open letter to Graeme Coutts ,cc Sarah Giltrap & Nuala Grove
Open letter to Graeme Coutts JP of Graeme Coutts and associates and cc for Nuala Grove and Sarah Giltrap to note as some of this applies to them as well
In the past week I have received some interesting documents from the law society, sent to them By Neil Wells with regards to the trust that you claim to be part of.
Since then I have spoken to you and suggested that you should be seeing your own lawyer as the legal action which you instigated against me was in your own name and this will hold you personally liable for the outcome.
I note that Your “trust” has used some $130,000 of charitable funds to pursue me through the courts . These funds were obtained from Beauty with compassion and this is misappropriation of charitable funds .
My crime was to question the existence of an approved organisation, set up pursuant to section 122 of the animal welfare act 2000 which operated from Waitakere city council through the attached document – mou waitakere . That meant that it had law enforcement authority and public responsibility .
There has been considerable confusion brought about by Mr Wells as to who or what AWINZ is . AWINZ happens to be the name of the approved organisation and it also happens to be the name of a trust which was set up later as a cover up using you Nuala Grove and Sarah Giltrap
The biggest issue with the 2000 AWINZ trust is that it had Mr Wells on it and three people who had no idea what was going on , but their position and status in the community coupled with their impressive sounding names ( not my words But Mr Didovich’s ) leant an air of legitimacy to the farce.
I raised concerns with you and with Mrs grove and Sarah Gltrap , But you have all followed blindly and unquestioningly so I have a few questions to ask you .
I have linked a number of documents so let’s start with the first two. You will notice that two of your fellow trustees on the trustees deed 5 dec 2006 together are the only signatories to the agreement mou waitakere.which was between AWINZ and the dog and stock control at Waitakere city council and facilitated the use of Waitakere city council staff to volunteer their council paid time to derive an income for the trust which you claim to belong to.
Strangely enough Mr Wells who signed on behalf of AWINZ then went on to take over the council role of Mr Didovich and Mr Didovich went on to become a trustee .Many would say that this is a gross conflict of interest.
Mr Didovich had supported Mr Wells in the application for approved status by writing to the minister as though he was in depended from the matter didovich to maf north shore and didovich to maf waitakere and then went out and collected the signatures of the alleged trustees of this trust deed .
If you now look at the document mou MAF, you will see that it places legal obligations on AWINZ. Had you not thought that it is strange that all these obligations were fulfilled By Mr Wells alone without you , Sarah or Nuala playing a supporting role.
When I questioned you in court with regards to the animal welfare officers you didn’t even know what I was talking about. Nuala Grove is adamant that the trust did not have law enforcement powers yet Mr Wells was busily prosecuting the public and banking the funds which came back to AWINZ through section 171 of the act, into the bank account which only he administered
Strange to that the income from prosecution does not show in the AWINZ MEETING MINUTES 10-05-06 and it is also strange that a supposed law enforcement trust had not met for nearly 2 years prior to this and by its own statement on the minutes did not intend to meet again until nearly 18 months later .
I have to question why a trust meeting was not called when the only person who was doing all the work for AWINZ took on the role of manager dog and stock control.. why was the trust not worried about this apparent conflict of interest from your own point of view? . You being a JP and all should have ensured that there was some transparency and that would have begun by raising the issue in a meeting.
Too late now can’t create the documents Mr Wells has set things in concrete besides I am a bit over the retrospective creation of documents by you lot.
Don’t you find that the AWINZ MEETING MINUTES 10-05-06 read rather like a briefing ? strange too that the secretary Nula Grove was unaware that she had been secretary and now cant remember. I note that the minute were also typed by Waitakere council staff.. great way to keep your trusts outgoings down get the public to pay for it .
