring to communicate through the back door with the PSPLA and feeding docuemtns to him to get rid of the competition . Ron there are legal processes.. stick to them!
Since Ron thinks that he is better than me I have set him a challenge in my open letter to him bet he ignores it I think its too difficult for him in my opinion he only likes simple things like finding dirt on people and making life hell for them . Ron’s police career was never in NZ and from what I have been told was measured in months not years , and in traffic not real crime .
I served as a police officer for 15 years and left when my daughter was born , in those days the employment relations act was not law and I was transferred on to front line duties at 6 1/2 months pregnant as my boss did not think a that a pregnant police woman should attend court ( I was a prosecutor at the time ) I had also lost my promotion to senior sergeant because I refused to jump the 6 ft fences and do the physical fitness test due to my pregnancy .
I became a PI in 2003 and in 2006 did a very simple pro Bono job For Lyn Mac Donald the bird lady, which devastated my life by tearing my family apart .
Lyn asked me to locate the animal welfare institute of New Zealand (AWINZ) , it had statutory powers under section 120 of the animal welfare act making it equivalent to the RNZSPCA and having the same powers of search seizure and ability to impose fines.
Except AWINZ did not exist in any manner or form. Neil Wells the council manager , was a barrister ( he no longer is ) he had been heavily involved in the drafting of the animal welfare act and had tailored it to facilitate his own business plan.
When I asked Waitakere Council and The MPI ( then MAF ) for the trust deeds of this organisation they had purportedly contracted too, there was a flurry of activity , cover ups, withholding information and denials and finally I was taken to court by Wells for defamation.
Of course he had no show of winning as I had so much evidence I could sink a battle ship. so Next step we deny her a Defence . Without a defence of truth and honest opinion Defamation is not winnable . Judge gets to make her out to be an axe murderer and this decision get waved in her face for ever more .. even criminals have better rights to justice than I had.
I was surprised that my colleagues in the NZIPI and those in the certified fraud examiners who I turned to for help stood by and did nothing, they did not even offer to look at evidence I had .
I had documents from ministers which were redacted and obtained copies from council which were un redacted, what these revealed was gold e.g “It is not appropriate for you to approve a proposal which is contrary to law ”
I failed to get my complaints dealt with by the SFO and the police , the police said it was too serious for them the SFO said it was not serious enough. both groups of people had something in common, they all associated with Mc Quilter .
Suddenly I was thrown out of the Certified fraud examiners association .. never thought it was Mc Quilter but his letter to the PSPLA in December speaks volumes.
An identically named trust was formed by Wells and was switched for the fictional organisation, Classic Identity fraud.
Here is the evidence
a trust deed was signed 5 December 2006 see here ,
It claims to be the same trust as one established on 1.3.2000 see here or see the copy to MAF here ( why would they be different?) significantly the trust deed had never been seen by any one prior to late june 2006.
MAFS audit , a report which was withheld from me at Wells request for some three years and was only released after AWINZ ceased being an approved organisation identifies significant trust issues see here it states that the trustees only met four times , the first being allegedly on 4 june 2004. If you read the trust deed then you will note that the term of appointment of trustees is only three years.
There is evidence that the trustees never met , never held a bank account and never passed a resolution .. so how did they manage to apply for approved status three months prior to the date of the deed and how could they have committed to the the functions of the approved organisation and its obligations to accountability and transparency .
How were they able to be a “trust ” and how could they commence court proceedings when the trustees had changed without any legal means of appointment or commitment to a trust let alone an approved organisation which had public law enforcement functions.
this new group became a charity and assumed the identity of the earlier fictional trusts How is this transparent and legally defensible ?
The people involved were Wyn Hoadley , Graeme Coutts JP , Tom Didovich and Neil Wells , supported by brookfields law firm , David Neutze and former lawyer Nick Wright and former wife
No one checked the facts , the dates the applications, a two year old can tell you that there is no integrity in what they claim but detail apparently does not matter when you have the right people on board.
