Archive for January 2013
The following is an email sent to Steve Hoadley,email@example.com after I had phoned him 22.01.2013 on ext 87031 (ph + 64 9 373 7599) and asked him to assist and mediate, he refused to speak to me .
the email reads
Stephen as a professor of human rights I am somewhat disappointed that you stand by and let WYN commit such atrocities on a fellow human being. If you condone this it appears somewhat Hypocritical to me.
She is supporting a breach of the united nations convention against corruption and if you were to take some time to look at the evidence you would see that she is not acting in any ethical or legal manner.
She has been using her standing and her perceived reputation to oppress me, she has torn my family apart, brought huge stress on me physical physiological and financial , liquidated my company on false evidence ( it was discovered and the company was reinstated ) , and is supporting the concealment of corruption.
None of this would have happened if she had checked the facts when she started with AWINZ or if AWINZ had actually existed instead of being a pseudonym for Neil Wells. I realise that she is now in it too deep and it is much easier to keep on the attack of me and hold on to that glimmer of hope that she can get away with it. Her incompetence and negligence is what has contributed to this and I hold her responsible for the part she has played in the concealment of corruption .
She is a public figure and I will ensure accountability of her , I may even have to resort to picketing outside your home and the TCDC but I will do it . 7 years of attack is too much this has to stop.
They are still after $70-80,000, what is the point of me working I don’t earn money like that I will have to sell the family home My crime has been to be a whistle blower on serious public corruption… do you also condone what has happened?
If you are concerned you would talk to me you would at least take time to listen but I now realise that this is how the so called elite keep themselves “ pure “ it is by refusing to talk and throwing up brick walls.
Thanks goodness for the internet. I will be posting this letter to you on Transparency.net.nz so that there is a public record of my plea for help to you .
The following is an article which has been forwarded to me by the father of a girl who was sexually abused her in New Zealand.
A very valid point is raised so I will publish the news item in the interest of transparency
In India this month, in the wake of a violent rape in Delhi, there are calls to suspend politicians accused of sex crimes1.
In the UK over the past few months, resulting from the fallout from the Jimmy Savile scandal, a large number of BBC employees and politicians have been investigated and/or arrested in connection with child sex abuse2.
In the US over the past few weeks, hundreds have been arrested for child sex crimes3.
In Australia in Nov 2012, the government announced a Royal Commission of Inquiry into child sex abuse4.
In New Zealand in Nov 2012, the Head of State, His Excellency, Lieutenant General the Right Honourable Sir Jerry Mateparae presented Queen’s awards to two known serial paedophiles, Karl Berghan and Sam Brens5.
Spot the difference?
Dave (surname withheld to protect the identity of our daughter, this email address is a pseudonym, please contact me via return email firstname.lastname@example.org )
TOM DIDOVICH talking works .. if Talking works Tom Didovich why don’t you talk and discuss instead of covering up corruption !
I am making this an open letter and addressing it to those associated with the talking works web site.
I have to wonder if you have any formal relationship or just simply all come under the same informal banner I have not been able to establish if you are a proper organisation as such because that very much touches at the heart of my communication to you.
I was wondering if you have a code of ethics ? each of you are associated with one another under the same umbrella and I wondered if you actually tolerate unscrupulous actions of one of your number and if you have required standards of conduct.
I am talking about Tom Didovich who does not practice what he preaches. He is one of three people who have made my life hell over the past 7 years and I very much would like this to end.
Tom is on a trust which has allowed charitable funds to be used to relentlessly pursue me through the court on a un proved claim of defamation so that the gross corruption which he is party to could be covered up.
Tom was the manager of Dog control in Waitakere city council and facilitated a scam which meant that public resources were being misused for personal gain.
I have written to some of you about Tom before the post is here http://www.transparency.net.nz/2012/03/01/talking-works-tom-didovich/
I have just completed three articles about the misuse of the funds which the trust which Tom Didovich is on –
I am a licenced Private Investigator, Former Police Sergeant and was acting for a dog control officer employed at Waitakere who wanted to know why she was volunteering her council paid time to the animal welfare Institute of New Zealand( AWINZ )
AWINZ transpired to be just a name , a name which was promoted and associated with Tom Didovich and through false information which Tom Didovich supplied to the minister attained law enforcement powers identical to those enjoyed by the RNZSPCA.
When I Proved that AWINZ did not exist I asked the simple question of MAF “ why does this law enforcement authority not exist?”
and asked Waitakere city council “why this organisation operated from their premises and used their staff and infrastructure?”. Didovich had signed an agreement with Neil Wells for AWINZ see here then when he left council Wells took Toms position and Tom became a member of a trust called AWINZ all in an attempt to cover up. Tom is up to his neck in this convoluted corrupt practice .
As a result of this Tom Didovich has been a party to the supporting the court proceedings financially through the use of the Lord Dowding fund , and becoming part of a cover up trust to confuse the authorities and mislead the court. I have approached him several times and asked him to talk because talking works but he continues down the path of abuse, which in my mind contradicts everything he is now supposed to stand for.
He is intrinsically entwined in this entire corrupt saga which has torn my family apart , cost me my 23 year marriage , saw my company liquidated on false evidence, seen continued court action to financially strip me( it has cost me some $300,000) . My crime: I was a whistle blower on a matter of public concern.
So I am asking each and every one of you
- do you condone one of your own causing the very problems which you are there to solve, I was near suicide a number of times, suffered depression and lived in fear for many years with what Tom and his associates were doing to me.
- If talking works and you live by your mantra would you intervene and assist someone who is being abused at the hands of one of your own.
- Will you help me and support me
You either walk the talk or you stand by and allow abuse to continue.
I would welcome your support.
I will post a copy of this on my transparency web site . I look forward to seeing that you people are genuine with regards to your cause.
Because truth matters
Phone (09) 520 1815
mobile 027 286 8239
visit us at www.verisure.co.nz
From: Grace Haden [@verisure.co.nz]
Sent: Thursday, 10 January 2013 2:27 p.m.
To: ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’
Cc: ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘email@example.com’
Subject: corrupt practices of Tom Didovich will you support me or condone his actions?
The law commission has published its report on the Review of Official Information Act 1982 and Local Government Official Information Act 1987 submissions can be made online and the acual papers are able to be downloaded
Had I know that submissions were being called for I for one will be making a submission in view of the Wendy Brandon saga.
I have to wonder why the council lawyer gets involved in blocking a request for official information, this apparently is becoming a trend over seas and somehow a law degree gives a person more clout to prevent transparency.
I have made a complaint to the law society with regards to Wendy Brandon’s actions as her obligations as a lawyer are to act according to the rule of law and as a council solicitor the law spells out the requirement for her to act in an open transparent manner.
The law society have come back and said that they will await the reply of the ombudsmen. Given that I have already been down the Ombudsmen path in my protracted AWINZ matter I am braced for another 2 year wait before the information I have requested is released.
Apparently if it released through the ombudsmen I can then take the matter back to the law society and they will look at Ms Brandon again.
So with official information act request and LGOIMA request the right to refusal under the provisions of the acts can be abused by referring all matters to the ombudsmen’s office. This in turn becomes bogged down and the who process comes to a screaming halt.
Now if councils were fined for unnecessarily withholding information that would force compliance much the same way as we are fined by council when we stay in our parking spot for a minute too long.
You have to question who the lawyer works for does the lawyer act for the public who the council is supposed to represent, ensuring that the public’s interest is protected or does the lawyer work for the employees of the council ensuring that corrupt practices are concealed by preventing transparency?
It is our rates money that pays the wages .
While on the topic of submission be sure to check out the parliament site and make submission on issues which you wish to comment on.