I was on a trust with Neil Wells in 2005 , the trust I was on the Auckland air cadet trust (AACT ) ran a building , Mr Wells was the chairman and ran things very differently. The trust was incorporated, Trustees were appointed according to the deed after they had been selected by the other trustees and voted on which is very different to the appointment of Wyn Hoadley who was chair designate a month and a half before the meeting. a and was appointed pursuant to section 7.2(b) which is section which does not appear in the original trust deed, but then the deed was missing was found and went missing again in 2007 but in 2008 by some miracle we had two copies of the deed. Praise the Lord ! or is that praise modern reproductive technology ?
The AACT trust met monthly, the trustees were signatories to the bank account and no one person had control, I was treasurer and could not even have a pre signed cheque yet in 2007 Neil Wells was still the only person operating the AWINZ bank accounts.
The AACT did not have legislative powers or responsibilities such as those shown in the mou MAF which wells signed as trustee.
If you signed the deed why did you not have a copy of it? on the AACT Mr Wells ensured that all trustees had a copy of the deed and we all ensured that the trust ran according to the deed. – on that point why did you say to me that there was no need to meet you were not that type of trust ? did you not read the deed? what do you think ” shall meet no less than 4 times” per year means how bad can some ones maths be ?Every 2 years is a long way off!
Graeme did you really know what you were doing? Did Sarah and Nuala know which way was up? or was it just nice to have your name associated with little furry things?. Did you know that ignorance of the law is no excuse and that by your ignorance you may well have facilitated a crime?
Why did you not question the lack of correspondence in the 2 years since the trust last met? seems like I knew more about your trust than you do . Of particular is of interest is the lord dowding document. Over $100,000 was obtained between the meetings, I know the exact sum that was received do you ? surely the reference to the bank account in 2005 would have had some involvement of trustees?
Graeme You are the only one who is connected with the old trust deed and the new one, you play a pivotal role , and I wonder how you had a quorum for the decision to take legal action against me , there appears to be no consensus or discussion from the trustees.. I guess you were just obedient and nodded when Neil Wells told you to and you kept your eyes closed .
All three of you Sarah Giltrap, Nuala Grove and You Graeme Coutts were prepared to tell lies to the world by giving a false end title to the Lord of the rings trilogy in the name of AWINZ s reported by the aha what did you and your trustees do when you saw the aha letter or is this the first time you are seeing it?
Did you not think it strange that Tom Didovich and Neil wells were joined at the hip on this venture, did you not think it strange that Didovich the manager you were going to contract to was collecting and witnessing the signatures to the deed?didovich affidavit may 07
But what amuses me most of all is that you are a JP and you have not got the slightest clue of matters which pertain to your own trust. It appears to me (and this is my honest opinion many would agree) that the three of you were selected because apparently you don’t think and could be led by the nose.
Through your lawyer you held out that your trust was the approved organisation, you instructed him , apparently you signed a document which he had before he commenced the proceedings.. surely you must have had all the facts before you took me to court and devastated my life and family?
Did you ever ask your lawyer Nick Wright how your trust came to be an approved organisation and exactly what that entailed? Statement of Claim
It is wake up time for you now please read the attached documents be aware of the damage you have caused and start acting responsibly it may be your last chance cant remain ignorant for ever.
Ask Neil if you can look at the minute book and see where you authorised the use of the charitable funds for the litigation and ask him where you are indemnified. You may be in for a shock.
Graeme, this is mop up time let’s see what we can do to sort out the damage.. I am sure you don’t want to go through what I have had to go through for the next 5 years .
The price I have had to pay for blowing the whistle has been far too high. If you, a JP had been astute, this would never have happened . You facilitated this with your wilful blindness, your total neglect and ignorance of what it means to be a trustee and an approved organisation.
You are a JP you have obligations to the law and to the public funds which you have misappropriated.( that is a criminal matter )
You can no longer plead ignorance . I have blind carbon copied a significant number of people who can bear witness to the fact that you are now fully informed , the same goes for Sarah Giltrap and Barrister Daniel Grove who is protecting his mother .
If you would like to meet with me to discuss resolution I would be willing to make that available to you even though you denied me the opportunity.
The same invitation is open to Sarah Giltrap and Nuala grove.
I will be posting this open letter on www.Transparency.net.nz
Regards
Grace Haden