A true colleague of mine told me many years later that one of the parties had told him that they were doing everything they would ” deal to me ”
The connection of these parties, the location the involvement of other have been sufficient for me to believe that Ron Mc quilter is in this up to his neck . His business partner at the time was Bryan Mogridge who was also trustee of enterprise Waitakere and also a trustee of the committee for Auckland.
2008 I was the secretary of the NZIPI the new Zealand institute of professional Investigators , Trevor Morley was the President .There were two people in the institute who he wanted to get rid of as members, but hey were unable to remove them for any breach of ethics. So Morley decided to change the rules so that we could effectively kick these persons out , some three years after the alleged incident . I felt that it was unethical to change the rules to remove some one and left the society . Today most former police officer PI’s who have integrity choose not to belong to the NZIPI . Trevor Morley has been in contact with Malcolm North as shown in this email
So by expressing the fact that I did not think that the NZIPI was particularly ethical I became an enemy of the state yet again . I later caught vice president Mike Campbell spreading rumours about me that I was about to be arrested .
Transpired that that Ron was putting together a blackmail complaint with regards to me relating to the Elizabeth Knox home . I remember speaking to a cop on the phone in 2012 and it turns out that on the basis of the emails that Mc Quilter gave her she decided that I should be warned for black mail except no one told me . I have no idea what those emails were and if they were even from me or were doctored. The police woman who had elaborate opinions of me yet had never met me claimed that she had warned me by phone , well she never did . see the article here
Strange things happened during 2012 , at about the same time as the allegation of blackmail my company went into liquidation, the company which did not serve papers on me and filed a false affidavit was Translegal services . fortunately the court reversed the bankruptcy .
There was also a strange coincidence that Graeme Coutts had an office on the same floor as the RNZSPCA and a very short distance from Translegal owned by another NZIPI member and occupying the same building as the ex husband of our former accountant Heather Whittle .
Heather Whittle had a few years earlier told my husband fairy stories , I knew they were lies these all led to my marriage breaking down in 2008 , the other person telling almost identical stories was the man across the road, two seemingly unconnected persons both used as tools to break up the marriage.
I was also warned by Maf for allegedly posing as a Maf officer when I had informed them that a company was using dodgy import credentials, these people took me to court for harassment and ensured that I was inundated with Chinese callers see story here
AND so things inter twine and a whole group of PI’s apparently working together have been aiming at getting me out of the industry. Yes I am a threat I expose the corruption which I believe that some PI’s are actively concealing.
It is humorous to think that the non service of court documents is not enough to put a PI ‘s licence at risk. Lawyers can have drugs and be censured and have their names suppressed , But for speaking the truth and exposing corruption I have to face the music , threatened with loss of income and have news articles such as this written about me .
The matter is now in the hands of the privacy commissioner. The press totally defends their actions and yes I happen to think that if lightening repeatedly strikes then there is a theory as to why. some people would think that that is a conspiracy.
It proves that there is much in NZ which is off the rails . I say it is corruption that is starting to show from under the Rug .
New Zealand , how we facilitate sham trusts
This post is prompted by the Editorial: NZ needs to assure world of trust scrutiny.
It is one which I will forward along with other blogs to international agencies who may wish to question how one of the worlds least corrupt countries can make this claim and I wish to reveal how trusts work in New Zealand
In 2006 I questioned the lack of existence of trust , this trust just happened to be one of two private law enforcement agencies, this trust the animal welfare institute of New Zealand (AWINZ ) taught me all you need to know about NZ trusts and how loosely they operate
AWINZ operated as an equivalent to the RNZSPCA and enforced animal welfare law , It had powers of search and the ability to seize some ones prized pet .
I was asked the simple question , who is AWINZ ? when I discovered that it was nothing but a sham and questioned the existence of a sham trust being a law enforcement authority I was immediately sued, denied a defence and was told to pay some $100,000 dollars to the person who wrote the animal welfare bill and was independent adviser to the select committee in the process of making his business plan , law .
