From: Mike Giddey [mailto:Mike.Giddey@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, 24 October 2012 4:22 p.m.
Subject: FW: REQUEST FOR SPEAKING RIGHTS on serious council corruption has been declined
Thank you for your request, which has been forwarded to staff who handle LGOIMA enquiries and who will respond to you in terms of the provisions in LGOIMA. Briefly, the organisation is aware that the general allegations you make have been heard by a court and determined by the court to be defamatory.
From: Grace Haden
Sent: Wednesday, 24 October 2012 5:06 p.m.
To: ‘Mike Giddey’
Cc: ‘Councillor Sharon Stewart’
Subject: RE: REQUEST FOR SPEAKING RIGHTS on serious council corruption has been declined
I think you have been talking to Mr Wells,, Has he also advised you that there are current proceedings before the court to overturn the decision as new evidence shows that it was obtained by fraud
The facts of the case were never heard and any one can win at defamation in circumstances such as my case.
- The alleged defamatory material was never produced
- My defence of truth and honest opinion was struck out be careful legal maneuvering
- The court never considered the alleged defamatory statements at all and not in context.
- There was only one hearing and that was the Quantum hearing very much like being sentenced without being found guilty first
What occurred is that Mr Wells wrote the animal welfare bill with specific intent of creating the possibility for approved organisations. He was also adviser to the select committee and used his privileged knowledge to circumvent the intention of the law.
He made an application in the name of the Animal Welfare Institute of New Zealand an fictitious organisation. He later set up a trust to cover it up but any one can tell you that a trust set up after an application was made cannot be the applicant.
The former manager of dog control was in on it and later became a trustee of the cover up trust.
Mr Wells became the manager of dog control and as shown in the audit paper which I sent you a copy of ran AWINZ in a manner that it was seamless with council .. read page 2
I have a ton of evidence but no one wants to see it because Wells misled the court and he appears to have many connections in government and council alike.
While he was able to freely direct council staff and ministry staff to obstruct me and deny me information he had open access to staff and resources to do as he pleased and make a personal income.
All I request is for the opportunity to meet with a Councillor to show them the evidence rather than allow council to rely on a court decision which was obtained by fraud and was never a hearing which considered the facts. ( quantum decision only consider how much ,they do not decide guilt )
Could you please put me down for the next meeting or make an appointment for me to produce the evidence to a Councillor involved in issues of corruption.