Wendy Brandon continues to conceal corruption
I have received a further reply from Wendy Brandon it appears that attack is the best form of defense . In the interest of transparency, the correspondence is below
From: Grace Haden [mailto:grace@verisure.co.nz]
Sent: Friday, 23 November 2012 10:08 a.m.
To: ‘Wendy Brandon’
Cc: ‘info@ombudsman.parliament.nz’; ‘d.carter@ministers.govt.nz’; ‘charles.chauvel@parliament.govt.nz’; ‘Catriona McDougall’; ‘kennedy.graham@parliament.govt.nz’; ‘Mayor Len Brown’; ‘Rob Stock (SUN)’; ‘Councillor Sharon Stewart’
Subject: RE: request for urgent investigation by council
Wendy
You would not be re litigating anything. There is a huge difference between a defamation claim and the claim of corruption. Why does it take 7 years to bring corruption to the attention of council ?
The court has been used to pervert the course of justice and as I have told you there is a proceeding currently before the court for obtaining a judgement by fraud.
You appear to have a very back to front way of dealing with corruption .
I would presume that you have assessed the information which I have sent you and that you are now actively condoning the use of council premises for private pecuniary gain by council employees and that you are condoning council managers contracting to themselves. You are now allowing your office to be used for the concealment of crime and I will be making a complaint to the law society accordingly.
You are making me out to vexatious based on the uncorroborated evidence of Mr Wells who was compelled to deceive the court because of the implications the truth had on his career.
You are condoning the use of council facilities fraudulently and you are not acting in the interest of the administration of justice .
Questioning corruption has cost me an obscene amount of money. Do you honestly think that any one in their right mind will ever question corruption In council again.
Those who are employed are quietly disposed of by confidentiality clauses , those who are not employed like myself are hammered into the ground and totally annihilated through persons like yourself who will not even look at the most basic of documents and asses that there is something terribly wrong.
Wendy attack has always been the best form of defence and by you attacking my character and reputation using judgements which are before the court for having been obtained by fraud are denigrating me You are attacking me because you cannot attack the issue . the issue is that council resources have been used fraudulently and you are ignoring it.
You are doing everything in your power to get me out of the picture. You know that through your actions Corruption will flourish in Auckland city because you are condoning it.
Just let the rate payers pay more so more people can gain privately.
This is a well-documented and researched example of corruption it is under your nose and you don’t even want to learn from it.. that is not just ignorance it goes to negligence.
A lawyer with integrity would look at the documents I have brought to your attention and would act to ensure that councillors are briefed on the perpetration of corruption in council learning from the past prevents expensive mistakes in the future.
How much more is going on and how much more are you condoning? What is in it for You Wendy? Surely your objective should be to protect the councils assets and resources and ensure that they are being used for a proper purpose. You are not doing that Wendy and it appears to me that you are failing the people of Auckland.
I do have to wonder who is paying your wages , strangely enough I thought it was the rate payers not employees within council who have your loyalty to ensure that corruption is concealed.
Regards
Grace Haden
VeriSure
Because truth matters
Phone (09) 520 1815
mobile 027 286 8239
visit us at www.verisure.co.nz
From: Wendy Brandon [mailto:Wendy.Brandon@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz]
Sent: Friday, 23 November 2012 9:10 a.m.
To: ‘Grace Haden’
Cc: info@ombudsman.parliament.nz; d.carter@ministers.govt.nz; charles.chauvel@parliament.govt.nz; Catriona McDougall; kennedy.graham@parliament.govt.nz; Mayor Len Brown; ‘Rob Stock (SUN)’; Councillor Sharon Stewart
Subject: RE: request for urgent investigation by council
Dear Ms Haden
I refer to my email correspondence of yesterday and confirm that if you wish to complain about the responses you have received to your various LGOIMA requests of the past weeks, you have the right to complain to the Ombudsman. I have read both of the High Court and District Court judgments (attached) and it would be inappropriate for me to engage in any re-litigation of matters that have been heard and determined by the courts.
As per below, I am satisfied that over the past several years you have received all of the information held by the former WCC in relation to AWINZ. No new information relating to AWINZ has come into existence in Auckland Council. Given the very strong findings in both the District Court and High Court judgments, your continued requests are vexatious and are accordingly, declined.
Yours faithfully
Wendy Brandon
General Counsel