He then made an application , which in my days as a police officer would have been considered fraud . ( this is due to the fact that the claim that AWINZ was a trust was totally false the application made 22 November 1999 predated he formation of any organisation by that name the earliest trust deed and one which Mr Wells relies upon was dated 1.3.2000 and even those persons never met or passed a resolution )
I have for years been beaten up for blowing this whistle. Below I have a list of links of how I have beaten my head against a brick wall for many years but for now I will reveal how New Zealand trusts work
- You need a trust deed .. it doesn’t matter when you sign it or who signs it as long as there is a deed a bit of paper which looks convincing.
- you can have various copies of the deed they can all conflict and no one cares see here and here
- no one enforces the deed, no one cares if the so called trust complies with its deed
- If you want a new deed you simply write a new one and refer to an earlier deed which may or may not have existed , Ird does not care I rather suspect that most people at IRD are number crunchers and done understand the legalities of dates names and real persons being involved in a trust .
- there is more information on the deed with regards to the identity of the witnesses than with regards to the the trustees. you can use generic names and who could ever identify the trustees
- if a trust does not meet or hold any assets or pass any resolutions it is still considered a trust and its identity can be used to interchange with any other trust ( real or fictional )
- the charities commission are happy to grant charity status to anything whihc meets their criteria , the fact that there are no resolutions for the trust and big gaping holes in their existence is but a technicality
Let me explain in terms of the AWINZ trust
As stated earlier Neil Wells a barrister at the time made an application for law enforcement powers for AWINZ he claimed on 22 November 1999 that a trust had been formed
No executed trust deed existed and these people had not formally met together or passed any resolution
Maf and The dog control section of Waitakere council had signed agreements with the representative of AWINZ:- Neil Wells
in 2006 Neither MAF nor Waitakere city council had a trust deed or had seen one : basically no one had checked the existence of AWINZ
when I proved that AWINZ did not exist ( charitable trusts need to be registered ) a trust deed materialized dated 1.3.2000 whihc brings about the question how can you make an application before a trust is formed. ?
I was to get evidence that these people had never met never held any assets , never passed a resolution.
By the terms of the deed the trust ceased to exist three years after it was formed, continuance depended on reappointment of trustees and since they never met no one was reappointed.
Wells sought charitable status in 2006 when new legislation came in. IRD rejected the trust deed so he simply wrote a new one and they claimed to be a continuation of the bogus 2000 trust
this was totally acceptable to the lawyers charity commission and MAF ( and later the government )
AWINZ was finally removed as approved Organisation in 2010 . the fictional law enforcemnt organisation operated for 10 years re branding council property and using the Council staff under Neil Wells control as AWINZ officers .
Neil wells still consults for government and makes submissions strange that he does not refer to the 10 years where he was the only person involved with AWINZ
this is how what I considered to be a fraud worked
I have brought it to the attention of the prime minister , Transparency International NZ , Auckland Council and again here , here , here, again here , here, here , here ,Auckland Mayor, the CEO of council , council lawyers and again here and here , here, here.
I have written to the lawyers involved and again here and here, here, here , the law society by way of regarding the lawyers , the charities commission and again here and here
Maf and now the ministry of primary Industries repeatedly fobbed me off and actively concealed the fraud, after all they never checked to see if the trust existed before supporting the application for law enforcement status , I was later to find that the current lawyer for Maf was involved int he process earlier on when he was working for crown law so I guess his own work came under scrutiny therefore concealment of the fraud was an act of self defence complaints to Maf Here , here, here , here, here,here, here, here and here
The people posing as trustees here, and here,here, here
attorney general here
I had questions asked in parliament Here wrote to ministers here and here
notable blogs of the past touching on the corruption which exist in New Zealand
NZ one of world’s least corrupt countries- its done with bogus trusts
Disparity in crime.. who you know matters
Approved and acceptable standards for document service in New Zealand
Questioning corruption in New Zealand.
Corruption in New Zealand – lack of support for whistleblowers
The perfect fraud – Public money for private gain
Liquidation as a tool of oppression
shooting the messenger
Why I am calling for an independent commission against corruption
Conclusion : Fraudulent trusts are condoned in New Zealand , I was silenced because I was exposing how slack our trust administration was .
more to come Court is used to silence exposure of abuse of overseas trusts