Will William Willis and Hannah Rawnsley get a penalty proportionate to mine.. I doubt it

IN 2006 I appeared before Mary Beth Sharp . I had asked questions of government regarding the lack of existence of one of two private law enforcement “organisations” , one was the RNZSPCA an incorporated society , the other the animal welfare institute of New Zealand ( AWINZ) had no legal existence at all .

Neil Wells a Barrister who has now been proven to be corrupt ,wrote the legislation for the animal welfare act and had advised on it as ” independent advisor to he select committee “

As posts on this web site prove, he ran it from council premises using council resources for private pecuniary gain.

With others we proved conclusively that AWINZ had no legal existence at all . We had incorporated the identical name and by being successful conclusively proved that his statements and allegations to the crown about the organisations legal existence in 2000 were manifestly false

There is a ton of evidence to show that they were aware of the lack of incorporation including a letter from the registrar of companies. The aim now was to force us to give up the name so that they could cover up the fraud .

Wells and Wyn Hoadley instructed a law clerk working from home and did not have a practicing certificate to resolve the matter , I have always wondered about the logic of this move.

The law clerk rang me late on the Friday night and made threats against my private investigators licence , and followed this up with threatening emails. When her threats and intimidation did not work she prepared a statement of claim which was prosecuted by Nick Wright who during the time he was prosecuting was a committed patient .CIV-2015-404-2800 [2017] NZHC 2865 par 4

Wells sued me for defamation for saying that AWINZ was a scam trust , the three people who claimed to be AWINZ even stated that they were an unincorporated trust, additionally they did not have any trust documents to support their standing .

They also sued for passing off we had formed our trust in April they first met in May , I still wonder how we could possibly pass ourselves off as a group of people who informally came together after we had incorporated and had no evidence of trading together .

These three people had never together been involved in the running of the ” approved organization ” evidence was withheld and over the years I have been able to obtain documents with help of the ombudsmen

The evidence is that the statement of claim was manifestly false that the former law clerk who is now a government lawyer is ding everything she can to have the posts censured , Truth is apparently not welcome and she claims it is damaging to her career .

Neil Wells swore the statement of claim as being true no other evidence was called for

I was prevented from having a defence of truth and honest opinion because Mary Beth Sharp had directed me to pay $19,000 to Wells and Co within two weeks and as a married woman at the time I had no independent wealth or access to that kind of money

This action caused me to lose everything in life , my family my marriage and well over $300,000 and 16 years on I am still fighting the fall out as the law clerk who prepared the statement of claim is suing me to conceal the truth.

The facts that I have published and the evidence is so overwhelming that we have to wonder if the government truly supports corruption , it is apparent that Judges look favorably on their own .

we will stand by for the wet dish rag slap which Willis and Rawnsley will suffer after all it is not nearly as bad as having a whistleblower on serious government corruption in our midst .

see also


Judge sends legal warning after reporters ask questions about Wānaka lockdown breachwww.stuff.co.nz

Judge exits horse business on day son revealed as Wānaka lockdown breaker | Stuff.co.nz

Leave a Reply