Harassment by Auckland Council
Open letter to Auckland council
Sent: Sunday, 22 July 2012 1:09 p.m.
To: ‘Doug.McKay@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz’
Cc: ‘len.brown@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz’; ‘sasha.lockley@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz’; ‘Cathy.Casey@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz’ (Cathy.Casey@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz); ‘Councillor Sharon Stewart’; ‘Cameron.Brewer@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz’ (Cameron.Brewer@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz); Councillor Calum Penrose (calum.penrose@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz); ‘Councillor Sandra Coney’; Councillor Chris Fletcher (Chris.Fletcher@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz); ‘Councillor George Wood’; ‘Councillor John Walker’; ‘Councillor Mike Lee’; ‘Councillor Penny Hulse’; ‘Councillor Sandra Coney’
For the past six years I have failed to get accountability or an investigation from council with respect to a perfect fraud where by a council manger was using the council infrastructure, resources , vehicles and staff to derive an income.
This form of gross corruption has been seemingly condoned by council and I have been left severely out of pocket due to being a whistle-blower.
Not only did the council kick me in the teeth I am now apparently being harassed by council.
First of all on Thursday 19 July I received a pay up or else demand from accounts enforcement Limited for $348.78 sent to me on behalf of Water care . I was extremely confused by this as my water care bill arrived the same day and it claimed that my total water care bill was $ 56.89. I spent considerable time sorting this out only to find that someone in their wisdom had written my companies name on the bill in a fraudulent attempt to collect money.
It transpires that some 20 accounts all had the names of the person changed on them and mine was one of them , this is not a mistake this is fraud specifically forgery.
This has now been sorted in my case but there are many people who would not know how to tackle this issue and would pay up on such a fraudulent demand because it is cheaper to pay than it is to speak to a lawyer.
The following day I had a knock on the door, it was a pool inspector seeking to re inspect the pool fence, I told him I was still waiting for the reply from my earlier LGOIMA request
He told me that there had been an inspection on 22 June 2012 , and that the pool fencing did not comply because there is trellis attached to my neighbours side of the fence.pool fencing
It appears that council has now gone the extra mile and the new owners of the property have removed their car port and taken down the trellis which was at the rear of it and instead nailed it to the back fence.
The mere fact that for the past 10 years a kid could have climbed up the trellis and jumped the fence from the top of the car port appears to beside the point, it complied in the past but it does not comply now that my neighbours have chosen to nail the trellis on to the back fence with four nails. I must add that I dispute that child could climb trellis which is stapled together and designed to hold nothing more than a vine. I would not put a child’s safety at risk, besides the four nails which hold it would come out.
I am not gifted with x-ray vision and had no idea that my neighbours had the nerve to think that they could do whatever they wished on their property .However I am now aware of it and have made arrangements for it to be taken down.
The Pool inspector, who was wearing a Waitakere uniform , claimed that I had a copy of the report which I got from him and took a photo copy of
Under LGOIMA please advise me
- Why I had not seen this report and why you have not seen it fit to communicate with me with regards to it.
- Why I have not had a response to my previous LGOIMA as below
I would like to assure you the fence is still as robust as ever. The fence has vertical batons. Is 2.25 meters high and complies with the act in every way.
It appears very much that I am being harassed by Council I have saved the public from a perfect fraud which it would appear that the council condoned.. and you are now harassing me in retribution because you wish to cover up the same of what you allowed to occur under your very noses. The details of this is found on my anticorruption web site together with the evidence of the incompetence of the council in pretending that
I have already received an apology from water care and look forward to the harassment of council to stop.
If it wasn’t for the fact that all these events happen to me at once I would be persuaded to believe that it is incompetence such as what existed when council allowes its managers to run their own businesses during paid time.